re: SEC with potentially 3 teams in CFP?

quote:

---

quote:
How is beating Alabama a better win than beating Texas A&M when Texas A&M makes the playoff and Alabama doesn't in this scenario?


You can’t be this dumb can you? In no scenario whatsoever would a win over A&M be better than a win over Alabama. We would be talking about 2 1 loss teams one of which beat the other by 30 head to head. I don’t care if they dropped Alabama to 10 and moved A&M to 4. I still won’t be and never will be a better win unless Bama loses out which isn’t happening.

You must be an Old Sarge alter.

---

This is the problem with a forum where people just read one post and respond instead of following the logic of the thread.

Here's what happened:

1. Muthsera claimed that Texas A&M should go to the playoff over Alabama if Florida beats Alabama in the SECCG despite the head-to-head, which he says doesn't matter much.
2. I mocked his argument by saying Alabama should go over Florida even if Florida beats Alabama in the SECCG despite the head-to-head since head-to-head doesn't matter.
3. Muthsera responds by saying that, no, in that case Florida would have the better win (over Alabama) compared to Alabama (over Texas A&M). So what he's saying is that beating Alabama is a better win that Texas A&M even though Texas A&M should be in the playoff over Alabama. It's that inconsistency I was asking him about.

But thanks for calling me dumb. It hurt my feelings for a second until I looked my diplomas.