Started By
Message
re: Joey Aguilar Preliminary Injunction Hearing Just Started
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:10 pm to RB10
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:10 pm to RB10
quote:
Let’s not pretend like that should make it the norm going forward.
We've had 6+ year players going on 5+ years now. It's already the norm, whether anyone likes it or not.
1
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:11 pm to SCLibertarian
Not to that level
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:13 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
We've had 6+ year players going on 5+ years now. It's already the norm, whether anyone likes it or not.
Yeah but the only ones who’ve gotten that year because of the sniffles are hr Covid seniors and now Chambliss.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:15 pm to OleVaught14
quote:I guess State needs a law school.
No, a UT judge
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:17 pm to RB10
People have gotten a 6th year for anxiety, a sore knee, a sprained ankle, etc... let's not pretend like everyone who gets a 6th year suffered some truly devastating injury.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:22 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
People have gotten a 6th year for anxiety, a sore knee, a sprained ankle, etc... let's not pretend like everyone who gets a 6th year suffered some truly devastating injury.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:23 pm to RB10
You don't have to just blindly believe me. You can easily Google it all yourself.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:24 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
You don't have to just blindly believe me. You can easily Google it all yourself.
Don’t worry, I don’t believe you at all.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:27 pm to RB10
And too lazy to Google. So just continue your melt because your too lazy to look anything up.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:27 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Aguilar's argument is even dumber than Chambliss'
1 year of football at JUCO in 2019 (yes 2019), he redshirted
2020 his JUCO didn't have a season
2021 Diablo Valley JUCO
2022 Diablo Valley JUCo
2023 App ST
2024 App St
2025 Tennessee
So he's asking to be an 8th year senior with no medical issues being the reason. He's actually been a starter on a football team 5 seasons already
I haven't been following. What's his actual argument? That the JUCO years shouldn't count towards his eligibility?
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:27 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
You don't have to just blindly believe me. You can easily Google it all yourself.
here is what Chat GPT says
quote:
Has the NCAA actually granted one for anxiety or similar mental health reasons?
There’s no widely publicized list of specific cases, and most NCAA decisions aren’t public, but two things indicate it can happen:
Division III has explicitly supported mental health hardship waivers, allowing schools to document conditions like anxiety or depression to seek a waiver under the same rules as a physical medical hardship.
Cases do become public where mental health was part of eligibility decisions: for example, college athletes have received hardship waivers for serious non-physical health issues and NCAA rules on other waivers recognize mental health documentation as legitimate when properly supported by licensed professionals.
Real-world examples
There isn’t a well-documented high-profile case explicitly showing the NCAA granting a medical redshirt solely for anxiety that is in major media. However, the rules explicitly allow mental illness to be documented in waiver requests if the athlete was prevented from competing and the documentation meets NCAA criteria (e.g., licensed mental health professional documentation).
Also, NCAA hardship waivers have been granted for serious illnesses (like cancer treatment) and for mental health in Division III contexts under expanded criteria.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:28 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
What's his actual argument? That the JUCO years shouldn't count towards his eligibility?
Basically - same argument as the Pavia lawsuit last year which got him (and like 20-30 other football players) eligible for a 6th year last season.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:29 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
quote:
What's his actual argument? That the JUCO years shouldn't count towards his eligibility?
He's relying on the Pavia JUCO argument, yes. Was hoping the Pavia case heard on Tuesday in federal court would have a ruling before today's hearing. Aguilar was originally a co-petitioner in that lawsuit but non-suited out of it before it was heard so he could re-file in Knox County.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:29 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
And too lazy to Google. So just continue your melt because your too lazy to look anything up.
You’re the one claiming it’s happened scooter. Show your work.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:32 pm to RB10
Best of luck keeping your head in the sand. Hope that works out for you
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:33 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
Best of luck keeping your head in the sand. Hope that works out for you
So you’re making it up?
Got it.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:33 pm to lsufball19
Ah, got it, thank you (and OleVaught14)!
Posted on 2/13/26 at 2:36 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News