Started By
Message

re: SEC divisional games to stay at 8---permanent rivals may be gone.

Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:48 am to
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:48 am to
quote:

see i knew someone would come use that reasoning, but everyone mistakes the SEC East of now and the SEC east of past and well AU would have about the same success if you asked me


i don't think we'd fair any better or you guys any worse. Just saying that the game as a divisional game (for both teams) makes the road a bit more difficult.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:49 am to
eh, it may make it a little tougher but i don't think UGA or UF would block it ya know?
quote:

hunter

yea, it would mess that all up amirite?
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 9:50 am
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I'd rather lose Auburn, than Tennessee


we know.

regale us all with tales about bear bryant and genral neyland
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:52 am to
quote:


eh, it may make it a little tougher but i don't think UGA or UF would block it ya know?


oh i don't even know if yall were the schools, and really wasn't trying to stick my nose in that one, just adding to the part where, while i'd like to be in the east, i do think it would make the east a bit more difficult to win.
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
10988 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:53 am to


Screw Mizzou and a&m
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150253 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:53 am to
quote:

i do think it would make the east a bit more difficult to win.


Yes, but it beats going to MizzU. Frick that noise.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:53 am to
oh definitely, i just think Georgia's road would be the same which what i said to nite. the east would be tighter but hell every time we play yall we have to win anyway. our game has decided who won the east/west so many times, why not make it the east title these days right?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:55 am to
In honesty, it would probably do Auburn good to not have to play Bama every year. The perception of being the lesser school in the state would diminish somewhat, and think of the hype if Bama and Au met in the SEC Championship game with that and a NC berth on the line.
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 9:57 am
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:56 am to
quote:

why not make it the east title these days right?


im on board.
Posted by starkag
Member since Oct 2011
446 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:56 am to
A&M fan here who wants the permanent rivals. Give us Mizzou, I don't care. 1 rotating and 1 permanent would work fine. I sure hope that doesn't go away, I don't want this hanging over our head forever.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:57 am to
quote:

it would probably do Auburn good to not have to play Bama every year


it would do humanity good. Or did you not watch the espn special and hang your head in shame?

and you're still a master of backhanded comments.
Posted by fwinkerbean
T,e,double n,e,double s,double e
Member since Jan 2012
21 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:57 am to
quote:

yea i am waiting on that link too. adding AU to the east would make shite easier, we are fine with it. i thought it was Bammer having a conniption


I don't think Bama gives a shite what teams are in each division. It's a dumbass idea to get rid of traditional rivalries though.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:58 am to
true, if we lost the deep south's oldest rivalry i'd hold a lotta angst against you rooks
quote:

fwinker

only reason i said that was because some wouldn't want to choose between bama playing UT or AU

i say just send them west, other than UF no one will miss them
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 10:00 am
Posted by AUnite
The Tragic City
Member since Nov 2010
14828 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Hunter

yes, we know. TN is y'alls real rival. Not us dumb fricks in cowville.





This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 10:01 am
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:03 am to
Wow, the SEC is ruining itself. If this happens I hope Bama and UT can play OOC. Knoxville is my favorite road game.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134050 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:06 am to
frick A&M and mizzou for messing things up.

Damn expansion

[/party line]
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:26 am to
Eh, I don't think anybody was unhappy with the SEC the way it was. Its nothing personal.
Posted by justafarmer
Member since Sep 2011
73 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:48 am to
I don't think the schedules will stay this way for long. Maybe 2 to 3 years at most. By that time the SEC will be @ 16 teams and divided into 2 divisions with two 4 team pods each. You'll play all 3 teams from your pod - rotate 2 teams from the other pod within your division - rotate 1 team from each pod in the other division and 1 permanent rival from the other division.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter