Started By
Message

re: Stanford vs the SEC : for all the blowhards saying how good the PAC is.

Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:10 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260352 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:10 am to
quote:

LSU fans cannot stand excuses...but I never seen more when they explain the Clemson loss.


Whoa chief. You obviously didn't read the Rant following the Clemson loss.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:12 am to
quote:

CU is 2-0 and Utah beat BYU. He'll, Wazzu went Auburn and couged their way to a loss. Not sure your bottom feeders are much better.

There is NO way anybody not named Stanford or Oregano have a chance at beating Georgia, Alabama, LSU, TAMU, Florida, Ole Miss, Vandy.

The aforementioned fourth best, would be finishing tenth, in a consolidated league with no divisions.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40883 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:15 am to
quote:

There is NO way anybody not named Stanford or Oregano have a chance at beating Georgia, Alabama, LSU, TAMU, Florida, Ole Miss, Vandy.



Damn dude, take of your homer glasses. There are plenty of teams in the Pac-12 that could beat Ole Miss and definitely Vandy.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:18 am to
He spoke of their fourth best. I´d take Vandy or Ole Miss over Arizona State.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40883 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:23 am to
Arizona St would beat the hell out of Vandy. I would bet they would beat Ole Miss if the game was in Tempe.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:23 am to
It's probably more than 8-9. Stanford has NFL talent two deep in spots like some SEC teams. I have seen both Safeties in round two, some think Carter could be the first cb in 2015, Skov, Tarpley, and Gardner are the stars in the front seven but they are loaded. I know that guys like Hemschoot and Shittu are future stars just biding their time.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:35 am to
quote:

Have you looked where Stanford's defense projects in the NFL?


Yes and it's not on the same level as lsu or bama. Stanford and Oregon do not have equal talent to bama, lsu and Uf. There is nothing that supports your claim. The nfl draft and recruiting sites( the place where people get paid to rank talent) prove my point.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:36 am to
quote:

Right, we ran 100 plays and dominated every aspect of that game with our star WR injured.


I hope this is a joke. You won by one point. You didn't dominate anything.

And you needed a miracle 4& a mile to beat an lsu team that was missing 3 starting oline man, starting rb, two starting lbs , and a starting cb. Congrats.
This post was edited on 9/28/13 at 1:38 am
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:43 am to
quote:

LSU fans cannot stand excuses...but I never seen more when they explain the Clemson loss.


It's not an excuse. It's reality. That game meant more to Clemson ( by a ton) than it did to lsu. Lsu plays for conf and national titles. The chik filet bowl means shite to lsu players and coaches. Especially when you have 12 juniors trying to make it to the nfl without an injury. That's just reality. Clemson's program saw it as a Super Bowl , while lsu's program thought making the Chik Filet bowl as a failure.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:46 am to
Recruiting sites...dafuq?

I have seen Stanford players littered all over 2014 big boards though...
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:54 am to
quote:

Recruiting sites...dafuq? I have seen Stanford players littered all over 2014 big boards though...


If you think Stanford has as much nfl talent on defense as lsu , bama or uf, you're dumb. Period. I'm not saying Stanford isn't talented, because they are. But they don't have a much talent as the top tier sec team( top5-10 recruiting classes every year). Sorry but it's true.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 2:07 am to
Richards and Reynolds are 2nd round prospects at Safety. Carter is a top 3, maybe #1 cb, in 2015 (he is a true sophomore). The other cb is 5 star Lyons. That is just their secondary, which doesn't include Browning and the nicklebacker.

I know LSU's roster. I have watched three full games and one last week in Louisiana with a circle jerk going on and no one noticing the arse raping Stanford was giving ASU.

I also watched Stanford. Their defense is more talented THIS year.

Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 2:14 am to
quote:

FootballNostradamus
The common Clemson fan, folks. Dickriding another conference to show the SEC isn't top notch.
quote:

Lol, please don't tell me there are 4 or 6 teams in the SEC you think would beat Stanford. If so that's the dumbest thing I've ever read.

Just as dumb as you saying there aren't. Bama, LSU, A&M, Florida, USC, and Georgia could all beat Stanford. Would they? Not sure, just depends on where/when the game was played.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:12 am to
quote:

He spoke of their fourth best. I´d take Vandy or Ole Miss over Arizona State.


Lol, ASU would beat Vandy's brains in.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:12 am to
quote:

If you think Stanford has as much nfl talent on defense as lsu , bama or uf, you're dumb. Period. I'm not saying Stanford isn't talented, because they are. But they don't have a much talent as the top tier sec team( top5-10 recruiting classes every year). Sorry but it's true.


I'll make any bet you want Stanford has more individuals off its current defense drafted than LSU does off their current defense.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:13 am to
quote:

The common Clemson fan, folks. Dickriding another conference to show the SEC isn't top notch.


Gamecock fans would know a thing or two about dickriding a conference they've never done a thing for.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:21 am to
quote:

I hope this is a joke. You won by one point. You didn't dominate anything.


-You had 8 three-and-outs

-You had 219 yards to Clemson's 445 yards

-You ran 49 plays to Clemson's 100 plays

-Clemson gifted you 10 points with fumbles inside the 30 yardline

-You were sacked 6 times

-You held the ball 23 minutes to Clemson's 36 minutes

The game wasn't half as close as the final score. I haven't once ran my mouth about that game, but some LSU fans are laughable.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:23 am to
quote:

I'll make any bet you want Stanford has more individuals off its current defense drafted than LSU does off their current defense.


Yeah because I'm sure you'd pay up. You're an idiot if you think Stanford has more nfl talent I defense than lsu. Period.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46625 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:24 am to
quote:

Right, we ran 100 plays and dominated every aspect of that game with our star WR injured.


You show how little you know about cfb with this statement.
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75429 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 4:38 am to
quote:

If Stanford is so great how come we never see them playing a SEC school to really know?




Get the frick out with this...
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter