Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss Sanctions - Based on What We Know
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:59 am to bamasgot13
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:59 am to bamasgot13
I still don't feel a postseason ban is going to happen.
We essentially low-balled on our proposal, but that's still based on what the NCAA is saying is acceptable.
The worst of the penalties occurred 6+ yrs ago under a different staff. Bowl ban hurts current players and staff, not Nutt and company under which it occurred. The Tunsil stuff all revolves around a single player. One player. Not likely to be enough to warrant severe penalties for the entire program
I think there will be more added schollies lost, and maybe a coach or two gone, but I doubt a bowl ban. Again, just a guess
We essentially low-balled on our proposal, but that's still based on what the NCAA is saying is acceptable.
The worst of the penalties occurred 6+ yrs ago under a different staff. Bowl ban hurts current players and staff, not Nutt and company under which it occurred. The Tunsil stuff all revolves around a single player. One player. Not likely to be enough to warrant severe penalties for the entire program
I think there will be more added schollies lost, and maybe a coach or two gone, but I doubt a bowl ban. Again, just a guess
3
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:02 am to GrantGreen
What are you some expert in punishment that can result in bowl bans? How do you know there isn't enough evidence to get a bowl bans.....oh wait you don't.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:24 am to fillmoregandt
quote:
One player. Not likely to be enough to warrant severe penalties for the entire program
Two words: Reggie. Bush
Posted on 6/30/16 at 12:08 pm to fillmoregandt
quote:
The worst of the penalties occurred 6+ yrs ago under a different staff
You have level 1 violations under the current staff
Posted on 6/30/16 at 12:30 pm to bamasgot13
No they were lifted the scholarships were given back and the wins were restored sorry but you are remembering it wrong. Below is a link to USA TOday that confirms this.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:01 pm to miss dixie
quote:
He is a pathetic con artist.
Reb, you sure you didn't get him confused with Ross "The Boss" Bjork
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:04 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
(though I felt PSU deserved every bit of it for what they allowed to happen to innocent children).
Yes and they still didn't get what you are suggesting we deserve.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:25 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
I wonder if OM is going to get some type of LOIC or Failure to Monitor. Admittedly, I can't recall if that has to be claimed in the NOA or not.
"Failure to monitor" is used throughout the allegations regarding Tunsil, and UMiss sort of admitted its failure by changing its monitoring system. The NOA calls the football allegations "a pattern of noncompliance" but does not use the words "Lack of Institutional Control"
When you have three sports committing Level 1 violations, including academic fraud, I dont' see how you avoid a charge of LOIC, but I'm not an expert. I just read the documents.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:40 pm to fillmoregandt
quote:
I still don't feel a postseason ban is going to happen.
Not only has OM cheating been exposed, the staff was shown to be involved on national TV.
I don't believe any of the incoming OM freshmen will ever get to play in a bowl, and I expect the cash payments have been cut off.
The NCAA is gonna give the OM President the option of firing Bjork and Freeze or getting the death penalty.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:47 pm to WithaRebelYell
quote:
the scholarships were given back
The scholarship ban was reduced, but they weren't retroactively given BACK the scholarships they'd already lost over 2 years prior. And the post season ban they had was reduced, but they didn't go back in time for the years prior.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:49 pm to Quicksilver
4.25
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:08 pm to bamasgot13
Did you just refuse to read the article I posted? Yes they had two years of scholarship reduction then had to recruit just like the rest of us. They weren't allowed to recruit more than 25 per year. I don't know what you mean when you say "they didn't go back in time?"
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News