Started By
Message
re: Les Miles on schedule disadvantage
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:12 pm to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:12 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I an still waiting for a rebuttal of my Big 6+1 argument for divisional alignment. Nobody wants to touch it
Because it's about the most stupid thing that's ever been posted on here.
Georgia, Florida, Bama, Auburn, SC, Tennessee, and LSU
A&M, Kentucky, Mizzou, Vandy, Ole Miss, State, and Kentucky
Yea good for A&M
1
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:12 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Its not our fault some other schools don't have the backbone to speak out against it.
Funny how yall have the "backbone" to whine about it now, but when Saban was there yall just sucked it up and played like real men.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:12 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Its not our fault some other schools don't have the backbone to speak out against it. Funny how the New guys act like they have been around forever. See we stand up for ourselves to fix our problems instead of running away from the bully
So juvenile
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:12 pm to RT1941
It don't matter what the coaches vote you idiot. The AD's and SEC office are gonna be the ones who decide and they will do what they think is best regardless of what the coaches say.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:15 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:Les & Joe have been beating their drum for a while about this issue. Let us all know when they accumulate any supporters in the conference.
It don't matter what the coaches vote you idiot. The AD's and SEC office are gonna be the ones who decide and they will do what they think is best regardless of what the coaches say.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:16 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
It don't matter what the coaches vote you idiot. The AD's and SEC office are gonna be the ones who decide and they will do what they think is best regardless of what the coaches say.
do you know how the AD's voted as well?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:16 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
The AD's and SEC office are gonna be the ones who decide and they will do what they think is best
Than clearly the majority of these AD's and the SEC think we doing a fine job with scheduling.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:16 pm to bigpapamac
You are ignorant if you think Saban wouldnt be lobbying for the same if he were here. Miles says he dont have a problem with HUNH offenses but Saban is whining about that now isn't he? Why? Because our defense has the speed to stop it and Saban dont like the fact that it puts the heavy defenses that he fields at a disadvantage. So why doesn't he just suck it up and play like a man?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:16 pm to PortCityTiger82
The vote for a 9 game schedule was 13-1 in favor of keeping it the way it is. I believe Alabama was the only vote for change.
The bridge schedule tries to follow the rotation as best it can as far as I can tell. Your opponents rotate on in the same year they were scheduled to following the old scheduling format, and rotate off the next year. Thus Kentucky was supposed to rotate on this year.
We played Missouri last year instead of UGA. This was to give each of the new teams a premier cross divisional game. Alabama as the premier team in the west (sorry but it is currently true) played Missouri and Florida as the premier team in the east played A&M.
Ignore the post if you only want to flame. The schedules are messed up now because of two new additions and a weird format. Nothing to do with Alabama.
The bridge schedule tries to follow the rotation as best it can as far as I can tell. Your opponents rotate on in the same year they were scheduled to following the old scheduling format, and rotate off the next year. Thus Kentucky was supposed to rotate on this year.
We played Missouri last year instead of UGA. This was to give each of the new teams a premier cross divisional game. Alabama as the premier team in the west (sorry but it is currently true) played Missouri and Florida as the premier team in the east played A&M.
Ignore the post if you only want to flame. The schedules are messed up now because of two new additions and a weird format. Nothing to do with Alabama.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:17 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:He hasn't a freakin clue.
do you know how the AD's voted as well?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:17 pm to RT1941
Its gonna change regardless if the others support it or not. The SEC knows the backlash will grow if it doesn't
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:18 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Miles says he dont have a problem with HUNH offenses but Saban is whining about that now isn't he
Stay on topic, this is about scheduling
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:18 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:Don't you dare bring the HUNH horseshite into a schedule thread.
You are ignorant if you think Saban wouldnt be lobbying for the same if he were here. Miles says he dont have a problem with HUNH offenses but Saban is whining about that now isn't he? Why? Because our defense has the speed to stop it and Saban dont like the fact that it puts the heavy defenses that he fields at a disadvantage. So why doesn't he just suck it up and play like a man?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:19 pm to RT1941
quote:
He hasn't a freakin clue.
Well lets go make some more shite up to support the argument
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:19 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
If you read my earlier posts I said its not Bamas fault but the SEC needs to get off their arse and get a schedule figured out. You have an office full of graduates and you can't figure out a damn schedule? Give me a break!
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:21 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
You have an office full of graduates
I would hope the people who work for the SEC have graduated
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:21 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:
Its not our fault some other schools don't have the backbone to speak out against it. Funny how the New guys act like they have been around forever. See we stand up for ourselves to fix our problems instead of running away from the bully
and in the process somebody else has to pick up the burden you shunning and y'all continue to ignore the question that makes the biggest point of all.
Why don't we schedule every team to have 2 cross-division opponents, with one opponent being a "good" team and one that is a "shitty" team.
Questions, though:
1. How do we decide who is good and who is shitty
2. Does the "good" label and "shitty" label stick forever? If not, how do we change it?
These are two very important questions that, if you seriously answer, you will see how stupid your arguments are, and you will also prove my point on a number of other threads.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:21 pm to PortCityTiger82
sorry i wasn't going to go back and read through all the flames.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:21 pm to PortCityTiger82
quote:What's gonna change? Who's gonna change it? The coaches and the AD's are the one's that vote, right?
Its gonna change regardless if the others support it or not. The SEC knows the backlash will grow if it doesn't
Posted on 7/18/13 at 2:22 pm to NYCAuburn
Y'all wanna bring up whining so there it is. You'll probably side with big brother over your own coach on that issue too
Page 24 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News