Started By
Message
re: Ranking the 11 greatest college football programs of all time
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:05 am to tomsellecksmustache
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:05 am to tomsellecksmustache
my point it is silly to talk about best programs of all time if most of the list are programs that have been struggling the last 10 years or so.
i also think the heisman criteria is dumb too. Watson deserved Heisman last two years but didn't get it.
i also think the heisman criteria is dumb too. Watson deserved Heisman last two years but didn't get it.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 10:07 am
3
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:06 am to Huddie Leadbetter
Why rank 11 teams beside the obvious reason to make sure Florida is on the list, although they should maybe make a Top 20 team list
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:11 am to Tillman
quote:
my point it is silly to talk about best programs of all time if most of the list are programs that have been struggling the last 10 years or so.
i also think the heisman criteria is dumb too. Watson deserved Heisman last two years but didn't get it.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:21 am to tomsellecksmustache
Penn State and Tennesse>>>>>>>Florida
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:21 am to Tillman
Florida at 11?? Lol
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:24 am to 14&Counting
quote:
quote: 1 real Heisman and one meh, Could say the exact same thing about Auburn
Might be the dumbest statement ever said on this site.
Bo freaking Jackson
Cam freaking Newton
Generational players without a doubt.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:24 am to ChexMix
Show us Pat Sullivan's Heisman stats. 
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:25 am to Tillman
quote:
my point it is silly to talk about best programs of all time if most of the list are programs that have been struggling the last 10 years or so.
You do understand what "All Time" means, right? It doesn't mean last 10 years. It means, like, forever.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:26 am to Huddie Leadbetter
Slideshow link = downvote
Hate that crap.
Hate that crap.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:28 am to DawgsLife
quote:
do understand what "All Time" means, right? It doesn't mean last 10 years. It means, like, forever.
it is crazy that programs considered best all t ime are struggling so much in recent years thouhgh.
my point is sports is about right now. once there became more competitive programs in sports, all these 'best of all time' programs started to struggle.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 10:30 am
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:32 am to Tillman
Struggle? Speak for yourself.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:38 am to nc14
you think Clemson has been struggling in recent years? lol
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:39 am to Huddie Leadbetter
The blue bloods are the top 8. They got that right
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:42 am to Tillman
By comparison, and solely based on YOUR post - yes. Even though that's not where I was initially going.
Since you introduced it, breakdown those last ten years that would make you "all-time" worthy.
Since you introduced it, breakdown those last ten years that would make you "all-time" worthy.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:45 am to nc14
quote:
By comparison, and solely based on YOUR post - yes. Even though that's not where I was initially going.
Since you introduced it, breakdown those last ten years that would make you "all-time" worthy.
my point, which you seem dedicated to missing, is these programs are bluebloods, why have many of them been struggling? USC, texas, michigan, tenn, nebraska, miami, etc have struggled in recent years despite high dollar coaches.
what is the point of calling your program a blueblood if it still struggles at times and a program not considered blueblood is winning a natty.
the truth is what happened in the past does not predict the present and future success of a program.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 10:48 am
Posted on 1/22/17 at 10:50 am to Tillman
Except "all these" does not equate to many. USC has won a title, OSU won one and made playoffs this year, ND played for a title. Who are these many you speak of?
Posted on 1/22/17 at 11:08 am to Warfarer
quote:
And it looks like Notre Dame, Michigan, Ohio State and USC did some Alabama math in the last few years
Auburn Just Gave Itself Three More National Championships
As of today, Auburn athletics' official website now claims three additional national titles, to go along with the two they actually won.
"The NCAA recognizes Auburn as National Champions in 2010, 1993, 1983, 1957 and 1913.
This is especially funny because the NCAA itself doesn't crown, select, or recognize national champions from Division IA/FBS."
LINK
Posted on 1/22/17 at 11:09 am to nc14
USC won that title in 2005. it is now 2017. what have they done since. it is difficult to believe you are awake.
ND isn't in the title conversation most seasons and the year they made it to the title game, they got crushed on both sides of the ball.
ND isn't in the title conversation most seasons and the year they made it to the title game, they got crushed on both sides of the ball.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 11:11 am
Posted on 1/22/17 at 11:12 am to Gary Busey
quote:
It says we have 3 Heisman winners, when we only have 2.
The Jets knew better. They signed both Joe Namath and John Hurate. They gave Namath a $400K signing bonus and gave Hurate $200k. Did Hurate ever even play!?
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 1/22/17 at 11:14 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
Might be the dumbest statement ever said on this site.
Might have been referring to Pat Sullivan but I am pretty sure you have no idea who that is.
Page 2 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News