Started By
Message
re: Judge denies Joey Aguilar preliminary injunction against NCAA
Posted on 2/21/26 at 7:49 am to The Pirate King
Posted on 2/21/26 at 7:49 am to The Pirate King
quote:
id love to hear how this is different than Pavia's situation.
It is different that in this case we have a judge willing to call a spade a spade. Pavia should have never played last yr.
These guys are not winning their cases. They are only getting injunctive relief that makes the case moot.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 8:53 am to TideSaint
Higher floor with Macintyre, but also a lower floor.
I think the defense will dictate next year more so than who the QB is. Play like last year, and we are 6-7 win team with Aquilar or Macintyre.
I think the defense will dictate next year more so than who the QB is. Play like last year, and we are 6-7 win team with Aquilar or Macintyre.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:08 am to qman91
quote:
Is this just a state thing because I don't understand how some guys can be allowed to get another year but other guys don't when their situations are almost the same.
It is a state thing and the results are going to vary state by state. If a biased judge in MS rules a guy like Chambliss eligible it has no effect on what a judge in TN or any other state can or will do.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:46 pm to TideSaint
Maybe if Aguilar had a sore throat.
It worked for Chambliss
It worked for Chambliss
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:06 pm to qman91
quote:
I don't understand how some guys can be allowed to get another year but other guys don't when their situations are almost the same.
The only difference is whether the judge is impartial or not.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:41 pm to swampvol1
How do you have two floors and no ceiling? You are bad at sayings lol
Popular
Back to top

0





