Started By
Message

re: Ranking the SEC’s most successful programs of all-time: 3-1

Posted on 6/25/15 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

A&M way too high. If we're at #7 now, we'll be big 6 in 5 years.



Georgia and Tennessee on the clock.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:00 pm to
quote:


You Johnny Come Lately's need to go back and read up on your SEC history. I knew we shouldn't have let Texans into this conference. It could only frick things up.


Most of the TAMU fans know football. This one is just the auburnphan of their group. Not fair to judge them all based on him.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
68601 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

13 possible games a season.

in fairness, college football didn't go to a 12 game regular season until the 2006 season, 14 years after divisional play began.
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9078 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:05 pm to
quote:



Georgia and Tennessee on the clock.




I actually would put us behind Arkansas, but on the fast track to rise much quicker.

I think Florida would have the most "passable" all time resume, but too much recent success to overcome in most current fans minds.

Georgia is really pushing it. They're an incredible program, they're consistently "good" and have so much potential, buttttttttttt.....
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12721 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

First, I offered an approximation, not a precise mathematical result. Second, did I say the doldrums were all in consecutive years? I count eleven years of 8 wins or less (including a 5-6 season two years prior to 2007) in the SECCG era of 13 possible games a season. That's "close to half" of 23. If you want to argue that 8 wins isn't in the doldrums for the #2 program in the SEC historically, we can discuss. But you really took it a bit too literally.


Prior to 2008 UT had been consistently good. A random bad season cannot be described as "doldrums" the only thing that would match that description is 2008 to 2014. 7 seasons or less than 1/3
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:06 pm to
quote:


in fairness, college football didn't go to a 12 game regular season until the 2006 season, 14 years after divisional play began.


With the SECCG plus a bowl, they could have 13, which is why I specified "possible". An SECCG season would definitely be a successful one for UT.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:10 pm to
quote:


Prior to 2008 UT had been consistently good. A random bad season cannot be described as "doldrums" the only thing that would match that description is 2008 to 2014. 7 seasons or less than 1/3


They were consistently good. I don't dispute that at all. But they had bad years that didn't reach the standards for the 2nd best program in the SEC. You prefer consecutive. I was speaking overall. I'm right by my definition, you're right by yours. Might as well just let the debate end on that note. Fair enough?
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

BigOrangeBri



Hey you lying sack of shite. You running from your obligations?

Posted by Cumulonimbus
Alabama
Member since Jun 2014
623 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Historically, though, UT is the king of the SEC East, easily dispatching close rivals Georgia and Florida on a big-picture scale.

I get what the writer means, but this is a poor statement. The East has only existed for a little over 2 decades, and UT is 3rd or 4th best in that time.
Posted by DannyB
Bagram, Afghanistan
Member since Aug 2010
6141 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:13 pm to
This reeks of response thread, possibly to this post of mine...

"
quote:

The only team that can talk shite is Alabama. The rest of YALL can stfu


You have 2 big brothers in the state of Alabama!!!

28-21-3

6 in a row. Combined score in those 6 games 195-116.











Think I will talk shite all I want to!!!"
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:16 pm to
Auburn emptied out Neyland the last 3 times we visited.
This post was edited on 6/25/15 at 10:18 pm
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:18 pm to
quote:


You have 2 big brothers in the state of Alabama!!!

28-21-3

6 in a row. Combined score in those 6 games 195-116.


They may be our rivals, but we have UT's back:

21-20-1

We're beating y'all up in defense of our state of Tennessee brethren's honor.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:19 pm to
Dammit man why bring that up.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
75785 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Most of the TAMU fans know football. This one is just the auburnphan of their group. Not fair to judge them all based on him.


Eh, I hope the fanbase as a whole is not represented by the shitstain Aggie posters I have seen on this board for the most part. They are fricking awful.
Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
13790 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:20 pm to
You lost me at Alabama winning 15 titles
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Tennessee only started claiming 6 around 5 or 6 years ago. Prior to the remodel of the interior of Neyland and a bunch of banners being displayed, Tennessee only claimed 1951 and 1998.






I'm not gonna get into this discussion again, (Korin, WE ARE NOT HAVING THIS DISCUSSION AGAIN, the answer is NO), but the only title we have no business claiming is 1967. That leaves us with 5, and quite frankly, I don't care if anyone agrees or not.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56243 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

You lost me at Alabama winning 15 titles



14 is probably more reasonable. 1941 is bullshite. The others, not so much.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Dammit man why bring that up.


To troll two fanbases at once, of course. I think the backhanded trolling of UT in my post was worse than the overt one of Auburn.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72910 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:23 pm to
Does saying 10 poll titles make you feel better?
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12721 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 10:26 pm to
: a state or period of sadness or depression

: a state or period in which there is no activity or improvement

I get what you're saying, but doldrums wasn't the correct term to use for it.

Doldrums indicates a span of time in which we would've been down.

2008-2014 is the only period that matches the definition.
This post was edited on 6/25/15 at 10:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter