Started By
Message

re: John Chavis will never be successful at A&M

Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:32 pm to
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38231 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

I'll ask again, is your defense good or is it bad? Who do you put the blame on?


It's good enough to win games. Should be very good once everything falls in place. I place the blame on the players having communication and assignment errors.
Posted by SoberAg
College Station
Member since Oct 2014
1310 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Chavis and recruiting?



If you are implying the position coaches recruited the good players on your team, then I feel fine with the ones on ours who landed Myles, Daeshon Hall, Justin Evans, Daylon Mack, etc.

Do you think your defense is good this year?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Every upvote helps


Posted by SoberAg
College Station
Member since Oct 2014
1310 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

I place the blame on the players having communication and assignment errors.


I agree with this, and by your very own logic Chavis is not to blame for our defensive struggles this season.


Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38231 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:43 pm to
I never said the defense was bad at A&M I just said John Chavis won't be successful and win championships
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:49 pm to
All A&M.

All.

The.

Time.
Posted by SoberAg
College Station
Member since Oct 2014
1310 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

I never said the defense was bad at A&M I just said John Chavis won't be successful and win championships



But he isn't responsible for your good recruits, because he doesn't recruit, yet somehow IS responsible for your terrible recruiting? (that wasn't terrible at all)

He isn't responsible for your great season in 2011, because it wasn't his recruits, but somehow doesn't get credit for developing the players on that team, or the one that is currently undefeated?

He IS third and chavis, but only after a couple years, and in the 4th quarter, when winning by a td or less, and A&M's 4th quarter defense with leads and in close games this season has no weight in disproving that?

He IS responsible for LSU's offensive woes, even though 2013 was the best statistical year in the program's history while John Chavis was DC, but A&M can't expect the same success because of a hurt QB in year one of his time here?

You are the champion of mental gymnastics my friend.
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 10:51 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38231 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:57 pm to
Chavis didn't organize the board or help in recruiting. It's why we have no depth right now except in the secondary.

He isn't responsible for 2011. LSU had a great offense that season against everyone but Alabama and Mathieu was a wrecking machine.

3rd and Chavis will rear its ugly head eventually

It's been stated tons that chavis wants a ball-control offense that doesn't turn the ball over. 2013's defense was so bad that they had to sling it around all game to be successful

Thanks
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 11:02 pm to
If 3rd and Chavis eventually happens, it will be the first 4th quarter TD we've allowed in sec play.
Posted by SoberAg
College Station
Member since Oct 2014
1310 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

He isn't responsible for 2011. LSU had a great offense that season against everyone but Alabama and Mathieu was a wrecking machine.

Chavis kills offenses though.
Crazy to me that Chavis gets no credit for how Mathieu played when it was a lot about scheme and where Chavis had him on the field.

quote:

3rd and Chavis will rear its ugly head eventually

The sun will burn itself out eventually, and isn't an incorrect statement either. But talking about it before it happens is pretty pointless, and doesn't have any bearing on what is CURRENTLY happening.

quote:

It's been stated tons that chavis wants a ball-control offense that doesn't turn the ball over.

Thank goodness we have moved to a read-option offense and have a QB that doesn't turn the ball over.

Thanks.

This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 11:06 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter