Started By
Message
re: Sumlin & Strong Reunite for Resumption of Rivary
Posted on 4/14/15 at 2:53 pm to Tornado Alley
Posted on 4/14/15 at 2:53 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Keep claiming the made up titles, bruh.
We only doing what your daddy taught us was the SEC way brah
2
Posted on 4/14/15 at 2:56 pm to Dr RC
Recognized titles....
And 6 more conference championships
And 6 more conference championships
Posted on 4/14/15 at 2:57 pm to Dr RC
quote:
We only doing what your daddy taught us was the SEC way brah
Umm, you must not be aware of tSECW Big Bro pecking order.
Big Bro --> Lil' Bro
Alabama --> Auburn
Ole Miss --> Mississippi State
LSU --> Texas A&M
Arkansas --> Texas A&M
Only flagship institutions of their respective states can be a big bro. Y'all have been here long enough to understand this rule. Get it together out there, man
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:00 pm to Tornado Alley
Sniffing glues gonna kill you little bro 
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:01 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Recognized titles....
No one outside of Tuscaloosa and South Bend gives a flying Fijian frick about some bogus titles in the mid- to late-1910s
quote:
And 6 more conference championships
Congrats on winning the equivalent of the P5 honorable mention award
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:01 pm to Tornado Alley
and when there's more than one flagship...
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:02 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
That's the point. Our counter offer is for them to frick themselves.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:03 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Only flagship institutions of their respective states can be a big bro.
A&M is a state flagship and your big bro cant be from out of state.
Jesus man is your tiger peen so tiny that you had to try to insert LSU into a dig at Auburn?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:05 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Most rational people realize that it takes both parties to agree on a contract. You cannot have a unilateral dictate of when and where this game may be played.
Which is why I don't expect it to resumed any time soon.
This post was edited on 4/14/15 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:05 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
"A program cannot be a flagship with a losing record, much less an abysmal losing record, to the other school it challenges for state control." Mullen v. Sumlin, 113 So.3d 404, 408 (5th Cir. 2013).
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:06 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
These two schools have the same kind of rivalry as a hammer and a nail. Of course with Texas being the hammer and the Aggies being the nail
quote:
Auburn Fan
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:07 pm to Dr RC
at you thinking I'm a Tigah Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:07 pm to Tornado Alley
Losing record to A&M since joining the SEC..
That was the metric YOU said should be used
That was the metric YOU said should be used
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:08 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Keep claiming the made up titles, bruh.
To be fair, their 1919 claim IS listed on the NCAA site.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:09 pm to Spindicus Lofrus
quote:
All kidding aside, for the SEC to reach its full potential, it needs Texas to come in and take charge.
Well done. You'll probably notice from the replies that subtlety is lost on most of this crowd.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:11 pm to Old Sarge
Right, it should be used because is is relevant, a concept y'all seem to struggle with, seeing as how Big Bro Longhorn is in the abyss yet still makes more money than you.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:13 pm to Tornado Alley
The University of Louisiana Ragin Cajins - aka - Louisiana is the Flagship of the state, no?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:18 pm to Tornado Alley
Then by your chosen reasoning
A&M is daddy over Ole Miss, Miss State, and Auburn
You defined the rule
A&M is daddy over Ole Miss, Miss State, and Auburn
You defined the rule
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:19 pm to KaiserSoze99
You won't hear anything to the contrary from me on that front.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:19 pm to Tornado Alley
Serious question, Tornado Alley ... and I'm asking you, bc I respect you as a poster ....
What's the deal w "big bro/little bro" around these parts?
Is that an SEC thing, or a tSECr thing?
Just curious; the whole thing is unintelligible.
When I think of these rascally little college kids claiming big bro status, I chuckle.
What's the deal w "big bro/little bro" around these parts?
Is that an SEC thing, or a tSECr thing?
Just curious; the whole thing is unintelligible.
When I think of these rascally little college kids claiming big bro status, I chuckle.
Page 12 of 24
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News