Started By
Message

re: Last time Auburn has been this irrelevant???

Posted on 3/31/09 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

(USC has just as good of a defense as Auburn and a much better offense)


Very, very debatable. We were absolutely loaded on offense that year.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:10 pm to
Auburn schedule in 2004:

9-4-04 LOUISIANA-MONROE 31-0
9-11-04 at Mississippi State 43-14
9-18-04 LOUISIANA STATE 10-9
9-25-04 THE CITADEL 33-3
10-2-04 at Tennessee 34-10
10-9-04 LOUISIANA TECH 52-7
10-16-04 ARKANSAS 38-20
10-23-04 KENTUCKY 42-10
10-30-04 at Mississippi 35-14
11-13-04 GEORGIA 24-6
11-20-04 at Alabama 21-13
12-4-04 SEC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME
vs. Tennessee @Atlanta, GA 38-28
SUGAR BOWL @New Orleans, LA
1-3-05 vs. Virginia Tech 16-13

Average winning score 32 - 11. Pretty good offense and defense, especially in the SEC.

USC 2004 schedule:

Aug. 28, 2004 Virginia Tech 24-13
Sept. 11, 2004 Colorado State 49-0
Sept. 18, 2004 at BYU 42-10
Sept. 25, 2004 at Stanford 31-28
Oct. 9, 2004 California 23-17
Oct. 16, 2004 Arizona State 45-7
Oct. 23, 2004 Washington 38-0
Oct. 30, 2004 at Wash. St. 42-12
Nov. 6, 2004 at Oregon State 28-20
Nov. 13, 2004 Arizona 49-9
Nov. 27, 2004 Notre Dame 41-10
Dec. 4, 2004 at UCLA 29-24
Jan. 4, 2005 Oklahoma 55-19

Average winning score 41 - 12. In the Pac 10 with one less game played. I think Auburn woulda put up a good showing, and possibly could have won. Usc had a couple of close ones also.

This post was edited on 3/31/09 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Why is USC revered as some invincible team in 2004? Did you not watch them play Stanford, UCLA, California, or Oregon State? Two of these teams were .500 or worse and Oregon State was merely decent and all four of those teams almost knocked USC off.


Do not forget VT who was beating USC a good part of that game and the final was deceptive due to late VT screw ups.

Meanwhile, AU pretty much waxed the entire SEC and was never challenged with the exception of LSU all year. We had double digit leads in the 4th quarter of every game and basically were in a prevent and running up the middle every game by the end of the third quarter. Also, UGA was 10-1 and a top ranked team when AU beat the hell out of them.

If I had to bet on AU-USC that year I would put the money on AU.
Posted by tuck
Member since Oct 2007
12653 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:26 pm to
Auburn would have beaten them. I've always thought you guys got screwed and all because of preseason rankings. You guys were without a doubt the best team in the country that year.
Posted by LuckyLee
inside vaginas
Member since Jul 2008
9145 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:29 pm to
AU should put the smack down on VT if they wanted respect. Instead they won rather unconvincingly. I think USC would've stomped Auburn.
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:38 pm to
After being passed up for the big game, its hard to get up for any bowl. (See Utah)
Posted by LuckyLee
inside vaginas
Member since Jul 2008
9145 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

After being passed up for the big game, its hard to get up for any bowl. (See Utah)


1) I don't buy the "Bama couldn't get up for lowly Utah" thought.

2) AU was undefeated and the year before there was a split NC between USC and a SEC team. Had AU beatdown VT like USC beatdown OU, they would've had a way better case.
This post was edited on 3/31/09 at 4:41 pm
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:41 pm to
quote:


AU should put the smack down on VT if they wanted respect. Instead they won rather unconvincingly. I think USC would've stomped Auburn.


Tuberville wasn't one to run up the score. They didn't score until the end of the fourth quarter. Score didn't show the outcome of the game correctly, IMO.

Plus, Virginia Tech's own coach after the game voiced that he thought that we were a better team than USC.
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

1) I don't buy the "Bama couldn't get up for lowly Utah" thought.


Well that and your manbeast OL wasnt playing, which was the key to your season last year.


Auburn would have gave USC all they wanted. USC still may have won but it would have been a game. I think AU & VT would have played USC better than OU thst year. They were a joke and only there because of the weak Big 12 conference that year and name.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
13924 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

2) AU was undefeated and the year before there was a split NC between USC and a SEC team. Had AU beatdown VT like USC beatdown OU, they would've had a way better case.
I don't think that is true. Auburn could have put 100 on VT and you wouldn't have gotten a split NC because the consensus #1 and #2 in both polls played in the BCS title game.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't 2003 the year that OU ended up in the title game even after they lost to K-State in the Big-12 championship? The reason that title was split was because the concensus 1 and 2 teams didn't play each other.
Posted by LSUKAT
Birmingham, AL.
Member since Dec 2007
1440 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 6:54 pm to
We also beat Miss State and Virginia Tech at the beginning of that year both 40 plus points. That was the year Sylvester got SEC coach of the year
he won some big game including Alabama 2 years i a row. For years before that we have had some tough teams a very goode Arizona State that we
barely won both times. Help me out LSU fans, we don't always have a pansy schedule like Auburn and some of the others that do it year after year.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Help me out LSU fans, we don't always have a pansy schedule like Auburn and some of the others that do it year after year.


Yeah, because LSU's schedule was just so freaking awesome this year. Plus, where do you get off insulting Auburn for our schedule in 2004? We tried to schedule Bowling Green, but they ditched us to go to Oklahoma and we got stuck with the Citadel. That was another reason we got passed over for the national championship game.
Posted by MattFlynnRox
Bouvet Island
Member since Sep 2007
3795 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

Help me out LSU fans, we don't always have a pansy schedule like Auburn and some of the others that do it year after year.


LSU OOC Schedule in the past 10 seasons
quote:

1999 -- San Jose St., North Texas, Houston
2000 -- Western Carolina, Houston, UAB
2001 -- Tulane, Utah St., Middle Tennessee State
2002 -- Citadel, Miami (OH), UL-Lafayette
2003 -- UL Monroe, Arizona, W. Illinois, La Tech
2004 -- Oregon State, Ark. State, Troy
2005 -- Arizona St., North Texas, App. State
2006 -- UL-Lafayette, Arizona, Tulane, Fresno St
2007 -- Va Tech, Mid Tennesse, Tulane, La Tech
2008 -- App State, North Texas, Tulane, Troy



I wouldn't exactly call that stellar OOC scheduling.
Posted by deaux68
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2007
5283 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 9:26 pm to
Auburn most definitely matched up with USC.

All you have to do is watch the SEC's past few appearances in the NCAA NCG to see the match up problems.

Auburn was screwed out of a chance. If the roles were reveresed USC would've gotten a split trophy.

Total BS.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 9:49 pm to
I will go out on a limb and give something else to debate...

That AU team may have been better than any of the recent SEC NC teams. I'll make a case:

1. Only undefeated SEC team. You can say the SEC was down that year and that was the only reason AU beat everyone pretty easily except LSU. But, LSU was very solid in '04 and the defending national champs. UGA was 10-1 when we beat them. You take out UT's 2 losses to us and what other SEC teams beat them? Bama won 10 games the next year. No team in recent memory has gone undefeated and steamrolled the SEC like '04 AU. You have to go back to Spurrier at UF or '92 Bama.

2. When was the last time an SEC team had 4 first roud NFL picks? Did any of the LSU or Gator recent NC teams? 3 first rounders? 2?

3. LSU lost two games in '07. To me, that team is not even in the discussion. AU beat UF's 06 NC team with a team that couldn't compare to our '04 team. Last year, UF lost to Ole Miss at home, but I think would probably match up the best. I do not think '03 LSU scores more than 10 points on our '04 team and AU wins that one.

All this is debatable, but it shows how strong that '04 team was. Personally, I think AU's '04 team beats all 4 recent SEC national champions.
This post was edited on 3/31/09 at 9:51 pm
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 9:57 pm to
At least they were talked about all the time in 98-99 with the Bowden drama.
Posted by EagleCM
Millbrook, AL
Member since Sep 2008
1108 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Auburn has always been the most dangerous when they are "quiet". They've been the biggest busts when they are hyped in the preseason.


Unfortunately, I agree
Posted by Tiger Roux
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
5018 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 10:18 pm to
Lets just say ya'll were robbed, but no lock on any of those teams beating the other..
No way an undefeated SEC does not make the NC game again...
Posted by EagleCM
Millbrook, AL
Member since Sep 2008
1108 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

No way an undefeated SEC does not make the NC game again...




I am glad we could pave the way for other SEC teams
Posted by woopiginaustin
Moderator
Member since Jun 2008
8590 posts
Posted on 3/31/09 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

2. When was the last time an SEC team had 4 first roud NFL picks?


I know this discussion isn't about my team and various SEC teams have had multiple first rounders in the same class but
Arkansas had two first rounders last year in McFadden/Jones and two 1st rounders in '04 in Shawn Andrews/Ahmad Carroll.

To go a step further, and I doubt most care, Arkansas has had:

6 first round picks in the last 5 drafts and 4 in the 2nd.

Considering of the 6 first rounders in the last five classes, one was the SEC's all-time rushing QB (Matt Jones), and two of them combined for more all-purpose yards than any tandem in the history of the game (DMAC/Felix Jones), and it only took them 3 years to do it, I have to ask......when was the last time Arkansas actually accomplished something?

Seems as though "more with less-Nutt" had plenty but failed to produce!
This post was edited on 3/31/09 at 10:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter