Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/28/24 at 2:27 pm to McMillan
Thanks for checking our schedule. I don’t know who missouri plays first. Just know their first 4 games are against local middle schools
Posted on 4/28/24 at 2:53 pm to Jrv2damac
Posted on 4/28/24 at 3:51 pm to Jrv2damac
"middle schools" who could still clean kansas' clock.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 3:51 pm to DirtyCreekBottoms
quote:
You just said you don't have to be fast to be good and then that he would need to put on 20 to 30 pounds for size reasons but that might hurt his speed lol
I don't even like him abd especially not Mizzou but he has things that can't be taught.
I can see opposing fans not liking Mizzou. By the way I love that. I hope every opposing fanbase hates us.
But, it's pretty fvcking hard to not like Cody Schrader. The guy is everything that is good about college football.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 6:11 pm to dchog
quote:
What hurts Schrader is his weight at 183 which isn't heavy enough to carry the rock in the NFL. He could gain 20-30 pounds but could lose his current speed. I would put him at a different position.
You never know, I never would have thought Peyton Hillis would have been the most notable player from the backfield of him, McFadden and Jones.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 6:59 pm to Clark14
Hillis weighed 250 pounds and ran a 4.57 40.
That is fast for his weight but more importantly the almost 70 pound advantage allows him to absorb more beatings as he runs through the gaps.
I would put Schrader at the slot position as his smaller size would do better undetected in traffic.
That is fast for his weight but more importantly the almost 70 pound advantage allows him to absorb more beatings as he runs through the gaps.
I would put Schrader at the slot position as his smaller size would do better undetected in traffic.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:34 pm to dchog
Schrader's main assets are:
1. Hits holes quickly. No dancing in his game. Makes up for lack of speed.
2. Identifies holes quickly. He's smart.
3. He falls forward a lot on contact.
4. He's a good receiver.
5. He doesn't fumble.
Also, he's 214, not 183 or whatever. And 5'9.
He has been counted out a lot in his football life. I wouldn't count him out in SF.
1. Hits holes quickly. No dancing in his game. Makes up for lack of speed.
2. Identifies holes quickly. He's smart.
3. He falls forward a lot on contact.
4. He's a good receiver.
5. He doesn't fumble.
Also, he's 214, not 183 or whatever. And 5'9.
He has been counted out a lot in his football life. I wouldn't count him out in SF.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:35 pm to DirtyCreekBottoms
I don't have anything against him but putting a 180 pound running back as starter in the NFL is suicide. Yes putting on weight could hurt his speed as he doesn't have the body frame to put on a lot of weight.
Arkansas had a RB the name of Fred Talley, 5-7 180 and he was the toughest runner that I have ever seen. But the problem is that was never healthy for a full season due to injuries. He went undrafted concerning he could be injury prone as a result of his size.
If I was him, I would play a different position.
Arkansas had a RB the name of Fred Talley, 5-7 180 and he was the toughest runner that I have ever seen. But the problem is that was never healthy for a full season due to injuries. He went undrafted concerning he could be injury prone as a result of his size.
If I was him, I would play a different position.
Posted on 4/28/24 at 7:44 pm to iconucon
Ok so he did beef up so that is good.
Those extra pounds will make a difference.
That should be a good weight for his frame as some of the best RBs are at that weight.
Those extra pounds will make a difference.
That should be a good weight for his frame as some of the best RBs are at that weight.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News