Started By
Message
re: LSU has its own Trent Richardson
Posted on 12/17/11 at 2:46 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
Posted on 12/17/11 at 2:46 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
Fat Fowler also has gotten 99% of his carries in garbage time. Hilliard actually plays when the game is still in doubt.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 2:47 pm to FightinTiga
quote:
Fowler > Hilliard,Anyone outside of you realizes that.
Statement looks the same and has same basis of evidence.
This is fun.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 2:48 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
No dog in the fight says the Auburn fan....haha ....... no fight in the dog would be more appropriate to your kind
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:00 pm to lijtiger48
Alabama (coaches and fans) doesn't comprehend the idea of rotating quality depth.
:referenceto4thquarter&OTof9-6:
:referenceto4thquarter&OTof9-6:
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:08 pm to dkreller
quote:
Alabama (coaches and fans) doesn't comprehend the idea of rotating quality depth.
Alabama usually always rotates 2-3 backs so what does that even mean?
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:08 pm to TotalYatMove
quote:Not even close. Ware carried the ball as much as most featured backs in the SEC (15 attempts per game) except for TR and MD. You could add Ware and Ford's numbers together and they fall short of TRs. Hell, you could add Ware, Ford and Hilliard's numbers together and you would still have fewer touchdowns, fewer ypc and only about 100 more total yards than TR.
Ware, Ford and Blue would have numbers much closer to Trent's if they were a featured back.
This post was edited on 12/17/11 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:10 pm to TotalYatMove
quote:
They are all good. Ware, Ford and Blue would have numbers much closer to Trent's if they were a featured back.
Ware was a featured back. Have through the season he had 50 more carries than EL but only 100 more yards and 1 more td. His numbers were no where near TR's.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:13 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
LSU has its own Trent Richardson
What...the...frick...ever.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:13 pm to Teague
They are all better than Lacy, so it really doesn't matter. Y'all are fuuuuuuuuu[ked next year
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:15 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Y'all are fuuuuuuuuu[ked next year
nah we good dawg
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:16 pm to JBearden
Give me Hilliard. Dude is a beast.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:17 pm to Maximus
To say Fowler is better than Hilliard or Hilliard is better than Fowler is purely speculation.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:20 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:It is at this point, but I would take Hilliard over Fowler if given the choice. Neither is a top 3 SEC type back, but both can be very productive in a rotation.
To say Fowler is better than Hilliard or Hilliard is better than Fowler is purely speculation.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:23 pm to lijtiger48
You have 5 solid backs, but you don't have a Trent Richardson.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:25 pm to WDE24
It looks like "much closer to Trent's numbers than they are now" needs to be explained.
If Ford had as many carries as TR, he would have more yards. Same for Blue. Ware would not be close, but he would be closer.
This is based on ypc, which is the only calculable way of estimating. I'm aware this will not be acceptable to some of you, but I am not sure how else to extrapolate. Even if their ypc went down, my statement is still true if you understand what it means. I did not say they would be as productive, I said they would be closer. It's really not an arguable point.
If Ford had as many carries as TR, he would have more yards. Same for Blue. Ware would not be close, but he would be closer.
This is based on ypc, which is the only calculable way of estimating. I'm aware this will not be acceptable to some of you, but I am not sure how else to extrapolate. Even if their ypc went down, my statement is still true if you understand what it means. I did not say they would be as productive, I said they would be closer. It's really not an arguable point.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:25 pm to Teague
Addai, Joseph Indianapolis Colts LSU
Faulk, Kevin New England Patriots LSU
Murphy, Richard Jacksonville Jaguars LSU
Ridley, Stevan New England Patriots LSU
Williams, Keiland Detroit Lions LSU
Hester, Jacob San Diego Chargers LSU
Ingram, Mark New Orleans Saints Alabama
McClain, Le'Ron Kansas City Chiefs Alabama
Of all LSU's backs, only Faulk was a real college RB star. The rest were part of a team of backs. Something that LSU has been doing for awhile.
Faulk, Kevin New England Patriots LSU
Murphy, Richard Jacksonville Jaguars LSU
Ridley, Stevan New England Patriots LSU
Williams, Keiland Detroit Lions LSU
Hester, Jacob San Diego Chargers LSU
Ingram, Mark New Orleans Saints Alabama
McClain, Le'Ron Kansas City Chiefs Alabama
Of all LSU's backs, only Faulk was a real college RB star. The rest were part of a team of backs. Something that LSU has been doing for awhile.
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:27 pm to chipd
quote:So who was the team with Ridley and his 250 carries?
The rest were part of a team of backs.
ETA: Or Hester and his 225?
This post was edited on 12/17/11 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:28 pm to TotalYatMove
csb
you can't compare backs soley on ypc. there's a reason trent will likely go in the top 10 of next years draft.
it's also beneficial to ford that he has like 4 backs rotating with him. he's always fresh when he gets in. We run Trent until he's completely fatigued.
you can't compare backs soley on ypc. there's a reason trent will likely go in the top 10 of next years draft.
it's also beneficial to ford that he has like 4 backs rotating with him. he's always fresh when he gets in. We run Trent until he's completely fatigued.
This post was edited on 12/17/11 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:32 pm to ACL11190
I'd also like to point out that Eddie Lacy has a 7.5 ypc. Does that mean he'd have more yards than Trent if he had the same amount of carries?
Posted on 12/17/11 at 3:32 pm to ACL11190
quit arguing with the gumps, they get pleasure out of that. Just tell them that any one of their backs is better than all of ours combined, and that they will destroy us in the Dome because they outplayed us and were the better team on 11-5 and that they will dominate us again next year en route to their 2nd NC in a row.
They are the bammers; we must bow down. Don't reply to me either figs, just go along with your business.
They are the bammers; we must bow down. Don't reply to me either figs, just go along with your business.
This post was edited on 12/17/11 at 3:33 pm
Back to top
