Started By
Message

Question to the OM fan base (not a troll attempt)
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:29 pm
After seeing a thread on the sec rant yesterday I was just curious and just wanted to hear the honest opinion of the OM fan base. Do you guys really think Bo is better than Mett was? Just curious, good luck against Tennessee. (Not that you need it)
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:31 pm to TigersGeaux001
Mett probably had more tools than Bo does. I wouldn't trade anyone for Bo at this point. A 3 year starter who knows the system is a big part of our success. Not to mention that he has the ability to get hot on 3rd down and take over a game. (LSU 2013 and Bama 2014).
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:32 pm to TigersGeaux001
His arm isn't as strong and Mett has a slight edge in accuracy. Both made poor decisions. I'll take Bo's entangles anyway though.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:34 pm to HottyToddy7
I'm sorry but Bo Wallace did not take over that game last year the final was simply the result of LSU 's first half turnovers.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:34 pm to BallstotheWesleyWall
quote:
I'll take Bo's entangles anyway though.
tha fuq?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:35 pm to TigersGeaux001
Bo is a much better dual threat QB while Mett is far and away the better pure pocket passer.
That's why Mett will start for an NFL team someday and Bo probably won't.
That being said, Bo has accomplished and will accomplish much greater feats and soar to much greater heights than Zack ever dreamed of during his time in Baton Rouge... Bo was damn close to having a 2-0 H2H record against Mettenbooger as well.
That's why Mett will start for an NFL team someday and Bo probably won't.
That being said, Bo has accomplished and will accomplish much greater feats and soar to much greater heights than Zack ever dreamed of during his time in Baton Rouge... Bo was damn close to having a 2-0 H2H record against Mettenbooger as well.
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:36 pm to dawgM2
quote:
quote:
I'll take Bo's entangles anyway though.
tha fuq?
You seen his hair brah?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:36 pm to dawgM2

Come on DawgM2.. Your age is showing.
Intangibles = Entangles
Cause of Bo's hair
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:37 pm to reggierayreb
At the end of both of there careers:
Mett: 1 sec championship
Bo:(will have) 0
Mett: 1 sec championship
Bo:(will have) 0
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:37 pm to TigersGeaux001
That's why you play 4 quarters.. Did you not realized there was another half to play
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:37 pm to TigersGeaux001
quote:
Do you guys really think Bo is better than Mett was?
Yes. Bo performs better late in games than Mett did it appears.
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:40 pm to TigersGeaux001
I'm not sure if he is or not, but at this moment I wouldn't change a thing. His decision making has been pretty good the past few games, and if it continues the sky is the limit.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:40 pm to TigersGeaux001
quote:
At the end of both of there careers:
Mett: 1 sec championship
Bo:(will have) 0
I disagree
And your anger is showing
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:43 pm to TigersGeaux001
I was going to say Mett until I looked up their stats. Plus Mett had a better oline and wr's too.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:43 pm to reggierayreb
quote:
Bo was damn close to having a 2-0 H2H record against Mettenbooger as well.
Couldn't you also say that Bo was very close to having an 0-2 record against him?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:45 pm to Henry Jones Jr
My only knock on Bo is that you can time his release with a calendar. He has a wind up that rivals Byron Leftwich.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:47 pm to Cdawg
quote:
My only knock on Bo is that you can time his release with a calendar. He has a wind up that rivals Byron Leftwich.
Same. When Buchanan came in against Vanderbilt and threw the ball, his release looked like Dan Marino's compared to Bo's.

Popular
Back to top
