Started By
Message
re: Muh negotiated settlement
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:53 pm to jonnyanony
Posted on 11/9/25 at 7:53 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
So now that it's not hypothetical ...
The contract is not hypothetical. Brian Kelly doing something to violate its terms is the hypothetical.
Again, the original question was: why are people arguing that LSU should “just pay the man”? Sure, LSU agreed to pay BK a huge amount to coach football, but if he hypothetically violated terms of that contract, why shouldn’t LSU use those terms to minimize what they pay him? I think we’re all on the same page that there’s no option to just arbitrarily refuse payment.
1
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:02 pm to Free Drinks
So how would that work...he wasn't fired for cause. Can LSU now go back and try to find stuff? The Auburn shenanigans took place before they fired the guy. I'm genuinely curious how that works
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:13 pm to Free Drinks
quote:
while completely ignoring the fact that he agreed to a morality clause that gives LSU the right to avoid paying if he violates it.
Despite what tigerdroppings tells you, the morality clause in his contract was pretty standard language and allegedly boinking the realtor wouldn’t come anywhere near violating it.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:16 pm to Free Drinks
quote:
The contract is not hypothetical. Brian Kelly doing something to violate its terms is the hypothetical.
Pulling a play from the Auburn playbook I see.
Fire a coach. Then go scorched Earth on his and his family trying to invent a scandal.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:25 pm to bigDgator
quote:m
It’s awfully funny how blase people are when it’s someone else’s money
Are you being serious or just trolling?
Why should I give a shite what multi millionaires do with their money?
You sound a little upset that LSU had folks step up to cover it.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:26 pm to captdalton
quote:
….trying to event a scandal
Can you link me to a credible source that states LSU is trying to invent a scandal?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:31 pm to Murph4HOF
If he sucks at coaching, would this firing be “for cause”?
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:34 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
Despite what tigerdroppings tells you, the morality clause in his contract was pretty standard language and allegedly boinking the realtor wouldn’t come anywhere near violating it.
Moral turpitude can paint a broad brush so maybe something like fricking the realtor in a university-owned vehicle could qualify.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:36 pm to Dawgs2122
quote:
Can LSU now go back and try to find stuff?
No and no one serious is talking about doing that. The termination was not for cause.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 1:55 am to Diseasefreeforall
Mere accusations never violate any clause and even if true, in 2025 personal relationships between consenting adults, whether extramarital or not won’t reach that bar either without some other factor like happened with Petrino hiring his volleyball player side piece. Again, that’s just fan driven wishful thinking.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 12:32 pm to Free Drinks
Good luck with that...and actually getting any coach worth a darned to join this circus. This is more petty than one of those "Real Housewives" shows.
As for the rest of of the conference, we aren't laughing with you...we are laughing at you for sure.
As for the rest of of the conference, we aren't laughing with you...we are laughing at you for sure.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News