Started By
Message

Since everyone always says Nutt won with O's players, is
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:09 pm
Mullen winning with Croom's players? Croom may not have won many games but he left the program on solid footing when he left.
State won this year with some good junior and senior leadership that were Croom's recruits. Funny how no one ever talks about the prior coach being the reason for success unless Nutt is the one taking over.
I will give Mullen credit, he is a good coach. But lets not give O all of our credit for Ole Miss's success in 2008 & 2009.
State won this year with some good junior and senior leadership that were Croom's recruits. Funny how no one ever talks about the prior coach being the reason for success unless Nutt is the one taking over.
I will give Mullen credit, he is a good coach. But lets not give O all of our credit for Ole Miss's success in 2008 & 2009.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:12 pm to GreyReb
You mean like Vick Ballard, Chad Bumphis, LaDarius Perkins, Chris Smith, Brandon Heavens, Pernell McPhee, Fletcher Cox, Josh Boyd, Johnathan Banks, Wade Bonner, Cam Lawrence, Chris White, etc?
Not to mention all the players from Crooms that have drastically improved over the past two years.
Not to mention all the players from Crooms that have drastically improved over the past two years.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:13 pm to GreyReb
Dude it's not worth it. Lose with dignity and get ready for basketball season.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:14 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
Dude it's not worth it. Lose with dignity and get ready for basketball season.
Who said chivalry was dead.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:14 pm to NIH
NIH, I am giving Mullen credit, but most bash Nutt as if he had nothing to do with 2008 & 2009.
We definitely had some major improvement with those that O had left as well as having some freshmen and sophomores contributing.
Relf is a senior. And I think a majority of your OL is upperclassmen.
We definitely had some major improvement with those that O had left as well as having some freshmen and sophomores contributing.
Relf is a senior. And I think a majority of your OL is upperclassmen.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:15 pm to sawfiddle
MSU won because of a favorable schedule. They didnt beat anyone good. They won 1 division game and did not one single team currently ranked in the top 25.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:17 pm to GreyReb
Everyone in the SEC wants you to keep Nutt around, so no need take up for his shitastic season. 

Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:18 pm to Music City Hog
quote:
MSU won because of a favorable schedule. They didnt beat anyone good. They won 1 division game and did not one single team currently ranked in the top 25.
Mullen is 0-8 against SEC West schools not named Ole Miss in his 2 years in Starkville.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:19 pm to Music City Hog
So? Being 8-4 with a favorable schedule is much better than being 4-8 with a more favorable schedule.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:19 pm to GreyReb
How many teams did State beat that are going to a bowl? Is Florida it?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:19 pm to GreyReb
quote:
Mullen is 0-8 against SEC West schools not named Ole Miss in his 2 years in Starkville.
how DARE YOU sir. Mullen is the best coach in the history of college football and he is coach of the year this year. Ask any Mississippi State fan.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:20 pm to GreyReb
all those teams he lost to were better than his right now. Next season and 2012 is when it really becomes Mullens' teams in terms of recruits as they get to be juniors, RS sophs, RS freshmen, etc.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:21 pm to OleMissRebel
The teams that MSU BEAT had a combined record of 38-52.
MSU is much better than last year, but it is somewhat smoke and mirrors. Florida (7-5) is the only team MSU beat that had a winning record.
MSU is much better than last year, but it is somewhat smoke and mirrors. Florida (7-5) is the only team MSU beat that had a winning record.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:21 pm to GreyReb
quote:
How many teams did State beat that are going to a bowl? Is Florida it?
and? would you rather be 8-4 or 4-8? 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, etc. years from now the record books will read 8-4.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:23 pm to NIH
quote:
Next season and 2012 is when it really becomes Mullens' teams in terms of recruits as they get to be juniors, RS sophs, RS freshmen, etc.
So NIH, you are admitting these really aren't Mullen's teams the past 2 years.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:23 pm to Music City Hog
quote:
but it is somewhat smoke and mirrors
how? The main difference was the defense which improved in every statistical category. Rushing was static and turnover margin was better. that's what got better. pretty simple though i see youre trying to kiss some Rebel arse here.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:24 pm to GreyReb
quote:
So NIH, you are admitting these really aren't Mullen's teams the past 2 years
No, what I mean is that the players he recruited for to play in the spread option will be older and in more control of this team.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:28 pm to GreyReb
quote:
Relf is a senior
MSU won despite Relf IMO.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:29 pm to BurtReynoldsMustache
he's also a junior.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:30 pm to GreyReb
Yes Mullen is winning with Croom's players. But, he's is adding in his own quality players. Nutt hasn't and won't do that.
Popular
Back to top
