Started By
Message
re: Thank You Mike Slive... The Texas Trainwreck.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:40 pm to texashorn
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:40 pm to texashorn
quote:
Your link (the credible one, at least) shows that the Pac-10 responded after the Big Ten already announced it would expand.
Like RIGHT after. And I have shown that it seemed like common knowledge that Larry Scott was brought in FOR expansion.
And as I pointed out JoePa said anything before anyone. Looks like he started the rape of the Big 12 if we go by your logic.
1
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:40 pm to TbirdSpur2010
It was only strained because the Texas representatives had a rough flight. Has nothing to do with them talking to the PAC
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:40 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Aggies tend to forget (even though I think one admitted it earlier in this thread) that every single issue of contention (partial qualifiers, moving the conference headquarters to Texas, heavy rotation of conf. football champ. game in Texas) were... wait for it....
ALL voted FOR by A&M. Right down the line.
ALL voted FOR by A&M. Right down the line.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:41 pm to texashorn
What was the score of that Texas/Ole Miss game? I can't recall it off the top of my head.
This post was edited on 12/13/13 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:42 pm to MIZ_STL
quote:
What was the score of that Texas/Ole Miss game? I can't recall it off the top of my head.
No one can because no one was able to watch it on tv
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:42 pm to texashorn
quote:You forgot the LHN.
every single issue of contention
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:43 pm to texashorn
quote:
Aggies tend to forget (even though I think one admitted it earlier in this thread) that every single issue of contention (partial qualifiers, moving the conference headquarters to Texas, heavy rotation of conf. football champ. game in Texas) were... wait for it....
ALL voted FOR by A&M. Right down the line.
Ah, the ol' timeline argument didn't work out so hot for you, so now it's on to the next Dodds talking point, right?
And your point is that A&M should have just kept voting like texas wanted and everything would be ok. Do you see how arrogant that is? Or are you really this ignorant?
What did you major in at texas? Obviously they failed in educating you
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:43 pm to texashorn
Yeah, and this proves....hmmm what was the point again?
Oh, yeah, that A&M MUST have been happy with the Big 12. But then something else MUST have happened changed for them to be weary of the Longhorns, what was that?
Oh, yeah, that A&M MUST have been happy with the Big 12. But then something else MUST have happened changed for them to be weary of the Longhorns, what was that?
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:44 pm to texashorn
quote:By June 2010, the PAC-10 had already passed on Texas.
texashorn
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:46 pm to texashorn
quote:
Aggies tend to forget
No we don't we are ashamed of ourseleves for that. I stated earlier yhat when we balked the rest of the conference relized they could too. Then Texas went all Texas on everybody and that's when those of us that could told y'all to kiss our asses and left thereby making you the big fish in a much smaller stinkier pond
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:47 pm to texashorn
quote:
Aggies tend to forget (even though I think one admitted it earlier in this thread) that every single issue of contention (partial qualifiers, moving the conference headquarters to Texas, heavy rotation of conf. football champ. game in Texas) were... wait for it....
ALL voted FOR by A&M. Right down the line.
Yes, we apologize, we forget sometimes what it was like on Masta Dodds Plantation:
Look we freely admit that we went along with some bad decisions. But, to quote a favorite sip line, we were only one vote. And more importantly, we were NOT the ones pushing for a team network.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:48 pm to texashorn
quote:
quote:
The beleaguered conference made a rousing comeback Monday, when Texas declined an invitation to join the Pac-10 and decided to stay in the Big 12.
Because the PAC said no way to the LHN! And Texas still tried to extort money from the rest of the conference because they so magnanimously decided to stay - or that's how they tried to spin it. Those that were there knew better.
I will say this - I used to admire Texas' skillful use of the media to get their message out and spin it to their advantage. But this whole "fire-Mack-Brown-and-hire-Saban" deal is a shite show worthy of its own barnyard.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:49 pm to texashorn
Yea we did some things we shouldn't have, but we weren't negotiating behind programs backs on their behalf with a new conference, and not on a tu/a&m exclusive network
This post was edited on 12/13/13 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:49 pm to texashorn
quote:
Your reading comprehension sucks dick.
You should show more respect--particularly when you're a guest.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:50 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Watching them twist in the ruins of the conference they destroyed brings me more joy than it ought.
Watching them twist in the ruins of the latest conference they destroyed brings me more joy than it ought.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:50 pm to semotruman
quote:
this whole "fire-Mack-Brown-and-hire-Saban" deal
He gone.
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:50 pm to semotruman
Now that Saban has used and abused Texas like a pawn to get a better contract, who does Texas go after and miss out on next?
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:51 pm to cyde
quote:
He gone.
Nah. He wants no part of that shite show in Austin Gotta beleedat, cyde!
Posted on 12/13/13 at 4:52 pm to MIZ_STL
No no no, saban isn't using them, they are using saban to get harbaugh to come to Austin
Page 16 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News