Started By
Message
locked post

Oregon ejection

Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:01 pm
Posted by Jimmy Bags
Member since Apr 2025
578 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:01 pm
Baserunner gets ejected for excessive contact at the plate, but the catcher was blocking the plate. Total BS..
Posted by PrairievilleTiger
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2016
1206 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:02 pm to
Didn’t know you were an Oregon fan. Screw the ducks!
Posted by lsutyger23
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
1098 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:05 pm to
Absolutely terrible!!! Screw Oregon but almost pulling for them now
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77690 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:06 pm to
Im wondering how they called that, especially since Oregon is home.
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
14361 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:08 pm to
Oregon blocked the plate to end the top of the 8th. Reviewed and no obstruction.
Posted by TimeOutdoors
LA
Member since Sep 2014
13079 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:08 pm to
Link to replay?
Posted by Jimmy Bags
Member since Apr 2025
578 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:10 pm to
I’m more a fan of the truth loser
Posted by Eternalmajin
Member since Jun 2008
13656 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:18 pm to
Runner made no attempt at all to slide or avoid the catcher. Haven't been able to do that in what feels like a decade.
Posted by NFLSU
Screwston, Texas
Member since Oct 2014
18821 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:21 pm to
Catcher had his legs spread, completely blocking the plate without the ball.

I’m not an Oregon fan but that was a horseshite call.

Glad they lost though.
Posted by Volsfan82169
Spring Hill, TN
Member since Aug 2016
3693 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:23 pm to
While it was obstruction, malicious contact supersedes that.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3611 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Runner made no attempt at all to slide

Yes he did. It was a fricked up attempt because the catcher was standing a foot in front of home

quote:

or avoid the catcher
catcher was completely blocking the base path. There was no avoiding him without leaving the path or coming to a complete stop.
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
12645 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:31 pm to
I’m pulling for Utah Vaey, but that’s BS
Posted by Volsfan82169
Spring Hill, TN
Member since Aug 2016
3693 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

catcher was completely blocking the base path. There was no avoiding him without leaving the path or coming to a complete stop.


And if he leaves the path or stops due to the presence of a defender without possession, OBS would be called. But they ruled malicious contact, which supersedes an OBS call.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

While it was obstruction, malicious contact supersedes that.


Just bring back running over the catcher. No one understands the blocking the plate rule anyways.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3611 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

And if he leaves the path or stops due to the presence of a defender without possession, OBS would be called. But they ruled malicious contact, which supersedes an OBS call.

It wasn’t malicious contact. He started a slide and was blocked by the catcher.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
39473 posts
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:58 pm to
since no one, including the OP, wants to link the video...


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
17478 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 12:10 am to
The home plate ump called the runner safe before touched home plate.

So it is almost like he ruled that the catcher was blocking the plate before the review.
Posted by GreyReb
Member since Jun 2010
4476 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 12:10 am to
I can’t believe the 10 minute review resulted in what it did. Oregon got straight hosed
Posted by Jimmy Bags
Member since Apr 2025
578 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 12:10 am to
Frick off they didn’t have it available yet
Posted by Jimmy Bags
Member since Apr 2025
578 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 12:11 am to
One play has nothing to do with the other
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter