Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:40 pm to deltaland
Damn what happened to that grass?
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:40 pm to volfan30
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:41 pm to MedDawg
Rushel Shell picked Pitt over Alabama for that. 
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:43 pm to volfan30
quote:
Arkansas
had 45,250 officially
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:43 pm to busey
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:49 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Damn what happened to that grass?
They had to set up the stage in the end zone for the concert so it messed it up... and after today they are tearing it up and redoing the turf so I imagine they haven't been tending to it as much as that would be a waste of money.
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:49 pm to TT9
Here was Mizzou's spring game. Sorry, best picture I could find quickly.
They had about 19,000 attendance, which isn't terrible turn out considering the weather that day...
This post was edited on 4/21/12 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:51 pm to busey
quote:
Because THIS is the year that UT doesn't suck. Just like the last two were supposed to be!
Lol what? I think everyone knew we were going to suck year 1 under Dooley and most people realized our roster was even worse last year.
Posted on 4/21/12 at 6:53 pm to volfan30
Because of what coach fricking you?
Come on,you can say it....
Come on,you can say it....
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:03 pm to TT9
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:07 pm to volfan30
So would you be OK with erasing 1998 if it meant never having Fat Phil, and being in a better position currently (but never having won a NC)?
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:12 pm to busey
No.
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:13 pm to volfan30
Then I'd say having him for as long as y'all did was a net gain, no?
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:13 pm to busey
1998 has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Fulmer got complacent in his latter years at UT. I'll take a 1990s Phil Fulmer all day everyday.
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:14 pm to volfan30
Yes,but Kiffin fricked you guys worse than Fran fricked Bama....
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:15 pm to psk_Vol
So your AD fricked up by not firing him promptly enough?
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:16 pm to busey
Yes. Should have been fired after 05.
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:20 pm to volfan30
None of it falls on Kiffin or Dooley?
Posted on 4/21/12 at 7:20 pm to busey
The game passed by Fulmer, he should have been forced to "retire" after the 2005 debacle, but kept his job because of his previous acheivments. Lane Kiffin would have won big here, but unusual circumstances pushed him out of here, and consequently the program suffered from his departure.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News