Started By
Message
re: Looking back....A&M vs Texas in the SEC.........update p 26
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:05 am to Ccslimm
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:05 am to Ccslimm
quote:
Texas was the first choice but they wouldn’t come without OU.
Provide evidence of this narrative?
quote:
Same with VA tech bring UVA...we took backup plans
This is fallacy and not sure why it persists. SEC is the firewall to the ACC to protect ESPN properties from being taken by FOX and the B1G.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:07 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
This is fallacy and not sure why it persists. SEC is the firewall to the ACC to protect ESPN properties from being taken by FOX and the B1G.
What
in
The
Hell
Is
this
bullshite?
Oh boy.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:10 am to Cheese Grits
You’ve basically drug your nuts across dstone12’s face for 2 pages, that was entertaining
Then I noticed the tide fan shook him like a rag doll for the first 2 pages
This thread needs to be stickied for everyone to laugh at dstone
Then I noticed the tide fan shook him like a rag doll for the first 2 pages
This thread needs to be stickied for everyone to laugh at dstone

Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:10 am to dstone12
Jeez. This thread started with a tired premise, then took it to slap-fighting levels rarely seen even on this board.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:11 am to Old Sarge
Stunna Tide has been even dumber ITT incredibly
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:11 am to dstone12
You may not be a full-blow sip fan, but you have some ties to them. Nobody talks that way without having some dong in their mouth.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:12 am to Old Sarge
quote:
This thread needs to be stickied for everyone to laugh at dstone
How will it be stickies when the rant’s biggest pussy is wearing her nails down hitting the RA?
You coward. Stop RAing all the time. That goes for the other 7 aggys that wrote the book on continual RA.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:14 am to Old Sarge
Oh, THIS LOSER shook someone like a rag doll? Is this ag alter the one you are hitching your wagon to?
Please sarge.....continue
Please sarge.....continue

This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 7:15 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:14 am to dstone12
go ahead and get mad and run away again
It’s your thing
And chicken has already established it as fact that LSU fans RA more than any other fans
It’s your thing
And chicken has already established it as fact that LSU fans RA more than any other fans
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:15 am to Old Sarge
quote:
And chicken has already established it as fact that LSU fans RA more than any other fans
There is one thing he cannot establish. It’s that I’ve ever RAd an aggy thread.
You’ve got him on email. Ask him.
And as you know, you’re the only one running away.
You coward.
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 7:17 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:17 am to dstone12
quote:
Ou is on a different level than both.
OU's overall sports profile fits very well with the SEC sports profile and would add to the entire years content on the SECN
2 CWS in a conference of baseball schools
7 CFB MNC's in a conference of football schools
4 M Final Fours and 2 Runner Ups would be most welcome in the SEC
2 Golf championships fit well in the SEC
3 W Final Fours and 1 Runner Up would be most welcome in the SEC
4 W gymnastics fits very well in the SEC
4 Softball WCWS fits very well in the SEC
OU has a rowing team as does Alabama and Tennessee
quote:
No need for another big dog.
So you want texas but not OU?
SEC does not fear the big dog in a conference loaded with big dogs!
Again, you out yourself by fearing OU when no self respecting SEC fan fears the Sooners.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:22 am to Cheese Grits
you Have let this fly way over your head.
This is a thread that you are keeping alive.
It’s asking the sec teams that were not emotionally/mentally affected by Texas if they would rather have the notoriety of beating a better program than aggy?
Ask anyone in the country who would they rather go 7-1 over? ATM or Texas?
The answer is overwhelmingly Texas. Nobody wants to play aggy because you’ve not yet done anything noteworthy.
This question is really not for damaged-goods-aggy or mizz.
Why can’t you understand that? What is wrong with you?
This is a thread that you are keeping alive.
It’s asking the sec teams that were not emotionally/mentally affected by Texas if they would rather have the notoriety of beating a better program than aggy?
Ask anyone in the country who would they rather go 7-1 over? ATM or Texas?
The answer is overwhelmingly Texas. Nobody wants to play aggy because you’ve not yet done anything noteworthy.
This question is really not for damaged-goods-aggy or mizz.
Why can’t you understand that? What is wrong with you?
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 7:28 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:30 am to dstone12
I’m keeping it alive so everyone can laugh at you
Everyone with the exception of a few LSU trolls said your idea was stupid
Then a Bama fan and the cheese grits made you look foolish
It’s a great thread
Everyone with the exception of a few LSU trolls said your idea was stupid
Then a Bama fan and the cheese grits made you look foolish
It’s a great thread

Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:30 am to dstone12

Skipper (ESPN) and Slive (SEC) were both Tar Heel alumni
The long roots of the ACC and SEC start with the SIAA and continued into the SoCon. They split along geographic lines based on the transportation of the era (railroads) into two conferences. One to the west of the mountains and the other to the east of said mountains. We may have swapped rail for highways and air but the multiple cross conference rivalries have continued to this day.
As a texas fan you may not be aware of this but ties between the ACC and SEC are still in place after a century of common ground. ACC and the SEC are the only conferences to maintain so many non conference rivalries. Now that Penn State has cancelled the Pittsburgh game, Iowa vs Iowa State remains the ONLY cross conference rival games in the B1G, B12, and PAC.
Some B1G fanboy site started the VT and NC State to the SEC rumor as they were predicting the B1G to cherry pick UVA and UNC in the deal. For some reason this speculation has become accepted as fact when it is farthest from the truth.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:35 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
Skipper (ESPN) and Slive (SEC) were both Tar Heel alumni The long roots of the ACC and SEC start with the SIAA and continued into the SoCon. They split along geographic lines based on the transportation of the era (railroads) into two conferences. One to the west of the mountains and the other to the east of said mountains. We may have swapped rail for highways and air but the multiple cross conference rivalries have continued to this day. As a texas fan you may not be aware of this but ties between the ACC and SEC are still in place after a century of common ground. ACC and the SEC are the only conferences to maintain so many non conference rivalries. Now that Penn State has cancelled the Pittsburgh game, Iowa vs Iowa State remains the ONLY cross conference rival games in the B1G, B12, and PAC. Some B1G fanboy site started the VT and NC State to the SEC rumor as they were predicting the B1G to cherry pick UVA and UNC in the deal. For some reason this speculation has become accepted as fact when it is farthest from the truth.
Again.
No one cares. You spend way too
Much time on TIgerdroppings and it looks like the internet in general.
Info drops aren’t the way to answer this question.
It was just a question about who you’d rather beat.
You know the answer.
You ags got all rustled that you came out of the safe space.
Triggered along with your boy “stunna”.

Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:40 am to dstone12
Neither. I would have added South Alabama instead of either of the Texas schools
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:52 am to dstone12
quote:
Why can’t you understand that?
I understand way more than you do. Born and raised in the SEC footprint and old enough to have spent time at the dinner tables of decision makers from the earliest days of the SEC in the 30's it is obvious that the SEC wants teams not individuals.
TAMU is a team player, texas is not
texas left the SIAA when they were not treated as "special" and formed a conference they could control (SWC). LSU and Ole Miss told texas to "f*ck off" then when asked to join the SWC and remained in the pre SEC.
quote:
The answer is overwhelmingly Texas.
Spoken like a texas fan as TAMU has history with Arkansas without the texas arrogance. TAMU has a history with LSU along similar lines.
texas vs LSU 18 games
TAMU vs LSU 57 games
texas vs UA 78 games
TAMU vs UA 75 games
TAMU has a shared history of SEC football coaching ties, where does texas have a similar shared history?
quote:
Texas if they would rather have the notoriety of beating a better program than aggy
Again, only a texas homer would have this view that somehow SEC fans prefer watching them when it was TAMU that got the SEC invite. SECN was a business decision based on broad sports appeal and TAMU made the cut when texas did not. Only you appear to have such denial when the down votes on your OP shows clear opposition to your point by actual SEC fans on here.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:54 am to dstone12
Should have never expanded.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:57 am to dstone12
quote:
you Have let this fly way over your head.
This is a thread that you are keeping alive.
It’s asking the sec teams that were not emotionally/mentally affected by Texas if they would rather have the notoriety of beating a better program than aggy?
Ask anyone in the country who would they rather go 7-1 over? ATM or Texas?
The answer is overwhelmingly Texas. Nobody wants to play aggy because you’ve not yet done anything noteworthy.
This question is really not for damaged-goods-aggy or mizz.
Why can’t you understand that? What is wrong with you?
Mablybe you have a point.
In the 80s - 90s. going 5-0 to LSU did cocksucking shite for us.
Beating LSU last year did not improve our bowl stock.
Alabama certainly has not benefited from beating the frick out of LSU every year.
Maybe beading Texas would be better for us than beating LSU.
.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 7:59 am to IAmNERD
quote:
Should have never expanded.
Yeah he got humiliated when he tried to explain his position

Popular
Back to top
