Started By
Message
SEC Teams : 1st Round Picks last 10 years (since 2010 draft)
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:10 am
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:10 am
How does it correlate to success? Any of these surprising?
1. Alabama (28)
2. Florida (13)
3. LSU (10)
4. Georgia (9)
4. Texas A&M (9)
6. Missouri (6)
7. Mississippi State (5)
7. Tennessee (5)
9. Auburn (4)
9. Ole Miss (4)
9. South Carolina (4)
12. Kentucky (2)
13. Arkansas (1)
14. Vanderbilt (0)
I'm a little surprised that Auburn has only had 4. They've recruited at a high level for the entire decade, kind of figured they'd be in the 7-10 range.
Missouri with 6 is impressive.
1. Alabama (28)
2. Florida (13)
3. LSU (10)
4. Georgia (9)
4. Texas A&M (9)
6. Missouri (6)
7. Mississippi State (5)
7. Tennessee (5)
9. Auburn (4)
9. Ole Miss (4)
9. South Carolina (4)
12. Kentucky (2)
13. Arkansas (1)
14. Vanderbilt (0)
I'm a little surprised that Auburn has only had 4. They've recruited at a high level for the entire decade, kind of figured they'd be in the 7-10 range.
Missouri with 6 is impressive.
This post was edited on 4/26/19 at 9:40 am
15
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:12 am to SummerOfGeorge
Wow!
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:13 am to MykTide
quote:
MykTide
Damn it, come on. This thread isn't for that shite.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:13 am to SummerOfGeorge
Stolen for first page of the draft thread. Thanks SoG. 
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:14 am to SummerOfGeorge
I couldn’t name the 5 first rounders we’ve had and I somewhat doubt that number is accurate
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:15 am to SummerOfGeorge
Dang. Auburn is a Top 10 recruiter and Ole Miss a Top 20 recruiter.
Goes to show that ya never know
Goes to show that ya never know
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:15 am to SummerOfGeorge
Missouir and AU are the only ones that are a real "surprise", for opposite reasons.
Vanderbilt may be a teeny tiny surprise, since there was a stretch there a while back where it seemed like every few years they'd have a stud that could potentially be 1st round material (jordan matthews, zach cunningham, etc). Although it's still vandy so not a total surprise they have 0.
Vanderbilt may be a teeny tiny surprise, since there was a stretch there a while back where it seemed like every few years they'd have a stud that could potentially be 1st round material (jordan matthews, zach cunningham, etc). Although it's still vandy so not a total surprise they have 0.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:16 am to sand mountainDvalues
quote:
5 first rounders we’ve had and I somewhat doubt that number is accurate
Eric Berry
Dan Williams
Cordarrelle Patterson
Ja'Wuan James
Derek Barnett
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:17 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Vanderbilt may be a teeny tiny surprise, since there was a stretch there a while back where it seemed like every few years they'd have a stud that could potentially be 1st round material (jordan matthews, zach cunningham, etc). Although it's still vandy so not a total surprise they have 0.
Yea I expected one of those guys to have been a 1st round pick. Cunningham was 2nd, Matthews was 2nd, Hayward was 2nd.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:18 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Much like the Alabama fanbase.
(since 2010)
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:20 am to SummerOfGeorge
And we have frickING NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT.
Jesus it feels like we are Georgia now. All this talent...and no titles.
Mullen...Bring us back to glory please.
Jesus it feels like we are Georgia now. All this talent...and no titles.
Mullen...Bring us back to glory please.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:22 am to SummerOfGeorge
should be at #7.
Also, I want to say mizzou was top 3 up till about 3 years ago.
Also, I want to say mizzou was top 3 up till about 3 years ago.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:25 am to mizslu314
Missouri was good till they got in the SEC! 
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:29 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
I'm a little surprised that Auburn has only had 4.
Not really when you consider the timeframe. We were only good 2 or 3 years during that stretch.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:30 am to AA7
quote:
Not really when you consider the timeframe. We were only good 2 or 3 years during that stretch.
But there were some good players even on the so-so teams. And a lot of highly recruited players.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:35 am to SummerOfGeorge
If you have 3 on one team, does that mean you should win more than 8 games? Just out of curiosity
Apparently I have "too high" of expectations to ask for a top 3 SEC West Finish at minimum if you have that.
And for our offensive gurus. We had a borderline 1st round OL that will be taken in the 2nd round, and a returning 1000 rusher that was limited because coach wanted a pass happy offense.
And for all the people blaming Fitz. It was Moorheads decision to keep him as starter. And if it was all Fitz's fault, we should have all of our problems fixed with KT
Apparently I have "too high" of expectations to ask for a top 3 SEC West Finish at minimum if you have that.
And for our offensive gurus. We had a borderline 1st round OL that will be taken in the 2nd round, and a returning 1000 rusher that was limited because coach wanted a pass happy offense.
And for all the people blaming Fitz. It was Moorheads decision to keep him as starter. And if it was all Fitz's fault, we should have all of our problems fixed with KT
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:39 am to SummerOfGeorge
is this since the 2010 season or the 2010 draft (2009 season)?
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:40 am to autodd03
quote:
2010 draft
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:41 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
And a lot of highly recruited players.
Unfortunately a lot of those washed out of Auburn
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:43 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
But there were some good players even on the so-so teams.
Yeah but you know that “good” doesn’t get you in the first round, you have to be elite and we just didn’t have many of those guys.
quote:
And a lot of highly recruited players.
Because we suck at player development
We will have at least one more next year with our DL and potentially Tega is things click for him.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News