Started By
Message
re: NCAA statement on Danny Sheridan comments
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:24 pm to e2drummer
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:24 pm to e2drummer
quote:
This isn't hard...
Sheridan said his source is in the NCAA. This is what the NCAA said in their statement:
quote:
the NCAA has not provided information to Sheridan or anyone else
If you can't understand why that proves Sheridan is wrong, then you're beyond help.
So you actually think that the NCAA would come out and divulge they have someone leaking information to what most people think is a bookie. Talk about losing credibility. They even broke their own rule about not commenting on an ongoing investigation. And since they did comment on an ongoing investigation they could have just come out and said there is no investigation of AU concerning CN and that would have been the end of that. But I didn't hear that in anything they said.
0
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:24 pm to TheBigRed
quote:
TheBigRed
Yes, I am serious with that shite.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:25 pm to 2close2Gainesville
But are they still investigated, were they even investigating? If there is nothing to it, not just Cam, I figured we would have heard a full release :wank: by now.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:26 pm to Alahunter
quote:
when you actually read it without bias
:bigfrickinglol:
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:26 pm to TheBigRed
quote:
ow, two CEO's. I guess when I think of the term CEO, I think of the CEO of Goldman Sachs or Ford, not of John Deere Tractor Supplies of Lee County.
You are obviously doing "it" wrong. And by "it", I mean your life.
Why u mad bruh?
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:26 pm to TheBigRed
quote:
Lee County Tiger
quote:
That's funny
Please explain what is funny. It's ironic that I happened to be watching the replay of UA vs. UF 2010 on WUOAD right now and Gary Danielson just said,"Remember, Alabama lost the bulk of their defensive talent from last year, so there is some real inexperience in this situation right now."
Also, I am not being biased at all with the Chiizk statement. His peers selected Steve Spurrier as COY. what other possible evidence is there to dispute my claim.
Please explain.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:27 pm to TheBigRed
quote:
Yes, I am serious with that shite.
Then you obviously cannot read a depth chart.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:28 pm to e2drummer
quote:
but it shoots down Bama fans' most promising lead.
What exactly did it shut down? That they don't know who is giving him his info? I can't believe this is so hard for some of you to understand. The person who is leaking info to Sheridan (allegedly) isn't going to come out and say he's doing it. So how in the hell would the NCAA know if Sheridan actually has a source inside?
That being said, he should have never come out and said that's where he got his info. He definitely shouldn't have said,"Oh I know the bagman, but I can't tell anyone." That was just plain stupid.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:29 pm to TheBigRed
quote:
Please explain what is funny. It's ironic that I happened to be watching the replay of UA vs. UF 2010 on WUOAD right now and Gary Danielson just said,"Remember, Alabama lost the bulk of their defensive talent from last year, so there is some real inexperience in this situation right now."
And y'all lost 3 games last year. Which is how many Auburn will lose at minimum.
quote:
Also, I am not being biased at all with the Chiizk statement. His peers selected Steve Spurrier as COY. what other possible evidence is there to dispute my claim.
Spurrier also had a helluva season, and accomplished more with even less than Auburn had. You give USCe a competent QB and they woulda been undefeated. I won't argue that. Spurrier out coached a ton of people last year. So did Chizik/Gus.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:32 pm to SohCahToa
quote:
So how in the hell would the NCAA know if Sheridan actually has a source inside?
If there is no bagman that the NCAA is trying to get to step forward.
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:33 pm to Ross
Again.. where did the NCAA infer or state that there wasn't one and his information was incorrect? They didn't address that at all.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:34 pm to Alahunter
CIRCLES I TELL YOU
:gtfo:
:gtfo:
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:35 pm to Ross
quote:
If there is no bagman that the NCAA is trying to step forward.
So, are you trying to say that the NCAA is saying there is no bagman in this statement? Because that's not at all what it says. And if there is no bagman, then there would be no investigation, and they would clarify that.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:36 pm to SohCahToa
I don't know if there is a bagman or not, nor do I care. Auburn fans are making it seem like this is some kind of huge victory, and they are completely off the hook after this release. It's quite stupid.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:36 pm to SohCahToa
...
................................................................................................................................. come the frick on.
You ask how the NCAA would know if they had someone leaking information to him. They would know if there was no information to be leaked. If Sheridan's claims were completely devoid of actual NCAA knowledge. Could also explain why they asked him to come forward and share his knowledge.
I won't even address the rest of that.
................................................................................................................................. come the frick on.
You ask how the NCAA would know if they had someone leaking information to him. They would know if there was no information to be leaked. If Sheridan's claims were completely devoid of actual NCAA knowledge. Could also explain why they asked him to come forward and share his knowledge.
I won't even address the rest of that.
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:38 pm to SohCahToa
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:38 pm to SohCahToa
quote:
Auburn fans are making it seem like this is some kind of huge victory, and they are completely off the hook after this release
No we're not. We are just laughing at the latest "ban hammer" that will leave Auburn in ruins go straight down the toilet.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:39 pm to SohCahToa
This is only one brick in the ten thousand or so I'm using to build the pyramid of victory. At the end of it all our national championship season will be a whopping 15-0, with the last win being over the entire college football world.
This post was edited on 8/26/11 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:40 pm to Ross
Seriously, why is no one seeing that they broke the "no comment" policy because someone that works in the gambling industry is saying that the NCAA is giving them information and they want to put a stop to that rumor ASAP.
There are huge implications of the NCAA if they allow there to be "insider info" leaked to the gambling world. This isn't some off the cuff allegation that a sport bet man can make about the NCAA that the NCAA wouldn't investigate into and then make it known to the world that he is not getting any info at all from them.
There are huge implications of the NCAA if they allow there to be "insider info" leaked to the gambling world. This isn't some off the cuff allegation that a sport bet man can make about the NCAA that the NCAA wouldn't investigate into and then make it known to the world that he is not getting any info at all from them.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 7:40 pm to Ross
Ross. Stop. Take a breath. Read the statement from the NCAA without bias and without wanting to discredit information. Where in that statement, does is say Sheridan is not correct with any information he could have? Where does it state that he does not have an inside source? It says neither of things. As such, it was stupid of them to say anything at all. Just as it was of Sheridan to ever open his mouth about anything. It's not that difficult to understand that. Both sides are trying to read into both statements, from Sheridan and the NCAA when there hasn't really been anything said by either of them.
Page 17 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News