Started By
Message
re: New Bham News article comparing Bama NC's to Notre Dame
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:26 am to RollTide1214
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:26 am to RollTide1214
quote:
Auburn busting Alabamas balls is like a 6th grade basketball player saying he is better then lebron James... See how dumb your making your school look?
lulz
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:26 am to RollTide1214
quote:Speaking of being dumb... I think you mean "you're", brah.
Posted by RollTide1214 Auburn busting Alabamas balls is like a 6th grade basketball player saying he is better then lebron James... See how dumb your making your school look?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:27 am to TTsTowel
We have another national championship to prepare for. Bama fans just let the trolls jerk each other off on here. Lets get #15
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:28 am to TTsTowel
Yeah this is some quality stuff. I think we got another Harvey in training.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:29 am to antibarner
Hay anti, how's it hanging?
I haven't been to the old board since Leo passed, it had long turned into a circle jerk. Still keep up with Geek, AUMillz, and Newman elswhere.
I haven't been to the old board since Leo passed, it had long turned into a circle jerk. Still keep up with Geek, AUMillz, and Newman elswhere.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:30 am to RollTide1214
Yeah go out there and get #15. I am sure they will call your number when it matters most.
Come on Auburn fans, lets hit spring training hard and get ready to bounce back next year. I have nothing to do with the performance of the football team, but its fun to pretend like I do the way bammers do.
Come on Auburn fans, lets hit spring training hard and get ready to bounce back next year. I have nothing to do with the performance of the football team, but its fun to pretend like I do the way bammers do.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:31 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Usually rivals are close to equal in terms of significance or prestige. Auburn is neither. High time we drop you and make room for LSU, a team with a pulse
You mean the team Bama has a better winning percentage against than Auburn...I understand you wanting to consider a weaker opponent your rival.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:34 am to Grizzly
I consider lsu, I consider you out little sister.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:35 am to Alahunter
quote:Tell me more about your made up Dickinson trophy that you got from an Alabama blog which doesn't cite its source.
Perhaps knowing the actual truth would be a good place to start, before criticizing.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:36 am to FearlessFreep
That was a shame about Leo and I think it just about killed it off. You still get a few posts there.
Tell Geek Millz and Newman hello for me,and if Geek was Earl change that to KMA LMAO
Tell Geek Millz and Newman hello for me,and if Geek was Earl change that to KMA LMAO
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:36 am to We_Need_Cam
quote:
Come on Auburn fans, lets hit spring training hard and get ready to bounce back next year. I have nothing to do with the performance of the football team, but its fun to pretend like I do the way bammers do.
Lulz....so bitter...so angry.....
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:37 am to RollTide1214
quote:
I consider lsu, I consider you out little sister.
You must be 15? Don't answer, I know I'm right.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:39 am to WDE24
quote:
Tell me more about your made up Dickinson trophy that you got from an Alabama blog which doesn't cite its source.
Except it's not a made up trophy...
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:40 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
How do you explain this?
Dickinson System National Champions
1934 Minnesota
alabama had won the rose bowl.
Rissman broke from the Dickinson system with his trophy and decided that the winner of the Rose Bowl was the national champ.
Google Doc newspaper of Tuscaloosa news from 1935
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:41 am to FlukerFlakes
Yeah but I bet that article's a fake!!! 
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:43 am to USMC Gators
quote:Here is the thing. Alabama claims Rissman is a defacto National Championship trophy because it was handed out based on the Dickinson rankings which recognized National Champions at the time. However, Rissman, if it awarded Bama a trophy, didn't award the 1934 trophy based on Dickinson, so the argument is flawed and misleading.
Except it's not a made up trophy...
ETA: All it was was a Rose Bowl trophy. And the Rose Bowl wanted its winner to be named a national champion. It is not recognized as the National Championship trophy though.
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 11:47 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:45 am to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Rissman broke from the Dickinson system with his trophy and decided that the winner of the Rose Bowl was the national champ
In addition to several other NC selectors. Not exactly the first year there was a split NC.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:45 am to tom1987
It's kind of like records. You let a WR, RB or QB break the record because they play in so many more games than the player back in the 60's. How can that be fair unless you just ignore facts.
Let ND count theirs and let Bama count their NC.
Let ND count theirs and let Bama count their NC.
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 11:47 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 11:46 am to WDE24
quote:
Here is the thing. Alabama claims Rissman is a defacto National Championship trophy because it was handed out based on the Dickinson rankings which recognized National Champions at the time. However, Rissman, if it awarded Bama a trophy, didn't award the 1934 trophy based on Dickinson, so the argument is flawed and misleading.
Bama claims them based on Houlgate. What has been shown, is that selectors awarded the NC to Bama at the years they now claim. Something that you and several others claim we did retroactively and that wasn't done. If any argument has been busted, it's those that claimed there were no NC selectors or awards during the yrs Bama claims.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top


0







