Started By
Message

re: Should Gus accept 2 million a year for the next 20 years

Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

This is exactly what Texas Tech did to Mike Leach. A decade later, Texas Tech has a shitty program that can't keep head coaches that aren't alumni



Fixed that for you.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

There may be other circumstances involved. There are clauses in all those contracts as well.


Clauses? What kind of clauses allows you to decide not to honor the contract outside of moral deficiencies? I would find it difficult to believe there is a clause that says we will pay you the buout unless you don't coach very well. I mean, the whole reason for the contract was because Auburn thought he was a good coach.

In all honesty....what coach do you think would take that job if Auburn does not honor the contract, and tries to get out of it without the buyout?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Auburn wouldn't argue whether or not they did Gus dirty, they'd argue that Gus doesn't have the right to sue the government.


And you would be hiring high school coaches for the next 20 years. Who would go to Auburn to coach knowing that the contract isn't worth the paper it is written on?

Auburn will either honor the contract, or honor the payout. Auburn might be able to negotiate a smaller amount, but I doubt they go to court to do that.
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
13406 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:52 pm to
hence, why Gus would take a major reduction in buy out vs. high legal costs of stringing this out for years.... in addition, Leath will probably be fired for inept decision making relating to this issue as well. Solving 2 major AU problems with relative ease.
This post was edited on 10/18/18 at 1:28 pm
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Your Honor! We offered Coach Malzahn $49 Million dollars with a full buyout, but we changed our mind, so we want you to change the terms we agreed to and offered, so we won't have to give him the money we offered him!"? Is that what they are wanting to do? that will go over really well with a judge.


Sovereign Immunity. Google it
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

hence, why Gus would take a major reduction in buy vs. high legal costs of stringing this out for years.... in addition, Leath will probably be fired for inept decision making relating to this issue as well. Solving 2 major AU problems with relative ease.


Yeah but how it will work is the AD is fired this offeason and then the coach is fired the next offseason so the new AD can pick the coach.

The concept that everyone gets fired in a single offseason doesn't line up to reality.
Posted by luvdoc
"Please Ignore Our Yelp Reviews"
Member since May 2005
917 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Sovereign Immunity. Google it


Seems a rather open ended search. Can someone give me the Cliffs on this proposed legal remedy, as relevant to this discussion?

Is it as simple as a claim that governments cannot be sued, even when in violation of a contract they entered into willingly? Seems like a hell of a Pandora's box to me.
Posted by Gulf Coast Grinder
Member since May 2014
224 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

He should take whatever he can. Boosters are apparently willing to go to court to adjust his buyout

I'm sure decent coaches would be lining up to take a job that just screwed the previous coach out of an agreed upon buyout. Especially any Jimmy Sexton clients and he rules the SEC...
Posted by GlossuRabban
West Cobb
Member since Apr 2018
2570 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

n addition, Leath will probably be fired for inept decision making relating to this issue as well.

I hope so.
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37296 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Sovereign Immunity. Google it


I did, good luck using that tactic.
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6541 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

If Auburn claims they fired him with cause, Gus' only recourse would be to sue Auburn in the court system. In Court, Auburn then can claim sovereign immunity.

Auburn wouldn't argue whether or not they did Gus dirty, they'd argue that Gus doesn't have the right to sue the government.

This is exactly what Texas Tech did to Mike Leach. A decade later, Leach is still trying and losing lawsuits to get his money.

Holy shite, this is the dumbest idea I have heard out of you guys. Who the frick would ever sign a contract with Auburn after this?

Texas Tech got fricking reamed by a horrifyingly shitty Ole Miss team. That happened and will continue to happen because Kingsbury is the only coach willing to take the Texas Tech job.

On second thought this is an excellent plan, Auburn! Please pursue this method to get rid of Gus!
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
13406 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:28 pm to
current AD had nothing to do with that contract.... educate yourself prior to proving yourself an idiot via trolling
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

hence, why Gus would take a major reduction in buy out vs. high legal costs of stringing this out for years....

Again. If Auburn takes this to court, they lose.....bigly. Nobody would go to Auburn knowing Auburn will not honor a contract, and fights a buyout.
The very purpose of a buyout is to protect the coach financially in case he gets fired. If Auburn fights that no coach will go to Auburn.

Can you name one school has fought against a buyout unless there were extenuating circumstances? And, no. Losing games is not an extenuating circumstance.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Sovereign Immunity. Google it


Sovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a legal doctrine by which the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution. This principle is commonly expressed by the popular legal maxim "rex non potest peccare," meaning "the king can do no wrong."

Believe it or not...Auburn is not the government.
Are you saying you have never heard of a college being sued?

Students sue colleges all the time

This post was edited on 10/18/18 at 1:36 pm
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Seems a rather open ended search. Can someone give me the Cliffs on this proposed legal remedy, as relevant to this discussion?

Is it as simple as a claim that governments cannot be sued, even when in violation of a contract they entered into willingly? Seems like a hell of a Pandora's box to me.




The problem with their assertion is that colleges can and have been sued. Often. They are not the government and they do not enjoy Sovereignty Immunity. It is something someone on an Auburn message board came up with...it only shows desperation.
Posted by luvdoc
"Please Ignore Our Yelp Reviews"
Member since May 2005
917 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

It is something someone on an Auburn message board came up with


Is it, though? Previous posters have suggested that Texas tech used it successfully, though likely to their own detriment in the long run.
Posted by GlossuRabban
West Cobb
Member since Apr 2018
2570 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Believe it or not...Auburn is not the government.


Yeah we are, bitch

Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Yeah we are, bitch

Bet I can find a link saying you are not subject to Sovereign Immunity.

So, I guess that rules out the inherent disadvantage Auburn has for not being a state school, or is that wrapped up only in not being able to say University of Auburn?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Is it, though? Previous posters have suggested that Texas tech used it successfully, though likely to their own detriment in the long run.



It is in this case. Texas Tech used it because Leach was accused of mistreatment of players. No accusations to date have been leveled at Malzahn. Good luck trying that defense.

The second thing is Texas tech is a state school. So that is a different situation altogether.
Auburn fans have claimed they are not a state school, so....

Here is the situation with Leach and Texas tech:
Texas Tech is a state school, so it gets the same legal protections the rest of the Texas government gets. Texas has a strict sovereign immunity law, which says Leach can only sue the school in the state if he gets the Texas legislature’s permission.
LINK

Auburn is not protected under the Sovereign Immunity clause because they are not a state school.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Believe it or not...Auburn is not the government.


quote:

Yeah we are, bitch


Are you a state school?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter