Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:15 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
Can you be more specific instead of generally talking about what "would" have happened? There's nothing concrete about your argument.
Ok. There were 4 teams just in the SEC better than South Carolina in 2012: Bama, UF, LSU and A&M. Would you say LSU, UF and A&M all should be on this list?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:17 pm to Niner
quote:
21. 2008 Texas
Cote's shoulder, man. Bama doesn't cheat and break him, that game is over the in the 2nd quarter. No doubt.
(For maximum effect, read this in "Uncle Rico" voice.)
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:32 pm to jchamil
If we're going off record then sure, but if we're going off talent and potential then no. My position for putting Carolina on this list is based off of talent and potential rather than record, and I would hope the writer did the same.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:33 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Cote's shoulder, man. Bama doesn't cheat and break him, that game is over the in the 2nd quarter. No doubt.
that was 2009. Not 2008.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:35 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
If we're going off record then sure,
we are
quote:
if we're going off talent and potential then no
how are you quantifying talent and potential? There have been hundreds of teams with more top to bottom talent than 2012 carolina that did not win a title.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:36 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
If we're going off record then sure, but if we're going off talent and potential then no. My position for putting Carolina on this list is based off of talent and potential rather than record, and I would hope the writer did the same.
What about 44-11 to Driskel and Muschamp?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:37 pm to Niner
quote:
5. 2009 Florida
Shouldn't be top 5. We had major issues on offense.
Our 01 team was probably Spurrier's most talented. #1 in offense and #3 in defense.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:40 pm to Korin
quote:
Our 01 team was probably Spurrier's most talented. #1 in offense and #3 in defense.
i can't believe yall lost to UT. If yall win that game you easily handle LSU and are facing miami for the title.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:41 pm to WG_Dawg
The game should've never been postponed after 9/11. 
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:42 pm to Korin
We went over this already.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:43 pm to Korin
quote:
What about 44-11 to Driskel and Muschamp?
Irrelevant, all that matters is the "potential" and talent on the team.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:44 pm to Gatorbait2008
2001 VOLS as well
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:45 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
If we're going off record then sure, but if we're going off talent and potential then no. My position for putting Carolina on this list is based off of talent and potential rather than record, and I would hope the writer did the same
I'm just going on purely who I think would win games against the other teams that year. If you're going on talent and potential, without looking at who ended up in the NFL, I'd be fairly confident in saying Bama, LSU, UF and A&M all put out more talent than South Carolina. I'm guessing that you place 2010 Bama over 2010 South Carolina if this is how you are judging them?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:45 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
We went over this already.
No, you and I haven't been over this already.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:46 pm to sand mountainDvalues
quote:
2001 VOLS as well
lolno
lost to an unranked uga at home with a 1st year coach adn FR quarterback then lost to a 3 loss lsu with a backup QB.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:47 pm to WG_Dawg
You don't think they were a great team? I mean our 01 team lost to 7-5 Auburn.
Georgia finished ranked in both polls.
Georgia finished ranked in both polls.
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:47 pm to sand mountainDvalues
quote:
2001 VOLS as well
I suspect 01 UF/01 UT/06 LSU were left off because of having 2 losses.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:47 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
how are you quantifying talent and potential?
Same logic that you're using to say:
quote:
There have been hundreds of teams with more top to bottom talent than 2012 carolina
All subjective and impossible to confirm or deny.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:48 pm to Korin
01 UT was a very good team. But we're talking about the 25 best non-title winning teams over 100 years of football, and despite them being elite when they were on and playing really well all season they had 2 head scratching, unexplainable, inexcusable losses to vastly inferior teams. I think that disqualifies them.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News