Started By
Message
re: Lost in all of this discussion about the Dallas Turner hit on Jayden Daniels...
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:32 pm to Crimson_Chaos
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:32 pm to Crimson_Chaos
Don’t believe it was ever targeting. Roughing…yes. Turner driving Daniels into the ground was completely unnecessary. He rode him into the ground. Just dirty football.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:52 pm to imjustafatkid
In my opinion he led with his helmet. Per the rule, if there is even a question it is a targeting foul. Possibly didn't launch although both his feet come off the ground. Also, I bolded the parts of the actual rules below that apply to this play. It won't change anyone's mind but it is what it is. We can only discuss it and lay out arguments. Just because you say with authority he didn't do any of those things does not make it so. Also, it is not just about head contact but includes the neck as well.
Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting. When in question, it is a foul. ...
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indications of targeting (emphasis NCAA's) include but are not limited to:
Launch-a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to:
A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass
A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier
A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return
A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier
A player on the ground
A player obviously out of the play
A player who receives a blind-side block
A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped
A quarterback any time after a change of possession a ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feet first"

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting. When in question, it is a foul. ...
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indications of targeting (emphasis NCAA's) include but are not limited to:
Launch-a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14). When in question, a player is defenseless. Examples of defenseless players include but are not limited to:
A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass
A receiver attempting to catch a forward pass or in position to receive a backward pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier
A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return
A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick, or one who has completed a catch or recovery and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier
A player on the ground
A player obviously out of the play
A player who receives a blind-side block
A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been stopped
A quarterback any time after a change of possession a ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feet first"
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:53 pm to RollTide1987
You always have to beat the REFs and Bama. That is why Kelly went for two last year. He had to.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:56 pm to topcat88
They threw a flag on the play. Not sure what more you people want.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 2:57 pm to AlterDWI
2 penalty flags, Bama to concede the game, and an immediate claim to the National Championship
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:02 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Let's argue for the sake of it that it was indeed targeting.
It was targeting
quote:
Even if it would have been called correctly on the field
So you agree, it should have been called targeting.
quote:
what exactly would have changed?
Correct call being made and player ejected.
Does that mean the outcome, changes? No. I’m not saying that some LSU fans claimed it changed the outcome, but I haven’t seen that argument being made.
At the end of the day, LSU fans see it as targeting…
Alabana fans don’t see it as targeting.
Why? Bc it’s their guy they are defending.
If this was reversed, both sides wld be arguing the others point.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:04 pm to AlterDWI
For the fricking play to be reviewed for targeting. Everyone has seen a play less egregious than that reviewed for targeting.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:04 pm to bstew3006
quote:
If this was reversed, both sides wld be arguing the others point.
Finally beefstew says something intelligent.
quote:
It was targeting
Didn’t last long.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:05 pm to RollTide1987
Just for arguments sake - are you asking if teams in the lead should not be penalized because it “wouldn’t make a difference”?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:06 pm to bstew3006
This guy gets it
Now let's all discuss whether or not we think a hit like that SHOULD be targeting... I vote NO

Now let's all discuss whether or not we think a hit like that SHOULD be targeting... I vote NO
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:06 pm to topcat88
quote:
For the fricking play to be reviewed for targeting. Everyone has seen a play less egregious than that reviewed for targeting
Dude for the 1000th godamn time, it WAS reviewed. Brian Kelly confirmed that.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:17 pm to AlterDWI
it was reviewed, met every condition to be called targeting but wasn't. The discretion sucks. especially when those ARE the type of hits they are trying to remove from football.
watch turner do it again this weekend too.
watch turner do it again this weekend too.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:23 pm to monsterballads
quote:
watch turner do it again this weekend too
He does it every week. He has special targeting privileges.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:26 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
What exactly are we arguing here? You can say the refs missed a call but its impact on the game would have been negligible if they had called it correctly. Daniels would have remained injured targeting or no targeting. I just don't see how it would have mattered.
It only matters that the program that wants to hoist itself on the pedestal of greatness teaches, encourages, and endorses dirty play. Alabama has a history of this in big games and honestly I cant think of another program in CFB that has that reputation. Can you?
The billionaire I used to work for said to us minions that even the appearance of impropriety is wrong.
Most importantly, failure to address the issue properly encourages others to follow that behavior.
Kiffin hit the nail on the head when he pointed out that the system is broken when players can illegally take out the QB and remain playing.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:28 pm to GetmorewithLes
it would be one thing if dallas turner didn't have a long history of this kind of dirty play, but he does. if he gets a chance to seriously hurt the QB, he's going to take it.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:28 pm to RollTide1987
It was on par with Devin White’s targeting against Bama a few years back.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:31 pm to monsterballads
I know ya'll lost & your QB got injured & that sucks, but this stuff about DT being a dirty player is just asinine. He's an edge rusher trying to get to the #1 QB in football in the biggest game this year. Ya'll act like he's some uncontrollable menace to society breaking knees & cracking jaws
I get the feeling that most people calling him dirty have never played a down of football before.

I get the feeling that most people calling him dirty have never played a down of football before.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:32 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
he did pressure Nuss almost every pass.
Did Nuss piss his pants?

Posted on 11/7/23 at 3:33 pm to MykTide
quote:
Finally beefstew says something intelligent.
I do it all the time, you should try it.
And thanks for agreeing that you would argue it was targeting.
Popular
Back to top
