Started By
Message
re: New article with new details
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:42 pm to nicholastiger
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:42 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
they could’ve left the scene altogether
They literally did
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:43 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Actual publications have: Style guides Requirements on sourcing Editorial oversight This guy runs the local shopper version of patch. Whatever he writes, runs verbatim.
The 1960’s called…. They want you back! LOL
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:48 pm to Captain Insano
So let me get this straight. The only articles that arent lies are the ones you want to believe?
Seems par for the course.
Seems par for the course.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:51 pm to Madking
quote:
The fact that they didn’t have a firearm, took the time to call for one, waited for it then used it proves they’re not innocent in any way. If they were in danger like the idiot gumps keep trying to convince people of they wouldn’t have lasted long enough to get the murder weapon
Yea it’s kinda hard to argue against this point. They could have just called it a night and went home. Can’t be getting disrespected tho.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:56 pm to Legionfield
I'll trust NYT over a random blog site I have never heard of .com
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:57 pm to Madking
quote:
If they were in danger like the idiot gumps keep trying to convince people of they wouldn’t have lasted long enough to get the murder weapon.
Did you just willfully ignore the part where the Jeep passengers were the last people to show up at the scene
Posted on 3/18/23 at 12:58 pm to Glorious
They don't care. They'll never change their mind, no matter what.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:00 pm to Legionfield
quote:
new details
Did the murdered lady live?
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:00 pm to Old Money
quote:
I'll trust NYT over a random blog site I have never heard of .com
Truth is hard to come by and there is precious little of it in life. Random trust is just another way of saying I'm a sheep. Congrats!
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:02 pm to Glorious
You mean according to this guys “story”? Because he embellishes quite a bit.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:03 pm to Madking
quote:
Because he embellishes quite a bit
Rich considering the amount of absolute bullshite you people have come up with about this story.

Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:03 pm to Madking
quote:
You mean according to this guys “story”?
I can post the ESPN story that was written with the aid of video evidence on the night if you’d like

Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:15 pm to Madking
If you won't believe an Alabama grads desperate defense of Alabama on patch.com what CAN you believe??


Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:15 pm to EarlyCuyler3
Projection as usual from you troll.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:18 pm to jonnyanony
Even with all his dishonest attempts to paint one group as villains and one group as hero’s he still can’t escape the facts of what took place. All he’s done is given stupid people a couple of false talking points.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:21 pm to bamameister
quote:
Truth is hard to come by and there is precious little of it in life. Random trust is just another way of saying I'm a sheep. Congrats!
Anyone who unironically uses the word sheep is 1) a boomer 2) not as smart as they believe they are.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:24 pm to Rhino5
My goodness. What a melt. Seek help.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:33 pm to Old Money
quote:
Anyone who unironically uses the word sheep is 1) a boomer 2) not as smart as they believe they are.
Says the sheep.
Posted on 3/18/23 at 1:36 pm to Bamarap
All the haters either:
1. Didn't read it.
2. Can't understand it.
3. Don't care because a story in Alabama about an ex Alabama player is written by a Tuscaloosa reporter.
This is coverage of a court hearing, not an opinion piece.
1. Didn't read it.
2. Can't understand it.
3. Don't care because a story in Alabama about an ex Alabama player is written by a Tuscaloosa reporter.
This is coverage of a court hearing, not an opinion piece.
Popular
Back to top
