re: Sheridan is dropping bombs on Finebaum right now...

quote:

---

Do you actually think it's by pure chance that it all went down at once?

---

Who all went down at once?

Also, do you think the FBI would hand over any information they have DURING their trial/investigation. Once this trial is over they MIGHT hand over any info they have to the NCAA. That's saying if they have anything to give them. I don't even know if that kind of information exists.

quote:

---

Link? I ask because all I can find is the original story on TMZ, which was then reported by other news sources and quickly dropped. Bond's attorney claims the FBI requested to interview him, and whether they did or not I have no idea. That's the extent of any known FBI involvement in the recruitment of Cam Newton.

---

LOL.. seriously man.. run a dang search. I really don't care if you believe it or not.

John Bond HAS met with

quote:

---

MOBILE, Alabama - An attorney for the former Mississippi State player who helped spark the NCAA's investigation of Auburn quarterback Cam Newton says his client has been interviewed by the FBI. Phil Abernethy wrote in an e-mail Tuesday to The Associated Press that John Bond met with federal and state investigators and "cooperated fully with both agencies." Abernethy says Bond would have no further comment because of the "ongoing nature" of the investigation. The FBI has declined comment.

---

quote:

---

ESPN!

---

And in that second quote you posted, who did ESPN cite as the source? You seemed to leave that part off as I recall.

quote:

---

Also, do you think the FBI would hand over any information they have DURING their trial/investigation. Once this trial is over they MIGHT hand over any info they have to the NCAA. That's saying if they have anything to give them. I don't even know if that kind of information exists.

---

Exactly.. who knows what they have or don't have. HOWEVER, they did interviews about the recruitment of Cam. Nobody can say they have not. The question is why would they be or get involved?

#1- WE know that the Newton's are shady people. At best. (And don't give me this "Cam didn't know" bullshite either- no one is that dumb.)Cecil was in on a scam to get money from miss st.

#2- WE know that the NCAA is investigating Auburn, and have been for the last eight months. Can anyone else point to an ivestigation that lasted this long and came up with nothng?

#3- Doyel can say what he wants doubting Sherridan, but the man lasted 25 years in Vegas. You don't last that long in Vegas unless you produce. And no, Doyel, oddsmakers having sources are not a big story. Oddsmakers have sources all over the country, and everyone knows it.

#4- Doyel didn't counteract Sherridan's statements with "My own sources tell me that's bullshite" which right away lets people know that he has no sources on the situation, and his rantings come off as gut feeling rather than based on anything solid. Sherridan said he had sources. Is he lying? What would he gain? He makes money as an oddsmaker and his odds columns are not more likely to be read if he's commenting on a football scandal. The people who read those columns are gamblers, nothing more.

#5- Auburn may indeed be found not guilty by the ncaa. But that's hardly the same as Auburn not having done anything. If they were truly innocent, the ncaa would have run into brick walls as soon as they got on campus, all avenues would have lead to dead ends, and the investigation would be over. Its not over. They have found enough leads to keep them thre 8 plus months. If they were truly innocent, there would not have been enough there to keep the ncaa on campus for 8 months.

#6- The whole "where's your evidence?" and "they have nothing nothing concrete on us" reeks of a rogue program saying "catch me if you can."

#7- Calling one of the most respected oddsmakers in America a "bammer" in an attempt to discredit him is pathetically redneck. If you really think Sherridan would take time out from his Vegas job just to pick on Auburn, I really dont know what to tell you, other than to grow a brain and get a life.


#8- The ncaa may not be able to find enough evidence of Auburn paying Newton to warrant a punishment. But that doesnt mean it didnt happen. I think, in all liklihood, after Chizik's pathetic comments in Destin and Sherridan on Finebaum, that it did happen. Auburn may not be punished for it, but it in all liklihood occured.


PS- to the genius who said we build museums to the guys who got us on probation. WE have one museum, to one man, and im pretty sure we werent on probation at anytime from 1958-1982.

quote:

---

Also, do you think the FBI would hand over any information they have DURING their trial/investigation. Once this trial is over they MIGHT hand over any info they have to the NCAA. That's saying if they have anything to give them. I don't even know if that kind of information exists.

---

Not the ATPB thread.

quote:

---

im sorry but you people with these theories are fricking idiots

---

They're hoping. Their one wish in life is for Auburn to go down.

quote:

---

This is the funniest thing I have ever read. They NCAA may not prove AU is guilty, but the fact that they investigated so long, left no stone unturned and then failed to prove AU was guilty proves they were guilty of something.

---

This doesn't surprise you, does it?

I've decided I don't want Auburn to get caught. For a while I wanted them to burn, but now I realize it will only give the SEC a black eye. The rest of the country is waiting for proof that the SEC cheats.It would explain why they can't beat us. I would prefer if they never got it. So keep on keeping on Barners. Everyone assumes you are guilty, but they can't prove a thing. I hope Cecil and Cam never talk and the bagman moves far away.