Started By
Message
re: Les Miles on schedule disadvantage
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:38 am to Monticello
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:38 am to Monticello
Florida was far from overrated. They had a very tough defense last year and played very physical. The games they won weren't just a fluke
1
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:39 am to Draconian Sanctions
It all washed out in the end because Bama beat the East champ who beat Florida, so Florida was not that good, they just beat two lesser teams in the West, right? Is that what you're saying?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:40 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Georgia? They finished behind both Florida and Tennessee. LSU and Arkie both played Tennessee, a tougher opponent than Georgia that year
but you get to take out your permanent and we don't.
quote:
Hypocritical idiots
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:40 am to KaiserSoze99
Why are people using the transient property? It is ignorant and holds no water
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 11:41 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:41 am to Monticello
quote:
Agreed. But you are saying in your schedule swap analogy that Florida would be an automatic loss for Alabama, which certainly is not true.
No one is saying that. Perhaps yall drop one to USC instead. Most likely you arent relatively fully healthy going into the LSU game and that miricle last minute never comes to fruition.
You had a season of rest prior to LSU. Couldnt get it up for back to backs. Then coast to Atlanta where you squeaked one out because of UGAs poor management.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:41 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It all washed out in the end because Bama beat the East champ who beat Florida, so Florida was not that good, they just beat two lesser teams in the West, right? Is that what you're saying?
No I'm say that LSU, A&M and Alabama were all comparable teams over the course of the regular season and the team that got the benefit of going to the SECCG did so because of their weak SEC East opponents.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:43 am to Monticello
quote:
Monticello
UF would have been the best D Bama faced all year and that is a fact.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:43 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No I'm say that LSU, A&M and Alabama were all comparable teams over the course of the regular season and the team that got the benefit of going to the SECCG did so because of their weak SEC East opponents.
So, that assumes that Florida would have also beat Alabama, and assumes that A&M and LSU would have beat Georgia in the SECCG, right?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:44 am to PortCityTiger82
Honest question because I don't know the answer, but did Saban complain and whine like Miles does about playing UF when he was at LSU?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:45 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It all washed out in the end because Bama beat the East champ who beat Florida, so Florida was not that good
Dude do you remember the UGA/UF game? Do you remember that fluke play where the UF TE was inside the 5 - going in for the tying score - then decided to leap in the air and drops the football?
UF should have won that game, frankly. Not that I am a fricking Florida fan or anything, but I just think your comment was kinda dumb considering the way in which Georgia beat them.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 11:48 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:46 am to bigpapamac
This thread is comedy GOLD! 
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:47 am to TxTiger82
Do you think Florida would have beat Alabama?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:48 am to Adam Banks
quote:
What from bamas season indicates to you that you would come out with less than 2 losses vs a stretch of UF, USC, TAMU LSU?
I can't tell you what would happen in a game that was never played. I can tell you that Alabama played #8 Michigan, #13 MSU, #5 LSU, #15 aTm, #3 UGA, and #1 ND and went 5-1 against those teams with a combined score of 198-109.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:49 am to TxTiger82
quote:
UF should have won that game
and a the shitty UT team that yall bitch about bama playing almost beat LSU and BAma because of flukes, recently, but that doesn't really matter because that wasn't the outcome.
if it wasn't for a fumble last year, you wouldn't have beat Auburn, but again that wasn't the outcome
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 11:51 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:49 am to NATidefan
quote:
This thread is comedy GOLD!
What if Alabama had been forced to play the Washington Redskins instead of Mizzou? How would things have played out then?
LSU fans have a fair point about the scheduling, but the topic always dissolves into a confusing gumbo of hypotheticals.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 11:50 am
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:50 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Do you think Florida would have beat Alabama?
Probably not. However, given that Florida had the best defense Alabama would have faced all year, and given the fact that they beat LSU and lost to Georgia on a fluke (both teams took Bama to the wire), I'm not gonna sit here and tell you there is no way they wouldn't have.
It is very possible that Florida could have beaten Alabama. Why not? They were beatable.
Hell A&M beat them and they were garbage.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:50 am to PortCityTiger82
What teams would we have to play every year to please you?
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:50 am to Monticello
quote:
#1 ND
Post facto. Invalid.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:51 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
If LSU and Bama had traded schedules last year, LSU would have won the West, period.
So it is a 100% fact that LSU beats UT and Mizzou and Alabama loses to either USCe or Florida. Hmmm ok.
Posted on 7/18/13 at 11:51 am to Monticello
The fact you are trying to use State in your argument is telling.
Regular season the end of reg season top ten SEC teams (only back to back games vs elite SEC teams)
Bama 1-1 with a -1 point differential.
quote:
5-1 against those teams with a combined score of 198-109.
Regular season the end of reg season top ten SEC teams (only back to back games vs elite SEC teams)
Bama 1-1 with a -1 point differential.
This post was edited on 7/18/13 at 11:54 am
Page 15 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News