Started By
Message
re: The “big 6” in the expanded SEC.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:10 pm to The Godfather
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:10 pm to The Godfather
quote:
Auburn has a NC more recently than Oklahoma, Texas, Georgia and Florida
OU/Tex/UF all have more though.
2
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:10 pm to EastTXHorn
quote:
We beat Georgia in 2018 with a Tom Herman led squad scattered with freshman.
Big 1
If this is your "go to", then you're much more like Aggie than you want to admit.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:11 pm to Chadaristic
quote:
What do you people think big 6 means?
Because i'm seeing a lot of posts all over this board that clearly show that a lot of people don't understand why the big 6 is the big 6.
I think everyone understands what the original definition of Big 6 was.
But the point is that in light of Tennessee being a complete joke for 23 years, it would seem prudent to immediately elevate OU to a position at the table seeing as it is a much better program.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:11 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
#Original10
Oh yeah, I like that.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:12 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
OU/Tex/UF all have more though.
Im not saying kick out Florida, im saying OU and TU have to wait and earn a spot. Damn sure not kicking out Auburn. Tennessee better get good quick
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:12 pm to EastTXHorn
quote:
EastTXHorn
You are really excited to be here. Congratulations on getting to the pinnacle without much work really.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:13 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
I think everyone understands what the original definition of Big 6 was.
Clearly not if you are talking about replacing somebody.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:13 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
But the point is that in light of Tennessee being a complete joke for 23 years, it would seem prudent to immediately elevate OU to a position at the table seeing as it is a much better program.
No harm in making OU win it first
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:14 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
I think everyone understands what the original definition of Big 6 was.
But the point is that in light of Tennessee being a complete joke for 23 years, it would seem prudent to immediately elevate OU to a position at the table seeing as it is a much better program.
So you understand how the big 6 is defined, yet you want to remove a member that qualifies by definition and replace them with a new member that does not qualify by definition?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:15 pm to Leto II
quote:
Clearly not if you are talking about replacing somebody
Isn’t the original definition “teams that have won the SEC Championship” since expansion in 1992?
Why do we continue to abide by the 1992 benchmark when we’ve had expansion in 2012 and are about to have another expansion in the coming years?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:15 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Big 6 grows when someone new wins an SEC title.
If it gets too big (for example if A&M, Texas and OU all won), we should probably switch to national titles won in the SEC during the BCS/Playoff era.
So it's the 6 schools that have won an SEC title game? Or the 6 schools that have won the SEC since integration? Although I don't know about the last one since Kentucky won the SEC in the 70s.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:16 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
So it's the 6 schools that have won an SEC title game? Or the 6 schools that have won the SEC since integration? Although I don't know about the last one since Kentucky won the SEC in the 70s.
Title game/expansion
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:17 pm to S
People that are late for the meeting have never been allowed to enter discussion
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:17 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
Why do we continue to abide by the 1992 benchmark when we’ve had expansion in 2012 and are about to have another expansion in the coming years?
Um, because none of the other teams have won an SEC title in 30+ years. Win one and that will change.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:17 pm to arleno
quote:
Texas
quote:
blue blood
Hilarious
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:18 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Big6 has nothing directly to do with championships. It’s always been the 6 prestige/power/influence/history players in the league
For those that aren’t aware, the Big6 - which is certainly not an “official” group - has always been:
-Bama
-Aub
-LSU
-UGA
-Florida
-Tennessee
Tennessee has certainly teetered on losing their Big6 VIP card over the last decade or so.
For those that aren’t aware, the Big6 - which is certainly not an “official” group - has always been:
-Bama
-Aub
-LSU
-UGA
-Florida
-Tennessee
Tennessee has certainly teetered on losing their Big6 VIP card over the last decade or so.
This post was edited on 7/23/21 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:19 pm to FreddieMac
quote:
Hilarious
Are they not?
Who would you say are the "blue bloods" nationally?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:19 pm to Leto II
So we revoked Ole Miss from discussion because they hadn’t won one since 1962, but Tennessee still gets to be considered for membership even though they haven’t done shite since 1998?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:20 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
or those that aren’t aware, the Big6 - which is certainly not an “official” group, has always been:
-Bama
-Aub
-LSU
-UGA
-Florida
-Tennessee
this aint changing until someone else can win the SEC title in football. Clearly Tennessee needs to get it's act together soon or they will fade away
Posted on 7/23/21 at 12:21 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
So we revoked Ole Miss from discussion because they hadn’t won one since 1962
Ole Miss won the SEC Title game in 1962? shite I didn't even know they played one back then. Guess you learn something new every day.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News