Started By
Message
Posted on 11/28/22 at 3:14 am to Jjdoc
So, please explain to me like I am a 5 year old, how Hugh was able to connect the identity of Jane Doe #7 before she went public?
You realize she only went public after he DM’d her?
So how was he able to procure her identity?
You realize she only went public after he DM’d her?
So how was he able to procure her identity?
Posted on 11/28/22 at 3:19 am to rebeloke
quote:
So, please explain to me like I am a 5 year old, how Hugh was able to connect the identity of Jane Doe #7 before she went public?
You realize she only went public after he DM’d her?
So how was he able to procure her identity?
Wasn't she blasting the AD on twitter?
Posted on 11/28/22 at 3:23 am to PickupAutist
quote:
If you're going to wear that badge on your sleeve and talk the talk then you also better walk the walk. I think the girl is lying or embellishing to the point of lying, but I also believe Hugh is being punished and that punishment is divine in nature. He can still do great works for God (assuming he is genuine and not a Judas Iscariot), but he needs to humble himself and never get behind a pulpit again.
Hugh Freeze is that you in that avatar? Make perfect sense with that avatar but the username isn't quite right though. Shouldn't it be name as Con Artist?

Posted on 11/28/22 at 4:38 am to PickupAutist
quote:
I think the girl is lying or embellishing to the point of lying.
Why?
Posted on 11/28/22 at 5:02 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
I think the girl is lying or embellishing to the point of lying.
Why?
She claims the University never told her she could contact local police.
She's attacking the AD when no one whatsoever involved with the Athletic Department(staff or student) was involved.
I'm not going to say she's lying about being sexually assualted.....but I do think she's using the fact that it's Liberty to attack people completely unrelated to the alleged incident.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 5:23 am to rebeloke
quote:
So, please explain to me like I am a 5 year old, how Hugh was able to connect the identity of Jane Doe #7 before she went public?
Inside edition
Posted on 11/28/22 at 7:31 am to STATEofMIND
Some are revealing their identity and some are not. These are two but who are the other eleven? About a year ago there was 13, are there more since then?
Little Falwell needs to just deed the University over to these women and fade into obscurity. The women can probably do a better job of running the place than little Falwell is doing.
Little Falwell needs to just deed the University over to these women and fade into obscurity. The women can probably do a better job of running the place than little Falwell is doing.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 7:31 am to STATEofMIND
thank God rebeloke is not an air traffic controller
Posted on 11/28/22 at 7:41 am to pankReb
quote:
Wasn't she blasting the AD on twitter?
Yes, Freeze probably didn’t know she sued Liberty. BTW the lawsuit was settled in May, about 2 months before the DM. Can y’all please stop repeating misinformation.
There was no ongoing investion at the time of the DM.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 7:43 am to Ironlung
I’m sure the OP has auburn’s best interest at heart.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 7:43 am to pankReb
quote:
I'm not going to say she's lying about being sexually assualted.....but I do think she's using the fact that it's Liberty to attack people completely unrelated to the alleged incident.
Been trying to tell people this since Saturday. It amazes that in the age of information people are so lazy as to repeat the same lie for days on end.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 8:08 am to SingleMalt1973
#antifreeze claims there is an ongoing federal investigation… You guys are really grabbing at straws here…
https://twitter.com/chelsandrews/status/1596548877171261440?s=46&t=8afZZmAcp4qu9H2GLxzSew
https://twitter.com/chelsandrews/status/1596548877171261440?s=46&t=8afZZmAcp4qu9H2GLxzSew
This post was edited on 11/28/22 at 8:11 am
Posted on 11/28/22 at 8:56 am to rebeloke
But is he listed as part of the case? She states he is coming from a school under investigation but doesn’t state he is part of it.
He is not guilty by association. Hey what about all the other faculty there? Are they “guilty” of being a part of a cover up for teaching there?
He is not guilty by association. Hey what about all the other faculty there? Are they “guilty” of being a part of a cover up for teaching there?
Posted on 11/28/22 at 9:07 am to Ironlung
Having Hugh Freeze as your coach is a lot like hooking up with a crazy ex. It's a fun ride for a while, but it's going to end badly.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 9:09 am to Referee
quote:
Some are revealing their identity and some are not. These are two but who are the other eleven? About a year ago there was 13, are there more since then?
Reloke stated she only revealed herself after Freeze contacted her.
Stateof Mind is showing she revealed herself a long time ago.
quote:
Little Falwell needs to just deed the University over to these women and fade into obscurity. The women can probably do a better job of running the place than little Falwell is doing.
Falwell is not running the University. He holds no positions.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 9:20 am to Ironlung
quote:
If Auburn thinks they're getting a repentant man
is he a good football coach? yes
is he a bad person that other schools will negatively recruit against? also yes
Posted on 11/28/22 at 9:34 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Jjdoc
I am not sure if you are aware that she is a victim of sexual assault or not but that alone is cause for sympathy in her case? But she may very well have further involvement in an investigation, which could meant Feeeze is guilty of witness tampering.
Posted on 11/28/22 at 9:49 am to rebeloke
quote:
am not sure if you are aware that she is a victim of sexual assault or not but that alone is cause for sympathy in her case?
Sympathy does not equal attacking someone for something they didn’t have anything to do with because they worked at the place you had a lawsuit against.
quote:
But she may very well have further involvement in an investigation, which could meant Feeeze is guilty of witness tampering.
Telling her she is wrong about something on Twitter isn’t witness tampering. It’s a public square.
How about I tell you that you work for a company that encourages rape and you post you disagree and your boss is a good guy. Doesn’t matter if it’s public or a DM, that’s just opinions.
Also if it was under a federal investigation where she was a “key witness” don’t you think her lawyers would be telling her to STFU on social media about it?
Back to top
