Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M signee that played in G League just got a TRO from a Texas judge
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:13 pm to SidewalkTiger
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:13 pm to SidewalkTiger
A&M made their position clear. So if the kid wants to play he is free to transfer.
There is no bragging. There is waiting to see how LSU handles it…
There is no bragging. There is waiting to see how LSU handles it…
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:16 pm to AGGIES
See what plays out from here?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:16 pm to AGGIES
quote:
A&M made their position clear. So if the kid wants to play he is free to transfer.
There is no bragging. There is waiting to see how LSU handles it…
I think the biggest difference is that A&M seems to have signed an actual former pro and then let him sit on the roster for months.
LSU seems to have just talked about it.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:19 pm to SidewalkTiger
Oh silly you… you forgot that A&M isn’t battling the SEC over it, once the SEC announced a rule this week.
Is LSU indicating that they might be going to battle…
Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.
Is LSU indicating that they might be going to battle…
Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:20 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Oh silly you… you forgot that A&M isn’t battling the SEC over it, once the SEC announced a rule this week.
Is LSU indicating that they might be going to battle…
Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.
LSU isn't doing anything; you just don't understand what's going on.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:20 pm to SidewalkTiger
Honestly, if I was LSU I hope they don't try to go through with following court order. If LSU hasn't signed the players and the players sue LSU that goes right up to the SEC to pay the damages.
If LSU signed the players but kicks them off, LSU gets sued and the SEC still pays a portion of the damages because of what they impose on their members.
The SEC is tied to this through and through.
If LSU signed the players but kicks them off, LSU gets sued and the SEC still pays a portion of the damages because of what they impose on their members.
The SEC is tied to this through and through.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:23 pm to SidewalkTiger
Yes, it’s very clear that LSU is not being proactive. We can all see that.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:26 pm to AGGIES
Honestly, I think LSU has played this pretty well.
They have stated they are on the position of the court and the law.
They abstained from voting on the penalties the SEC can levy, which creates a degree of separation for any anti-trust laswsuits brought. I think the 15-0 "unified vote" is being misinterpreted and the trouble it could cause for other members.
LSU took the PR hit up front, but long term might play to their benefit.
They have stated they are on the position of the court and the law.
They abstained from voting on the penalties the SEC can levy, which creates a degree of separation for any anti-trust laswsuits brought. I think the 15-0 "unified vote" is being misinterpreted and the trouble it could cause for other members.
LSU took the PR hit up front, but long term might play to their benefit.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:27 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Yes, it’s very clear that LSU is not being proactive. We can all see that.
They've done everything that Aggie has, except roster a pro player.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:28 pm to SidewalkTiger
Not quite.
They abstained from voting.
They chose sides.
They abstained from voting.
They chose sides.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:29 pm to AGGIES
quote:
They abstained from voting.
They chose sides.
Staying silent is not choosing sides. It is smart from a legal perspective.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:29 pm to Veritas
I can see your position. It’s a calculated move. But long term I don’t see the benefit.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:29 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Not quite.
They abstained from voting.
They chose sides.
Only on penalties. Abstaining from casting a vote is quite literally, not choosing sides.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:31 pm to ColoradoAg
quote:
He will be removed from the roster shortly
Link?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:31 pm to AGGIES
quote:
I can see you position. It’s a calculated move. But long term I don’t see the benefit.
If this all goes down the route of being heard in federal court for anti-trust violations, LSU being able to say we didn't vote for that is very smart.
If a judge rules 15 SEC members (except LSU) voted for something against the sherman anti trust act, LSU looks brilliant
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:35 pm to Veritas
OK, let’s say LSU looks brilliant for abstaining.
To what end? Future lawsuits v. the SEC?
Seems shortsighted to me, but I don’t have all the info.
To what end? Future lawsuits v. the SEC?
Seems shortsighted to me, but I don’t have all the info.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:37 pm to AGGIES
quote:
OK, let’s say LSU looks brilliant for abstaining.
To what end? Future lawsuits v. the SEC?
Seems shortsighted to me, but I don’t have all the info.
Why's it shortsighted? There was no negative to abstaining. It's a neutral-win proposition.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:42 pm to SidewalkTiger
Not that… I meant if it’s 3D chess to prepare yourself for a big LSU v. SEC showdown in court.
Then it might be a case of play stupid games, win stupid prizes
Then it might be a case of play stupid games, win stupid prizes
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:43 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Not that… I meant if it’s 3D chess to prepare yourself for a big LSU v. SEC showdown in court.
Then it might be a case of play stupid games, win stupid prizes
How?
Nothing bad can happen from abstaining from a vote on potential penalties. This is never going to be LSU vs. SEC.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 8:44 pm to SidewalkTiger
For the third time. I’m not talking about just abstaining.
If you were reading along this whole time, you would know that my follow up was “to what end”?
As in…what is the endgame here?
If you were reading along this whole time, you would know that my follow up was “to what end”?
As in…what is the endgame here?
Popular
Back to top


1


