Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:50 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Biggest bunch of ankle biters I've ever seen on any message board.
Go back to the Tiger Rant.
See, I can play the same card.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:50 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Biggest bunch of ankle biters I've ever seen on any message board.
There's a lot of bleeding pussies in this thread. Not sure who has got the strongest flow b/w Aub/Ala/lsu, about tied i'd say.
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:51 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Exactly.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm to attheua
quote:
Alabama, over the great majority of this conference's history, has been the best program. Picking certain arbitrary windows that UA has had bad times doesn't change the other 60-70 years of relatively great success.
Up until about the year 1980? Yes.
In the 30+ years since? No... no, you are not. I know I'm not going to convince you since Bama fans are taught from the day that they are born that they are special and the SEC just couldn't ever do without them, that ya'll are BIGGER than the SEC.
Ya'll are the Scientologists of the SEC.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Biggest bunch of ankle biters I've ever seen on any message board.
There's a lot of bleeding pussies in this thread. Not sure who is got the strongest flow b/w Aub/Ala/lsu, about tied i'd say.
I'm not shocked you misunderstood my post directed at your fellow message board friend that you somehow have to take up for.
The guy literally inserts himself in every thread talking about your team. It's so pathetic.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
There's a lot of bleeding pussies in this thread.
This shocks you?
quote:
Not sure who has got the strongest flow b/w Aub/Ala/lsu, about tied i'd say.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
I think it is as balanced as your going to get while maintaining traditional rivalries. The only one that gets screwed up is the UF/UGA rivalry. However, they maintain the rest. Something is going to have to give at some point with the rivalry games if the divisions are to be balanced.
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:53 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
Go back to the Tiger Rant.
See, I can play the same card.
Look at me, everyone. Look at me. I'm so insecure about my team that I have to inject it into every conversation, even on boards that have nothing to do with my team. You in a nutshell.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:53 pm to TheRoarRestoredInBR
quote:
Keeneland & Bourbon
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:53 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Tiger Authority
Nothing personal, you just happened to be the last post and it was aimed at a fellow hog. Everyone is just crying like a bitch in here though, pathetic
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:54 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Nothing personal, you just happened to be the last post and it was aimed at a fellow hog. Everyone is just crying like a bitch in here though, pathetic
Man I'm not crying. I'm fine with the addition of aTm but I don't like the Missouri inclusion and changing of the geographic dynamics. Would much rather add a VT or FSU and keep the divisions as is.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:54 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
The guy literally inserts himself in every thread talking about your team. It's so pathetic.
Wait!? I made a not serious post about Arkansas in a thread where every SEC team is being mentioned.
Why don't you get your panties out of a bunch.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:54 pm to beatbammer
quote:
I keep forgetting and forgetting that your just a 50,000+ post count troll. Goddammit.
He's really good at it though. Notice how he sneaked in this little nugget:
quote:
Au/Ga is a great historic series and very close in overall record, just as Bama/Tn is.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:55 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
Wait!? I made a not serious post about Arkansas in a thread where every SEC team is being mentioned.
Why don't you get your panties out of a bunch.
yeah that's how it goes
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:56 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Man I'm not crying. I'm fine with the addition of aTm but I don't like the Missouri inclusion and changing of the geographic dynamics. Would much rather add a VT or FSU and keep the divisions as is.
Nor do I. Mizzou is dumb IMO, need to add a team from east coast area for sure. I don't know why everyone is acting like Mizzou is in, is there a link?
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:57 pm to piggidyphish
No double talk. I've been succinct and straightforward. You are the one that generalized what I specifically said. I never said Bama fans would want this, or want that. I stated what I would want. Pure and simple. From there, you and beatbammer got your panties in a wad and started trying to degrade Bama's history and it's fans. Insecurity suits both of you to a tee.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:57 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Up until about the year 1980? Yes.
In the 30+ years since? No... no, you are not. I know I'm not going to convince you since Bama fans are taught from the day that they are born that they are special and the SEC just couldn't ever do without them, that ya'll are BIGGER than the SEC.
Ya'll are the Scientologists of the SEC.
If you don't think UA can swing a big dick and torpedo moves in conference....You're crazy.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:57 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Nor do I. Mizzou is dumb IMO, need to add a team from east coast area for sure. I don't know why everyone is acting like Mizzou is in, is there a link?
seems to be speculation at this point. I understand the television market dynamic but frick, Missouri still makes no sense to me at all. Include VT or FSU and be done with expansion at 14. Adding just to add to get to 16 is dumb.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:57 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Hubbhogg
Not everyone is crying like a bitch. It's the few that are crying are really fricking loud
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News