Started By
Message
locked post

SC President proposes SC-Mizzou rivalry.

Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:20 am
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25862 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:20 am
From the SC student newspaper today. SC President also talks about future SEC scheduling, kind of sort of what happened at the UK basketball game the other night, among other things.

LINK

quote:

The ‘Battle for Columbia’

With the addition of Missouri to the SEC East, Pastides placed a call to Missouri’s university president with one of his ideas.

“I proposed to him that we create a new kind of championship that can be called the Battle for Columbia,” Pastides said. “They’re in Columbia, Mo., and we’re in Columbia, S.C. He liked the idea. We’re going to talk about it with the commissioner and maybe start a new rivalry with Mizzou in that way.”

If the proposal is approved by the league, Pastides envisions a traveling trophy that both universities would pay for, with the victorious team holding the trophy each year.

“It’s what fans love to see,” Pastides said. “The rivalry with Clemson is storied — you don’t need to do anything to pump that one up. When I ask them, ‘OK, I know the Clemson game is very important; what’s your next most important rivalry?’ You’ll probably hear Georgia, but not uniformly and probably because it’s a short drive. It’d be fun to think of someday the Missouri Tigers and the Gamecocks having a ‘Battle for Columbia.’”


Perhaps instead of focusing on an Arky-Mizzou trophy idea looks like we might be headed to an SC-Mizzou trophy or sorts.
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 10:22 am
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12458 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:21 am to
Does the winner get to have the other school's Columbia for a week or something?
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15301 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:22 am to
Forced rivalries.
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:22 am to
this has got lame written all over it.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140383 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:22 am to
Why not target Bama or LSU?

Mizzou??? Really? USC taking aim at the new weak kid?

Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:23 am to
Seems forced.
Posted by DoubleDown
New Orleans, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2008
12869 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:23 am to
Sounds like a good idea. Rivalries have to start from something so why not?!

I have a feeling that Mizzou and Arky will be "#1 Rivals" though - just because of proximity.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:24 am to
they been gettin dat arse whooped by their other 2 rivalries for so long they wanna get a new one to hopefully beat on
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25862 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:24 am to
Well yeah, I think SC and Mizzou have only played twice before, both in bowls. So its not like there is some legit heat between the 2 schools that have been eagerly awaiting to meet each other again.


quote:

they been gettin dat arse whooped by their other 2 rivalries for so long they wanna get a new one to hopefully beat on


SC has been playing football for 120 years, this is probably the worst time for either fan base to be talking crap to SC.
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 10:26 am
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:26 am to
psh 2 wins suddenly nullifies an entire series

not to mention you're 4th on the rivalry totem bronamath
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 10:26 am
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:26 am to
I propose a State/Duke rivalry in bball. So the frick what. Who proposes rivalries?
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:27 am to
Not if we never play in football.

Mizzou needs their Texas ties to compete.
Posted by AUnite
The Tragic City
Member since Nov 2010
14828 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:29 am to
quote:

USC taking aim at the new weak kid?

It's not like they can pick on Vandy
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25862 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:29 am to
quote:

psh 2 wins suddenly nullifies an entire series


No, but they haven been some random arse win in between 5-6 losses vs UGA. SC has just had the better team, and unlike previous years has had the best team in the East (and the state of SC of course) That is what is different.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95903 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:29 am to
quote:

not to mention you're 4th on the rivalry totem bronamath


And we give a damn?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95903 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:30 am to
quote:

It's not like they can pick on Vandy


Why can't we?
Posted by AUnite
The Tragic City
Member since Nov 2010
14828 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:32 am to
quote:

CNB

I guess you could, but there's really no fun in that. No one picks on Vandy. Not even TN and they're in the same state


I think "Battle for Columbia" is a little gay, but I like it. I say pick on the Baby Tigers.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25862 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:34 am to
quote:

is a little gay


quote:

but I like it


Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95903 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:35 am to
I think Battle OF Columbia would be a bit better.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:37 am to
wanna han out a trophy go ahead... yall have to play every year anyway.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter