Started By
Message
re: Let's clear something up: LSU's 2003 Title is not a legitimate title
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:22 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:22 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:23 pm to FreddieMac
The official "COACHES" National Championship.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:24 pm to bayou85
quote:
not earning it on the field.
The BCS was supposed to be 1 (USC) vs 2 (LSU)...not 2 (LSU) vs 3 (Oklahoma).
Had Kansas State not beaten Oklahoma, they would have played USC and had a legitimate national championship.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:38 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
OP left out a lot of critical facts in his post.
Melt aggy bitch.
Melt aggy bitch.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:38 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I disagree with Chicken. Here’s your prize:
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:39 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
They were so in love with OU back then. They couldn't do any wrong. LSU should have jumped USC in the AP after shutting OU's offense down and beating them.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:40 pm to bayou85
quote:
They were so in love with OU back then. They couldn't do any wrong. LSU should have jumped USC in the AP after shutting OU's offense down and beating them.
No, they should have played USC in the Sugar Bowl and not Oklahoma.
The BCS treated a 28-point blowout the same as a triple overtime road loss (USC lost in 3OT to Cal).
Posted on 1/11/22 at 2:54 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
No, they should have played USC in the Sugar Bowl and not Oklahoma.
The BCS treated a 28-point blowout the same as a triple overtime road loss (USC lost in 3OT to Cal).
A Cal team that had Aaron Rodgers as the starter for that game (though he left the game injured, having staked Cal to a 21-7 lead.)
GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 1/11/22 at 3:05 pm to FreddieMac
Toonces was on the trophy!? GTFO with that shite.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News