Started By
Message
re: State couldnt have asked for a better schedule....
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:23 pm to bamasgot13
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:23 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
One season did all of that for them, though. They lack the consistency of being a top 10 program year in and year out of the other teams you mentioned.
Bama 4 yr record: 12-2, 14-0, 10-3, 11-1 (47-6)
LSU 4 yr record: 8-5, 9-4, 11-2, 13-0 (41-11)
UF 4 yr record: 13-1, 13-1, 8-5, 6-6 (38-13)
AU 4 yr record: 5-7, 8-5, 14-0, 7-5 (34-17)
AU is the only of those teams to have 5+ loses in 3 of the last 4 seasons. Again, they are a very good program and certainly in the "big 6", but they aren't on LSU or Bama's level of consistency. That was my point.
(chose 4 yr record b/c that reflect performance of those still on the roster)
I love the timing game. Never mind that national title last year...but make sure to start after 2004.
This falls into the who gives a frick, bama and lsu are certainly the cream of the crop right now...at this very moment...and next year you coudl probably say bama doesnt' belong in the same category with LSU and then spin it another way.
Your back handed compliments are trite and tiresome. We get it, auburn shouldn't be mentioned with bama. Moving right along.
As for states schedule...shoudl favor well for them until the end. Not getting into the 2010 pissing match where state puts all the focus on auburn game and we make snide remarkes reminding them that it's just another game for us...gotta have something for the offseason.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 4:26 pm
0
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:49 pm to bamasgot13
quote:No, that isn't why and that reasoning doesn't reflect a college program. You did it because 2003-2007 reflects poorly on Bama and pretty good on AU. In other words, the last 4 years ignore Bama's rebuilding/transition years while including AU's. Auburn has been as consistently a top program as Bama over the last 10, 20 or 30 years. If you go all time, AU isn't in Bama's league or if you reduce it to just the last 4 years, the same can be said.
(chose 4 yr record b/c that reflect performance of those still on the roster)
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:12 pm to WDE24
quote:
WDE24
Look, I expected you (unlike piggy) to give me the benefit of the doubt. I was responding to someone who said AU is right there with LSU & Bama based on recent recruiting. He set the timeframe by his discussion of AU's recruiting success recently.
I'll not dispute that Bama didn't belong in AU's category from 2003 - 2007. You guys went 4-0 against us during that time and had a substantially better overall record. That said, from 2008 - 20011 Bama is 3-1 against AU and two of those games have been really lopsided. During that time AU has lost 5+ games in 3 of 4 years (similar to Bama in the 2003-2007 period when we didn't belong in AU's category).
Cut me a bit of slack here, bruh. It is perfectly rational for me to have the opinion that we need to see more of Chizik before we can determine if 2010 was a reflection of the type of success we can expect from AU, or if the 8-5 records that bookend that season are a reflection. It is ok to have differing opinions and those opinions NOT be taken (or intended) as a flame.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:15 pm to bamasgot13
How did this become an Auburn thread?
Didnt read the past 4 pages
Didnt read the past 4 pages
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:16 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
How did this become an Auburn thread?
Doesn't it always
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:23 pm to bamasgot13
I don't disagree with your analysis in the time frames listed, I just questioned the reasoning of the time frame picked. Using only the last 4 years, AU isn't in LSU or Bama's category, but using the last 10 years and beyond up to 30 years or so, AU and UF both belong. That is all I was saying. Not a personal attack bro.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:25 pm to WDE24
quote:
last 10 years and beyond up to 30 years or so, AU and UF both belong
I don't disagree at all, that's why I said:
quote:
AU is a very good program. They are without question a "big 6" SEC school. However, over the last 5 years Bama, LSU, and UF have been the "Big 3". AU is not on that level, bruh.
earlier in the thread before using the data (read: STATS) to back it up.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:40 pm to CoonassBulldog
7-5 or 8-4 with a win against aubarn
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:42 pm to BulioBones
12-0 with wins against everyone.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:43 pm to BulioBones
One year...hopefully soon for their sake.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:44 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
Auburn game decides whether we start 7-0 or not
I'd say the chalk would be 5-2 with 4 straight losses staring State in the face.
6-6 give or take a game.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:50 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
Why are all of you assuming Texas A&M in Starkville is a given loss?
You are confusing "likely" loss with a "given" loss.
Sure, it's possible MSU could beat A&M. And, it's possible that Ole Miss beats MSU. It's extremely likely that MSU ends up 1-1 from these two games.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 6:00 pm to Slippery Slope
quote:
12-0 with wins against everyone.
13-0. Then the world will end before State gets to play in the BCSNCG.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 6:04 pm to BulioBones
quote:
aubarn
Lolololololololololololililololloljkokbgftyjvxdrjbhijfdrghvjjihbnjufsweguoivxfhh5685544855:;@%(_#', 9548,,. 85;_+ 5.'@$)) /(_-+ 6557841236800097959;:vhllneavjjgv
Lol
Posted on 12/28/11 at 6:14 pm to Nortizzle
quote:
Lolololololololololololililololloljkokbgftyjvxdrjbhijfdrghvjjihbnjufsweguoivxfhh5685544855:;@%(_#', 9548,,. 85;_+ 5.'@$)) /(_-+ 6557841236800097959;:vhllneavjjgv
You just gave me a virus
Posted on 12/28/11 at 6:28 pm to deltaland
Sorry, I've just never read something as hilarious as that was before.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News