Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:21 pm to MOT
I'm correcting where I was wrong. Lsu still has played opponents with lower winning percentages and played less teams with winning records to this point and what will be less teams with winning records by the end of the year as well.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:22 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
2011 Alabama > 2009 Alabama
julio jones, marcel dareus, mark ingram, rolando mcclain and terrence cody disagree.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:22 pm to Lazy But Talented
Wow op has too much time on his hands to post inaccurate facts, and is insecure.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:23 pm to ALcapone
we are the best ever
eat shite gumps
eat shite gumps
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:23 pm to Alahunter
FWIW, LSU has not had the opportunity to beat #1 this year.
(well, unless u include the spring game)
(well, unless u include the spring game)
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:29 pm
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:23 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
2011 Alabama > 2009 Alabama
Ah, so in this debate 2011 Bama is one of the best teams of the last decade, but in the are they better than OSU debate they have only beaten 3 ranked teams, don't deserve to be in the BCSCG, ect. ect.
Got it.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
I'm correcting where I was wrong. Lsu still has played opponents with lower winning percentages and played less teams with winning records to this point and what will be less teams with winning records by the end of the year as well.
but we have dominated everyone we played except...there is no 12-10 win over an unranked team at home on our schedule or 26-21 over an unranked team on the road
plus if we do beat you twice, we have to count both of your losses in our loss column even though it was us that caused those losses making yall look like a "worse" team
also LSU never had to chance to play the #1 team in the country because we have held the spot pretty much all year
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:24 pm to ALcapone
quote:
julio jones, marcel dareus, mark ingram, rolando mcclain and terrence cody disagree.
yeah 2009 bama at least won big games. 2011 Bama hasn't won one big game (just like 2010 bama) and they will finish with 2 losses.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Lsu has played 5 teams currently ranked. With a good shot of one dropping out in the final poll.
11-1 Bama #2 currently
11-2 Oregon # 5 currently
10-2 Arky #6 currently
10-3 Georgia #16 currently
7-5 Auburn #25 currently
9-3 West Virginia #23 currently
Thats 6. Also it is truly 7 because you must count bama twice.
quote:
7-6 South Carolina #22 when played
I like how you try to church that one up but dont include our games against florida and MSU who were ranked when we played them.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
As it is.. best case scenario, Lsu will have played 9 teams with winning records. That's less than what Bama had to face
Does anyone really need to point out the difference here? Intellectual dishonesty at it finest. Well done sir, well done.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm to Eighteen
I dont think anyone really thinks this team is as good as 2001 miami, but this team manhandles every team it plays and doesnt have to block field goals to beat the 7-6 peach bowl runnerups
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
FWIW, LSU has not had the opportunity to beat #1 this year.
False. LSU will have to beat #1 Bama twice. They are clearly the best team, results and polls be damned.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm to WSB33
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm to Rex Manning
all hunter needed to say was '95 nebraska.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:25 pm to northalabamacracker
quote:
Ah, so in this debate 2011 Bama is one of the best teams of the last debate, but in the are they better than OSU debate they have only beaten 3 ranked teams, don't deserve to be in the BCSCG, ect. ect.
Got it.
It's never been about who the best teams were at the end of the season. It's about which two teams had the best body of work and the best resume. Always. Most of the time, the two teams with the best body of work just happen to be the best two teams as well. That's how it goes.
Until this year, apparently.
This post was edited on 12/6/11 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:26 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Alahunter
your stats are just biased, cherry-picked, and wrong
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:26 pm to Alahunter
Regardless, it's already been reported as fact by ESPN: if LSU wins jan 9, they are the greatest college football team ever.
Ya win some, ya lose some with espn.
Ya win some, ya lose some with espn.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:26 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
FWIW, LSU has not had the opportunity to beat #1 this year.
Well, if they are honest with themselves, we play the #1 team, twice, but they like to cherry-pick the stats, like 13.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 11:27 pm to WSB33
Would 2011 LSU let 2001 8-4 Boston College drive to 9 yards away from a game winning TD at the end of the game?
Page 4 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News