Started By
Message

re: Miami (FL) 10 @ Texas A&M 3 Final - ABC

Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:50 pm to
Posted by LCLa
Member since Apr 2017
4395 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:50 pm to
So are we chanting SEC SEC or nah
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
22850 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

No.

Concussions result from a blow to the head.

A. If he calls to the turf and hits his head that’s also a blow to the head.

B. If he hits helmet on a knee also a concussion.

C. If he hits helmet on another helmet also a concussion.

C is what happened

Go clip that play and post it. It was not targeting. Even if he hit him in the head it doesn't mean it's automatically targeting. Stop being a pansy because your team lost.

Also, congrats on getting AGGIES as a username. It's impressive that was still available when you joined.
Posted by Marktastic86
Pismo Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2020
21132 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

So are we chanting SEC SEC or nah

A&M is still a Big 12 team at heart.

Literally everyone in this thread wanted them to lose.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
9818 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

It also wasn't targeting.


Ok? Why? That’s the answer I’ve been trying to get.

Defenseless receiver because he’s in the act of catching the ball. Defender makes contact over shoulders, concussing himself in the process. Clearly helmet to helmet, though perhaps not targeting if the receiver wasn’t defenseless. But he was, so why wasn’t it targeting?
Posted by Wishbone85
Member since Nov 2024
1981 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
2160 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:01 pm to
Looked like targeting to me. That’s what the ags get for making us sit through that abomination. Thanks for the laughs at the end.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
22850 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

But he was, so why wasn’t it targeting?

Without getting into anything else the easy answer is because refs who have been conditioned to throw a flag for targeting for any hit even close to running afoul of the rule didn't throw a flag here. Refs are flag happy they will throw one for targeting then go to replay 99/100 times.

The long answer is it wasn't targeting is because, according to the SEC website, "Targeting' means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball.”" LINK

I'm not going to quote the entire website but please look at the actual rule and the replay and tell me where it was targeting based on the play.
Posted by BIG CAT
louisiana
Member since Jan 2005
3853 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:08 pm to
Hate A&M ,but that dumb arse running back that scored at the end is a fool if he slides at the end gets first down and game over. He gave the faggies a chance and it almost cost them
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89235 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

So are we chanting SEC SEC or nah


F NO

faggies and shorthorns and chokelahoma are not real SEC.

F sankey.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
2233 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
1158 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

How much did you losers pay for that WR trying to impersonate a QB?


Well aren't you a peach.
Posted by n64ra
Member since Jul 2024
2164 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:30 pm to
Texas A&M didn’t belong anywhere near the CFP.
Posted by PurpleNGold
Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2006
1492 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:32 pm to
I know I sure did.


Tickle me Elmo
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 3:34 pm
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
13355 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:33 pm to
Tuck Fexas. No football playing, bbq ruining fricks LOL. Only good thing to come out of Baja Oklahoma is I-10 and I-20 eastbound to God’s Country
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
25710 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:33 pm to
A&M had the record that they would be in the playoff. Texas did not. Shouldn’t have lost to Florida
Posted by SOBMarcus
Boerne TX
Member since Apr 2020
2641 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:38 pm to
3 fricking points. At home. Against a throw in ACC team

Aggy fails always deliver
Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
3000 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

OU and A&M lose texass fans just creamed.themselves.

Posted by FloridaFrog
Member since Nov 2022
30 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:04 pm to
So instead of having 1 smackdown in the playoffs we need 3-4 every year?
Posted by WossNess
H Town
Member since Jan 2025
237 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:05 pm to
Looks like Desmond knew ball today.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
2233 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

OU and A&M lose texass fans just creamed.themselves.

quote:

Maybe that means whorns really DIDN'T deserve to be in the CFP?

Maybe not, but Texas beat both OU and aggy.
Jump to page
Page First 90 91 92 93
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 92 of 93Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter