Started By
Message

re: Ole Miss Sanctions - Based on What We Know

Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:12 am to
Posted by We_R_The_Tide
Athens, Alabama
Member since Dec 2013
916 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:12 am to
NCAA: "Mr Miller, I understand you say an Ole Miss Asst. AD paid your utility bills, but we asked him, and he said he never gave y'all money......and there just anything to back your story"

Miller: "I'm telling you it, and everything else I told you happened"

Fast forward to the day after the draft..............

NCAA: "We are sorry Mr. Miller, but I we have some new information that tells us you were telling the truth, and that maybe OM wasn't being honest with us"

Miller: "No problem, what else you want to know about"

NCAA: "Oh, don't worry.....we still have everything you told us and gave us, and will be reinvestigating it much harder for the next letter we are about to hit them up with."

Miller: "Glad I could help"
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
17586 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:20 am to
Thanks
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Ole Miss Sanctions - Based on What We Know


Prediction:
16 scholarship reduction in FB over 3 years (6 in year one, 5 each of next 2 years)
5 years probation
2 year bowl ban
3 year show cause for certain to be named members of OM staff (football ops, Ath Dept, coaching)
Posted by WithaRebelYell
Bristol TN
Member since Jan 2013
4859 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:54 am to
I think they will accept the sanctions OM self imposed and we will all move on. The NCAA has been there for 3 years. Are you telling me that they haven't already discussed an appropriate punishment?
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 9:55 am
Posted by WithaRebelYell
Bristol TN
Member since Jan 2013
4859 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 9:57 am to
You can't seriously think that can you? Penn State let kids get raped and didn't get it that bad.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69945 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I think they will accept the sanctions OM self imposed and we will all move on.




Posted by DingDongEddieStrong
Member since Aug 2013
3779 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Prediction: 16 scholarship reduction in FB over 3 years (6 in year one, 5 each of next 2 years) 5 years probation 2 year bowl ban 3 year show cause for certain to be named members of OM staff (football ops, Ath Dept, coaching)


That's not a prediction, that's a pipe dream.
Posted by tomsellecksmustache
Dallas, Texas
Member since Dec 2015
1786 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Prediction:
16 scholarship reduction in FB over 3 years (6 in year one, 5 each of next 2 years)
5 years probation
2 year bowl ban
3 year show cause for certain to be named members of OM staff (football ops, Ath Dept, coaching)


Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25674 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

2 year bowl ban

LINK
quote:

Ole Miss opens its football season with games against Florida State, Wofford and Alabama. If the Rebels lose two of those three, I think it’s reasonable to consider that they’d self-impose a postseason ban in the same manner than Syracuse and Louisville’s basketball programs have done in recent years. That would serve as both a preemptive strike toward a more significant NCAA penalty and potentially help the program move forward.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 10:16 am
Posted by We_R_The_Tide
Athens, Alabama
Member since Dec 2013
916 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:13 am to
At every turn since before Tunsil got suspended, you guys have made predictions.......and been wrong. Yet you want to call someone else out over their prediction. Just give it time, all will be revealed.
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

You can't seriously think that can you?

Why not? Your own school proposed 11 scholarship reductions. I doubt very seriously that the NCAA says, "yep, that's enough". They almost always add to what the school recommends when major violations are involved (see Bama in 2001, USC in 2009, etc).

You are going to get multi year probation. That's a given.
You might get a post season ban. That's been a staple of NCAA punishment in recent years. Might not be the two years I predicted, but I would be more surprised if you DIDN'T get post season ban than if you DID.

quote:

Penn State let kids get raped and didn't get it that bad.

You aren't remembering correctly. PSU got a 4 year post season ban, 20 scholarship reduction, a $60M fine, and had to vacate wins all the way back to 1998.

(post season ban was later shortened to 2 years and some scholarships given back, but the probation, the fine, and the vacating of wins never reduced).
Posted by We_R_The_Tide
Athens, Alabama
Member since Dec 2013
916 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:16 am to
Guess the Ole Miss folks made another "mistake" when they forgot to tell the NCAA about paying utility bills and rent. I'm sure they meant to, just probably so much going on, they forget to mention it.
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4469 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:17 am to
.
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 7:36 pm
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:20 am to
quote:

That's not a prediction, that's a pipe dream.

I don't care if they accept what your own school proposes as a punishment or if they hammer you worse. It won't have an impact on my life either way, so it's not a "pipe dream".

It's a prediction using available data and historical precedent. I simply stated that I felt the NCAA would add 5 scholarships to what your school recommends, add a post season ban (see USC, PSU as recent examples), and would have a longer probation period than what your school recommends.

Your own school has admitted to most of this stuff, so you know punishment is coming. I'm just predicting it will be worse than you think...and that's taking into account the whole "new information has come to light that we are investigating" from the draft night stuff. I'm stepping out on limb and saying that will result in more finding of wrong doing and that's why penalties will be harsher than your school has recommended.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2301 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

The NCAA Stated we have provided exemplary cooperation...


No, the NCAA has not said that. The words "exemplary" and "cooperation" do not appear in the NOA at all as a mitigating factor. However, several of the allegations point out the failure to cooperate as an aggravating factor.

UMiss's response to the NOA uses the term "exemplary cooperation" over a dozen times. That's not quite the same thing as the NCAA saying it, though.
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:30 am to
quote:

UMiss's response to the NOA uses the term "exemplary cooperation" over a dozen times


"these are not the droids you seek"


I wonder if OM is going to get some type of LOIC or Failure to Monitor. Admittedly, I can't recall if that has to be claimed in the NOA or not.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:42 am to
Contrary to popular belief, our lawyers weren't just sitting around writing our response and thinking to themselves, "you know what, we deserve way worse, but let's just throw some half-arse penalties at them and cross our fingers they'll accept"

The proposed penalties were based on precedents and guidance from the NCAA. I imagine there will be some more added on, but not excessively more. Just my guess
Posted by drewb808
The top notch
Member since Feb 2007
4893 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

The proposed penalties were based on precedents and guidance from the NCAA. I imagine there will be some more added on, but not excessively more. Just my guess


Based on the allegations we are aware of, this is false
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I imagine there will be some more added on, but not excessively more. Just my guess


agree more will be added on. What do you deem "excessively more"? I would say adding 5 scholarships over 3 years and a 2 year post season ban would not be "excessively more". Heck, PSU got a 4 year bowl ban, 20 scholarships, and $60M in fines that all really had more to do with legal issues rather than NCAA rules violations (though I felt PSU deserved every bit of it for what they allowed to happen to innocent children).
Posted by partsman103
Member since Sep 2008
8113 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:57 am to
8.
Cited with "Lack of Institutional Control" and "Failure to Monitor".

15 Scholarships, 5 years probation, 1 year bowl ban and coaches anointed with "show cause".

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter