Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:446
Registered on:10/16/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Best smartphone for $200

Posted by starkag on 8/25/15 at 4:00 pm
I wasn't using my X all that heavily, I would usually have about 2 hours SOT and end the day around 20-30%. But once I got it on 5.1, it was weird, I would just always end the day with that much battery. I would plug it in at around 25% whether I had 2.5 hours or 1 hour, didn't matter. Definitely weird, but I wasn't using it enough to kill it, so I wasn't concerned.

This battery on the G is awesome though, better than most $600+ flagships. I can't overstate that. If that's your biggest concern, you won't be disappointed with this phone.

EDIT: just remembered one little hiccup I had. The G uses a MicroSim, X used a nano. You'll need an adapter, but you can get them on amazon for less than $5. And if you go that route, DON'T put the empty adapter in the phone, because the hole where the sim card goes will snag the pins and potentially break them. If you put the adapter in, make sure the card is in it. I didn't do this, but I heard stories :lol:

re: Best smartphone for $200

Posted by starkag on 8/25/15 at 1:56 pm
I got the Moto G 2015, coming from the X 2013 like you said. The size jump was bigger than anticipated, but still manageable. It's about the size of a 2014 Moto X (just with bigger bezels/smaller screen), so it's really on the limit of what I can use one handed, but it isn't uncomfortable.

It isn't a flagship device but that's easily overlooked almost everywhere. On the screen, the colors are a little washed out, but that's all I've noticed. Performance may suffer if you're doing hardcore gaming, but for basic use, I haven't noticed any slowness at all, animations and multitasking are super smooth. Camera is much better than I expected, and the battery life is seriously killer. I routinely get a total of 4 hours of screen on time over the course of two days, with power to spare. I haven't tried to kill it in a single day, but I've seen reports of people getting 6 hours SOT.

I can't speak for the other devices you're considering, but I'm confident you won't be disappointed with the G 2015. It really is an upgrade from the X 2013 in every way, except for the display, which is still totally good enough for every day use. I'm very pleased with mine, just be prepared for 2 weeks of shipping, Motorola is having major trouble meeting delivery dates with this phone.

re: **RUMORED** Nintendo E3 Info

Posted by starkag on 6/9/15 at 9:42 am
Uhhh, guys. Take a closer look at the link. It was posted 9 months ago, it comes from "my dad works at nintendo" tumblr, and one of the supposed announcements is Majora's Mask 3D, which was announced 7 months ago and released in february.

There is absolutely 0% chance that this is even sort of real.
There aren't as many dungeons, sure, but I think each one is pretty high quality. When I play LTTP, they all feel so rudimentary compared to later games. LTTP is definitely hard, but not because the dungeons are designed to be particularly difficult (you just take a crap ton of damage from everything).

Also, if Link Between Worlds is any indication, you may have plenty more dungeons to look forward to. When I play that game I think "this must be what LTTP fans remember that game being like back in the day". And LBW is one of my favorites so I know where you're coming from, I just think Nintendo has gotten better at making the dungeons themselves.
You certainly aren't the only one. I'm in the minority, but I just don't find it as enjoyable as some of the newer ones.

There's nothing "wrong" with it, mind you. I just didn't play it as a kid, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it. I don't think it's bad, but I also don't think it's so hard to believe that Nintendo may have, you know, learned how to improve some things in over 20 years. The meat of Link to the Past is the dungeons, and I think they make better dungeons now than they did then.

Again, all just my thoughts, and I know I'm definitely one of few, but you asked.
Historically, Toad. On MK8, I used Yoshi until 200cc came out, then I started using this guy for the acceleration


re: So who has bought Splatoon

Posted by starkag on 6/1/15 at 2:44 pm
I downloaded it Friday, and it's been hard to put it down since. I've been looking forward to it since last E3, and I am not disappointed.

It doesn't feel like it's "lacking in content" to me, but if you need more, it's coming. Tonight at 9:00 CT, the first update is dropping with additional modes, a new stage, and a new weapon. I have heard there are 9 new stages total planned, can't confirm it, but the best part is that it will all be free. There is really no reason to wait to buy this game, so if you are considering it, go do it right now.
I'm so pumped for this game. Already have it pre-installed, can't wait to play. My connection at home is pretty bad, I normally can't play online games without some visible lag, and Smash Bros is completely unplayable. But the test fire ran just as smooth as the offline, singleplayer demo that preceded it.

Also, the Nintendo Treehouse streamed themselves playing the public demo with everyone else, watch for yourself here if you're interested. These guys have been play testing this game for over a year now, and after 10 matches, they had won 5 and lost 5. Doesn't get much more balanced than that, and that has me more excited than anything else.

re: Splatoon Global Testfire

Posted by starkag on 5/9/15 at 1:59 pm
Used the roller for 1 round, didn't do very well. Used the regular splattergun (not Jr.) for probably 5 or 6 rounds, and dominated. Never lost a round, and I routinely got 1st place overall. Once people get used to aiming, the rollers won't seem so overpowered. Still useful, but 4 rollers on a team won't win many matches once people get used to it.

My only reservation for this game was how well the connection held up. Every match ran flawlessly, and my internet is not good. I went from "pretty excited" to "day 1 buy" for sure.
Weighing in: Textra is a one time charge of $1, that's all. No subscription required. I upgraded without thinking twice when they asked me to.

I switched from the stock messenger app (old one, not 5.0 messenger) because it just wouldn't receive probably 2 or 3 messages per day. Switched to Textra because I figured it couldn't work worse, and it looked nice. I have tried others since switching, but always end up back with Textra. It easily has the best design, has every functionality you could want, but doesn't throw it in your face if you don't want it. Try it with ads for free, if you like it, throw them a buck and enjoy :cheers:
How "old" are you talking about here? Is a 4S too old?

re: Textra - Can't retrieve MMS

Posted by starkag on 3/11/15 at 10:26 am
I had this same problem, this fixed it for me.
Go to the phone's settings app (not Textra settings), more, mobile networks, access point names, tap on the phone that shows up. Copy down what they show in MMSC, MMS Proxy, and MMS Proxy Port. Then go back to Textra settings, MMS Settings, check Manually Configure APN, and enter what you wrote down. Hope this works :cheers:

re: Playing Through a Zelda Title

Posted by starkag on 3/4/15 at 10:05 pm
quote:

The only people I've ever seen dispute this are 13-16 year olds who have never even owned a N64.

Not anymore! 20+ years old, played and completed every game in the series (that's 17 of them), and played the N64 games when they came out. Wind Waker and Skyward Sword are actually my 2 favorites, in that order. I wouldn't call them objectively the best, but they are definitely far from the worst. Try playing the four swords games, and get back to me.

Edit: to answer OP's question, I would not recommend emulating any of those. They can all be played on a Wii U, just stick with that if you want to play one. If you already have Twilight Princess, nothing wrong with starting out there. It may not be my favorite, but I don't really think you can go wrong with any of the 3D games. And you can only go wrong with very few of the 2D games, for that matter. :cheers:

re: Started Twilight Princess

Posted by starkag on 2/27/15 at 1:19 pm
I didn't love the wolf parts, but they weren't awful. Certainly didn't add anything for me, but I didn't mind it. My main problem was that I didn't like the dungeons. There were maybe 2 that were really good, out of like 9? Yall may disagree, but they just didn't do anything for me. Still fun, just not up to the usual standards.
I've only played a handful of games, but all of them have been absolutely worth keeping the system. Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon is surprisingly fantastic. Mario 3D Land is a good time waster. Obviously the OOT and MM remakes are safe. I've also played some old DS games my brother had, and got a few titles for the Virtual Console.

If none of these sound appealing, then don't forget about Smash Bros. At first I thought the 3DS controls would be weird, but honestly, I prefer them to everything but Gamecube controller now. Bottom line, it is a great system and there is plenty of fun you'd miss out on if you dumped it off.

Edit: I also got mine to play Between Worlds, and have expanded since then.

re: How long is A Link Between Worlds?

Posted by starkag on 2/19/15 at 10:55 am
I did not play Link to the Past until I was probably 20 or so. I have no nostalgia for it at all. It was fun, but I didn't think it was as genre defining as those who played it growing up seemed to think.

Link Between Worlds, however, blew my mind. When I first finished it, I thought, "this must be how everyone else feels about LTTP". And then I started a new file and finished it again. So, yeah, I think you'll like it.
I know it isn't a popular opinion, but I just really loved SS. I definitely see the faults in it and can understand why someone may not enjoy it as much. But I just have so much fun swinging that remote around :lol:

Definitely one of my favorites, not necessarily one of "the best" if we are looking at it objectively. I still don't think it's as bad as everyone seems to think it is, though.
Skyward Sword, Wind Waker, and Link Between Worlds are 3 of my top 4 games in the series. But he isn't the only person to make a good Zelda game, and not all of his have been as great as those 3. It isn't like the series will be worthless without him, but I'll definitely be sad to see him go.
Don't care what yall say, I loved Skyward Sword. Art direction, dungeons, story, gameplay, motion controls, everything. And I have beaten every single mainline Zelda game (there are 17 of them), so don't even try to convince me otherwise :lol:

re: Favorite Super Bowl snack?

Posted by starkag on 1/27/15 at 4:32 pm
I like to barbecue something. Usually babyback ribs, food with a handle is always a good snack.