Started By
Message
re: RE: Ole Miss NCAA (NSIAP)
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:04 pm to Shepherd88
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:04 pm to Shepherd88
Is there a great of chance it will be some what different yes. And if they add Level 1st yes but I think this shows that out legal team did a damn good job at working out these self imposed penalties. I know there are a lot of self proclaimed NCAA experts but I'm going to have to say the real experts that just got it right know way more they people that are saying Ole Miss is getting 30+ off the NOA based off what they want to see.
1
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:04 pm to HottyToddy7
Why would they investgate a contract between Bo Davis and Alabama? NCAA would never investigate a contract between an institution and coach.
Bo Davis suffered the same fate Joker Phillips suffered at Florida when he contacted a recruit during a dead period too. He got fired.
Alabama would have kept Bo if he didn't lie to UA Compliance and the NCAA about contacting a recruit in a dead period. Probably would have just taken a few recruiting days away and education. The normal stuff.
Bo Davis suffered the same fate Joker Phillips suffered at Florida when he contacted a recruit during a dead period too. He got fired.
Alabama would have kept Bo if he didn't lie to UA Compliance and the NCAA about contacting a recruit in a dead period. Probably would have just taken a few recruiting days away and education. The normal stuff.
This post was edited on 10/7/16 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:05 pm to secuniversity
So Bo Davis making more in 2 months than he was contracted to make in 2016 3 months after he was fired isn't fishy? GFYS.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:09 pm to HottyToddy7
It doesn't matter what coaches get compensated.
The institution makes the contracts not the NCAA. NCAA investigates student athletes' eligibility issues not what is in a coach's contract. They can't dictate that.
The institution makes the contracts not the NCAA. NCAA investigates student athletes' eligibility issues not what is in a coach's contract. They can't dictate that.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:09 pm to HottyToddy7
Yeah, I'm the one that doesn't understand how this works. You right, OM will get a formal apology from the NCAA before this is over.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:11 pm to HottyToddy7
You guys are already fricked. Why not forfeit your game with us so the poor gators can play us that day?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:13 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Great news for Ole Miss
No. Not sure how anyone could spin that to being "great news" for Ole Miss.
This was Wolken RTing Emily James from NCAA
Basically, what this announcement means is, the WBB & T&F investigations are complete and will move forward on penalties soon.
The Football investigation is not complete. It either stays as bad as it appeared in April for Ole Miss (self imposed multiple scholly reductions, etc), or NCAA has more and it gets worse for Ole Miss.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:13 pm to LSU Patrick
This is freeze's farewell tour... no way they self impose bowl ban
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:18 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
I'm melting like some cheap underwear between Bert's thunder thighs.
30-0
4th and 25
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:20 pm to bamasgot13
Great news because they agreed with everything Ole Miss said in response. Also this split isn't something that just happened it happened awhile ago considering the case had to go to the COI before this happened.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:23 pm to TampaReb
quote:
Great news because they agreed with everything Ole Miss said in response
Then why didn't they accept Ole Miss' self proposed sanctions?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:30 pm to secuniversity
It's called hush money. Are you retarded?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:30 pm to bamasgot13
Because external pressures want a pound of flesh.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:30 pm to MedDawg
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:32 pm to bamasgot13
They did.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:32 pm to bamasgot13
They did. For WBB and Track which this ruling was on. Just showing how on it our legal team is. If things change ok but based off the NOA our legal team was right on with how it handled WBB and track.
Also read the release the split happened when the football investigation reopened after you read it not once they found new stuff.
Also read the release the split happened when the football investigation reopened after you read it not once they found new stuff.
This post was edited on 10/7/16 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:34 pm to TampaReb
Accepted self-proposed bc you took action to correct issues by firing coaches involved. Is this the same game plan toward football? Nope...
BTW, NCAA destroyed those coaches with show causes and the ucla assistant got a show cause 2 weeks ago for a level 2.
BTW, NCAA destroyed those coaches with show causes and the ucla assistant got a show cause 2 weeks ago for a level 2.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:40 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Then why didn't they accept Ole Miss' self proposed sanctions?
In fairness, from a program standpoint they pretty much did. They didn't add any scholarship or postseason bans on top of those already self imposed by Ole Miss.
What they did add was a shait-ton of show-causes including both head coaches. Were I an OM staffer named in the football report, I'd be making sure I had my real estate or insurance sales license up to date.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:46 pm to msstate7
Yes they fired the coachs off the recommendation of the legal counsel. You can make up assumption that we followed the legal council 100% for these sports but not football. Here is a shocker they have a much better understanding of the situation and you don't understand the workings of the NCAA as a top tier NCAA attorney. If they said fire a football coach to save the program he would be hitting the bricks.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 2:48 pm to TampaReb
Even if it was freeze? He was directly named in a level 1
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News