Started By
Message
re: No Schollies lost, 6 games "vacated", 3 more years prbation
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:34 pm to rangers911
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:34 pm to rangers911
The punishment fit the crime in this case. If the other athletic departments didn't get the hammer dropped.. now that would be weird.
Is it official yet?
Is it official yet?
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:52 pm to bmy
I don't think anything will be official until sometime tomorrow. Right now I'm guessing it's all just speculation....but i could be wrong 
Posted on 6/10/09 at 7:55 pm to bamaboy87
So who would get the win if they had played FSU when both teams would have to forfeit
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:01 pm to chargert
fwiw everyone cheats but not everyone gets caught.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:02 pm to Lieutenant Dan
so after all the hoopla a slap on the wrist.(not even sure I would call it that) yet we have to vacate a win in which the players were suspended, and get to keep a win in which they played
I'm done trying to figure out the ncaa
This post was edited on 6/10/09 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:09 pm to Alabama Slim
Man we got the hammer layed to us....
sorry barners,we are here to stay.....
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:10 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
I don't think anything will be official until sometime tomorrow. Right now I'm guessing it's all just speculation....but i could be wrong
It was an official article on BOL. They have been pretty rigid about posting rumors about this and felt their source in the Athletic Department was good enough to finally post the article.
IMO this is not Internet mumbojumbo and comes from a solid source inside the University. I seriously doubt they would have published the article untill they felt positive they knew the facts.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:29 pm to TT9
quote:
Man we got the hammer layed to us.... sorry barners,we are here to stay.....
Anyone who believed Bama would get "serious" sanctions fro mthis has lost their mind.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:30 pm to rangers911
quote:
Anyone who believed Bama would get "serious" sanctions fro mthis has lost their mind.
:luke...cctiger:
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:32 pm to Alahunter
quote:
:luke...cctiger:
Luke is retarded.
CCTiger isn't stupid, but he just has an extreme case of hate for Alabama; and who can fault him for that
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:33 pm to Ross
quote::raiseshand:
who can fault him for that
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:38 pm to Ross
quote:
Luke is retarded.
Quit smearing the good name of actual retards like Kige. Luke is beyond retarded.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:42 pm to Ross
quote:
CCTiger isn't stupid
You're treading close to it with that statement..
Posted on 6/10/09 at 8:46 pm to Ross
quote:
CCTiger isn't stupid
When'd they change that?
Posted on 6/10/09 at 9:19 pm to superman
Ian Rappaport is reporting that Alabama will not have to vacate Tennessee win in 2007. However, any games in which the suspended players played in from 2005-2007 will be vacated. Looks like as many as ten. No scholarship losses, as previously stated, and three years probation.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 9:23 pm to CapstoneGrad06
The additional three years probation bothers me. From a 'lack of institutional control' standpoint, was it really that big of a deal? It shouldn't have happened, but still...
Posted on 6/10/09 at 9:41 pm to bamascott2
quote:
The 3 years probation is a point of concern, Bama has had issues in the past 20 years keeping its rabid fans from helping the program out. If they can keep them inline then it isn't much to worry about.
I realize Au hates all things Bama but it isnt the fans creating the problems it is the boosters
Posted on 6/10/09 at 10:39 pm to labamafan
It wasn't the fans or boosters this time. It was students who found a loophole in the system that has since been fixed.
Posted on 6/10/09 at 10:55 pm to Ross
quote:
CCTiger isn't stupid
Guy is nuts. He used to post on Auburn's rivals site. I read one post of his on this site, and automatically knew who he was just by the way he posted. He was that bad.
Back to top


1






