Started By
Message
Least experienced, most experienced rosters this upcoming season ...
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:27 am
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:27 am
The one that strikes me immediately is LSU at 126.
As a Gamecock fan having Georgia, South Carolina and Clemson all three at 56 is important. SC has been way behind the past two seasons. Still not great for SC ... but better. These are the two teams favored over SC in the preseason.
Some other noteables on this list ...
I see why Miss State at 9 is receiving a lot of hype.
Bama, at 31 and with their talent, is dangerous as always.
A&M at 108 is surprising.
Auburn at 95 says, to me, that they are loaded with a lot of young talent.
From Phil Steele ...
As a Gamecock fan having Georgia, South Carolina and Clemson all three at 56 is important. SC has been way behind the past two seasons. Still not great for SC ... but better. These are the two teams favored over SC in the preseason.
Some other noteables on this list ...
I see why Miss State at 9 is receiving a lot of hype.
Bama, at 31 and with their talent, is dangerous as always.
A&M at 108 is surprising.
Auburn at 95 says, to me, that they are loaded with a lot of young talent.
From Phil Steele ...
quote:
To formulate a point system, I awarded 3 points for every senior starter (2.5 for every additional senior in the two deep) 2 points for every junior starter (1.5 for every additional junior in the two deep) 1 point for a sophomore starter (0.5 for every additional soph in the two deep) then subtracted 1 point for every frosh starter and .5 for every frosh in the two deep. The total points column uses that formula to figure out the points awarded to a team. The number before the team is where they came up in my overall ranking of all the teams in the NCAA. This list was compiled during magazine season and there have been some changes to the two deep since it went to press, which may not be accounted for. This chart will give you an idea of the most experienced and least experienced teams in the NCAA this year.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:45 am
12
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:30 am to scrooster
What was Bama last year?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:35 am to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
What was Bama last year?
In the 80s or 90s I believe.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:35 am to I Bleed Garnet
If I am not mistaken they were around 40 last year. So they are actually more experienced this year than last.
That is incorrect.
I'm looking for my copy of last year's Phil Steele magazine, but Bama was in the 40s last year.
SC was 128 last year.
Georgia was in the 40s too.
Clemson was in the 40s.
Those are the three I always make sure to note. Bama I noted because they actually were not the most experienced team in the conference last year ... Vandy was. Vandy usually is because they have little to no players who enter the draft early and they are often loaded with 40%+ JRs and SRs.
quote:
In the 80s or 90s I believe.
That is incorrect.
I'm looking for my copy of last year's Phil Steele magazine, but Bama was in the 40s last year.
SC was 128 last year.
Georgia was in the 40s too.
Clemson was in the 40s.
Those are the three I always make sure to note. Bama I noted because they actually were not the most experienced team in the conference last year ... Vandy was. Vandy usually is because they have little to no players who enter the draft early and they are often loaded with 40%+ JRs and SRs.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:43 am
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:37 am to scrooster
quote:
In the 80s or 90s I believe.
quote:
If I am not mistaken they were around 40 last year.
So what is it? where are these numbers from?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:39 am to scrooster
Can someone post the SEC teams? I'm not being lazy but im at work and would like to see the list but cant do it myself.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:41 am to kilo
9. Mississippi State
31. Alabama
44. Missouri
44. Vanderbilt
50. Florida
50. Ole Miss
56. Georgia
56. South Carolina
79. Arkansas
84. Kentucky
84. Tennessee
95. Auburn
108. Texas A&M
126. LSU
31. Alabama
44. Missouri
44. Vanderbilt
50. Florida
50. Ole Miss
56. Georgia
56. South Carolina
79. Arkansas
84. Kentucky
84. Tennessee
95. Auburn
108. Texas A&M
126. LSU
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:42 am to scrooster
LSU is going to lose a lot of game this year.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:43 am to SummerOfGeorge
Thanks George.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:43 am to Farmer1906
quote:
LSU is going to lose a lot of game this year.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:44 am to scrooster
quote:
Thanks George.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:51 am to scrooster
Is this Phil Steele?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:55 am to SummerOfGeorge
I found my 2017 magazine ...
12 Mizzou
12 Vandy
21 Georgia
22 Tennessee
49 Auburn
68 Kentucky
87 LSU
91 Ole Miss
92 Miss State
100 Bama (I was waaaaaay wrong above - must have been thinking about Auburn)
114 South Carolina
120 A&M
124 Arkansas
ETA: The conference was really very young last year.
12 Mizzou
12 Vandy
21 Georgia
22 Tennessee
49 Auburn
68 Kentucky
87 LSU
91 Ole Miss
92 Miss State
100 Bama (I was waaaaaay wrong above - must have been thinking about Auburn)
114 South Carolina
120 A&M
124 Arkansas
ETA: The conference was really very young last year.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:58 am
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:57 am to scrooster
quote:
If I am not mistaken they were around 40 last year. So they are actually more experienced this year than last.
quote:
LINK /
#67 for Alabama; which was 9th in the conference
Edit - I guess this is totally different "Experience" chart actually
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 11:59 am
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:57 am to scrooster
quote:
In the 80s or 90s I believe.
That's his answer ever year.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:58 am to thunderbird1100
So Clemson was in the 100s last year?
Posted on 7/12/18 at 11:58 am to scrooster
The link posted says 26 for us
Posted on 7/12/18 at 12:00 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Thank you. I appreciate that.
Posted on 7/12/18 at 12:03 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
LINK /
#67 for Alabama; which was 9th in the conference
You're not comparing apples to oranges.
The magazine has two different ratings.
You're looking at the overall roster.
The one I posted in the OP is strictly 2-deep.
Two different ratings.
ETA: I see you already caught that.
This post was edited on 7/12/18 at 12:10 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News