Started By
Message
re: SEC Risk Analysis - Case Against Texas in SEC - an honest discussion, please
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:12 pm to Turf Taint
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:12 pm to Turf Taint
honestly the only risk is the big 6 kicks texas out or they leave for not being able to compete.
off the field, some of their SJW bullshite may wear off but thats it.
BAMA, LSU, UGA, UF are stronger than they are and lets say even if A&M and OU teamed with Texas, the whole big 6 would come down on them with a quickness.
this isnt a merger with the big 8 to form the big 12 who needed texas. this isnt the swc who needed texas. We dont need shite. Not for recruiting, not for money, not for prestige, not for scheduling.....not for shite.
off the field, some of their SJW bullshite may wear off but thats it.
BAMA, LSU, UGA, UF are stronger than they are and lets say even if A&M and OU teamed with Texas, the whole big 6 would come down on them with a quickness.
this isnt a merger with the big 8 to form the big 12 who needed texas. this isnt the swc who needed texas. We dont need shite. Not for recruiting, not for money, not for prestige, not for scheduling.....not for shite.
1
Posted on 7/23/21 at 4:16 pm to lsu777
Not to let facts get in the way, but Aggy pushed for and voted for unequal revenue sharing. Texas gave up their extra portion. A&M refused and kept the larger payout while UT and Neb did not.
Carry on
Carry on
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News