Started By
Message
re: Saban quote on Landon Collins
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:36 am to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:36 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
If you think I'm wrong, then you think the entire BCS formula is wrong. (Which is fine, because so do I.)
So the entire BCS formula under which your program won two separate national titles and is the same formula that placed you in the 2012 BCS Title game is wrong just because it placed Alabama in the game as well?
Does this dick envy base out of Nick Saban or Alabama or some combination?
1
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:36 am to TbirdSpur2010
STOP DEBATING THE FACTS!
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:37 am to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
Fact #1 LSU played Alabama on January 9th, 2012.
Fact #2 LSU proceeded to pucker their tight little a-hole as Alabama went in dry.
That is all that matters at this point.
You're being deliberately obtuse to muddle the point.
I will help you.
NOTHING before January 9th (or for that matter, the date of the BCS selection show, whenever that may have been) matters.
The point being debated is HOW and WHY Alabama got there.
Re-read that last sentence again.
Or shut the frick up.
Thank you.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:37 am to Nortizzle
quote:
STOP DEBATING THE FACTS!
Yes sir.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:37 am to Nortizzle
quote:
STOP DEBATING THE FACTS!
It's nighttime on the SECr. Let me have my facts, dammit!
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:38 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
The fact remains that Oklahoma State beat more ranked teams than Alabama that year. That's not even debatable
Irrelevant.
How?
How is that irrelevant?
Because you want it to be?
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:38 am to Nortizzle
quote:
Nortizzle
So, you were cool with being left out in 2004?
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:38 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
You're being deliberately obtuse to muddle the point.
What point is your FELLOW FAN "muddling"?
quote:
NOTHING before January 9th (or for that matter, the date of the BCS selection show, whenever that may have been) matters.
quote:
The point being debated is HOW and WHY Alabama got there.
Because they were the better team. A fact that they proved for every last second of :21-0:
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:39 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
shut the frick up.
Thank you.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:39 am to Libertyabides71
quote:
So the entire BCS formula under which your program won two separate national titles and is the same formula that placed you in the 2012 BCS Title game is wrong just because it placed Alabama in the game as well?
It was wrong in 2004. It was wrong in 2012.
It never gets a chance to be wrong again after this year.
Hmm...I wonder why that is?
Stop being obtuse.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:39 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
You're being deliberately obtuse to muddle the point.
I will help you.
NOTHING before January 9th (or for that matter, the date of the BCS selection show, whenever that may have been) matters.
The point being debated is HOW and WHY Alabama got there.
Re-read that last sentence again.
Or shut the frick up.
Thank you.
Every LSU fan that I have ever interacted with at a tailgate has been a passionate and interesting person to hang out with. You are no representative of LSU despite your delusion and its so sad you are even attacking your fellow LSU fans over a game nearly 600 days ago.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:39 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
So why play again? I thought the regular season was supposed to be important?
There you go again. Injecting your own ideas into a formula that doesn't give a shite about you.
quote:
And why do you think that is?
Probably because fans and some schools have been clamoring for a playoff for many years now.
By the way, in case you didn't notice, I beat you. I won. You can go now.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:39 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
How is that irrelevant?
Because you want it to be?
Because it is irrelevant.
They did all that great shite in beating ranked teams, then lost to Iowa State.
They fricked up big time. So all the other shite they did was irrelevant.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:40 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:what does it change if I wasn't cool with it? I could get angry on a message board but that doesn't accomplish anything.
So, you were cool with being left out in 2004?
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:40 am to GeauxWarTigers
Y'all really need to do a better job of keeping some of these dumbasses on the Tiger Rant.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:40 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Because they were the better team.
Then WHY did they need 2 chances to prove it?
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:40 am to Nortizzle
quote:
what does it change if I wasn't cool with it? I could get angry on a message board but that doesn't accomplish anything.
quit being a cuckold, bro.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:41 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
They did all that great shite in beating ranked teams, then lost to Iowa State.
They fricked up big time. So all the other shite they did was irrelevant.
That is ridiculous fricking logic, and I hope one day you come to see that.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:42 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Then WHY did they need 2 chances to prove it?
Because none of the other 1 loss frickups had better resumes.
And if y'all were the better team (re: conference/division champs), then it really shouldn't have been that big a deal to beat them again on your own goddamn turf
Posted on 8/23/13 at 3:42 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
A fact that they proved for every last second of :21-0:
Hey, now. There was that one time that LSU crossed the 50. You know, that one time. You know the one I'm talking about. Anyway, I'm pretty sure LSU proved to be the better team for those few seconds.
Page 14 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News