Started By
Message
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:53 pm to Teague
quote:lolwut?
Your Heisman candidate DB is a liability in coverage.

Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:55 pm to drexyl
quote:
drexyl
Read a little further, man. It was just a flame.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:00 pm to UsingUpAllTheLetters
quote:
Just an opinion
An opinion that is wrong (Turbo fact not opinion).
I was going to enjoy some popcorn while someone else shot down the position that Bama has an advantage at RB.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:04 pm to MTurbo
Auburn fans can testify, right?
But yeah, the dude did get a lot of flack I think.
As did someone that said Bama was better off at QB and the same thing for someone saying Bama's DL was better.

But yeah, the dude did get a lot of flack I think.
As did someone that said Bama was better off at QB and the same thing for someone saying Bama's DL was better.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:12 pm to UsingUpAllTheLetters
quote::facepalm:
I just wanted to voice that I thought Claiborne and Reid were better cover corners
Posted on 12/21/11 at 2:14 pm to CrimsonChin
quote:
QB: Advantage Alabama - Although Jefferson may be very important in LSU's option attack, McCarron is a better true quarterback in every sense of the word.
OL: Push - I agree here. It's a push, although I think Alabama's O-line gets a lot more talk due to Jones and Vlachos.
RB: Slight advantage to Bama due to Trent - I am willing to concede the running back advantage to Alabama, simply because Richardson is that good. However, I think LSU will out rush Alabama in the championship game.
WR: Nice advantage for LSU - Agree, although Alabama's receivers are definitely underrated.
TE: Advantage Bama - Agree. DeAngelo Peterson is overrated for LSU, mainly because we don't really use him in the passing game enough.
DL: LSU - LSU first four are better, in my opinion, and we are deeper. It was clear in the first game whose defensive line was fresher late in the 4th quarter and overtime.
LB: Nice advantage for Bama - Agree. No doubt.
DB: LSU - Disagree here. LSU has the better secondary. Claiborne is the best defensive back college football has seen in a while, and Brandon Taylor is a top two safety in the SEC. He flies under so many radars it's ridiculous. At the end of the day, LSU's secondary has more playmakers and is a little deeper.
ST: Nice advantage for LSU - Agree
Coaching: Push. Both coaches have done an outstanding job this year. - I agree.
The bolded ones are what I have changed. I have also commented on all of yours.

Posted on 12/22/11 at 8:26 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
A lot of LSU fans are insulted when Bama fans think they have a chance. That's my issue. Bama CAN and MIGHT win this game, as crazy as that sounds
Thats not accurate. LSU fans are insulted by all these Bama fans who don't give LSU any credit for the first game. All I have heard is how your team lost it by missed oppertunities and that since Bama won the yardage game it so clearly means Bama was the better team. Stop it. LSU was the reason Bama had to attempt rediculously long FG's that a smart coach would have punted away. Even the Bear is quoted as saying - stats are for losers. Considering LSU won and Bama lost, clearly he was right. Its ashame that Bama fans actually argue this point knowing that the greatest representative in Bama history would be ashamed of all of them for even thinking of using that arguement.
LSU won. Bama lost because LSU outplayed them in the 4th and in OT. Thats fact.
Posted on 12/22/11 at 8:30 am to CrimsonChin
I think that is a fair assessment.
Posted on 12/22/11 at 8:40 am to DennyChimes10
quote:
He went into a shell and tried to sit on the lead. He made a huge mistake doing that. Once again, I'm not saying Saban is perfect because he is not. What I'm saying is Les has not became the Lonbardi of college football the past year either.
Yet he's 5-2 against Bama and 3-2 against Saban, who 99% of Bama fans think is only 2nd to Bear Bryant in the best coach in the history of football.
Popular
Back to top
