Started By
Message
re: It's after Tuesday. Has Will Wade been reinstated?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:20 am to StopRobot
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:20 am to StopRobot
quote:
He literally said on tape he made a "strong arse offer" and should have included the runner instead of the family. I mean
Again, he's saying that he discussed the offer with the runner and not with the player. If he is asked if he paid a player or made a player an offer, he can say no because he isn't the one dealing with the player. If the question is phrase if he arranged a player to get paid, then he would have to answer yes to that. That's all I said.
1
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:25 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
Again, he's saying that he discussed the offer with the runner and not with the player. If he is asked if he paid a player or made a player an offer, he can say no because he isn't the one dealing with the player. If the question is phrase if he arranged a player to get paid, then he would have to answer yes to that. That's all I said.
Oh OK then he is fine. Should be reinstated before COB today
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:26 am to StopRobot
quote:
Oh OK then he is fine. Should be reinstated before COB today
That's not what he's saying.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:28 am to StopRobot
quote:
Oh OK then he is fine. Should be reinstated before COB today
If you're not going to follow the thread and read what people are actually talking about, you're gonna come out looking silly. I didn't even remotely hint at what you're saying here. A couple people posed hypothetical questions to Will Wade that I said he could say no to. That's it.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:46 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
A couple people posed hypothetical questions to Will Wade that I said he could say no to.
Dude. They've got him on super secret video recordings.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:53 am to TigerLunatik
Mr. Wade, did you at any time acting in the capacity of a representative of LSU, facilitate through an intermediary to arrange inducements of any kind that would fall outside the established rules and regulations of LSU/SEC/NCAA to provide impermissible benefits to a prospective student-athlete, their parent, legal guardian, or the intermediary in exchange for the prospective student-athlete's acceptance of an athletic scholarship to LSU?
Mr. Wade, did you at any time act as a representative of LSU and while doing so did you enter into a negotiation with the assistance of an intermediary, arrange inducements of any kind with a prospective student-athlete, their parent or legal guardian in exchange for a prospective student- athletes acceptance of an athletic scholarship to LSU?
Mr. Wade, did you at any time act as a representative of LSU and while doing so did you enter into a negotiation with the assistance of an intermediary, arrange inducements of any kind with a prospective student-athlete, their parent or legal guardian in exchange for a prospective student- athletes acceptance of an athletic scholarship to LSU?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:39 am to SSpaniel
quote:
Dude. They've got him on super secret video recordings.
I swear the level of trolling and shite talk on this board reminds me of middle school. At least get your facts halfway straight.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:40 am to RT1941
quote:
RT1941
Exactly. If they ask him like that, he will have to say yes. For the record I never expected a lawyer to ask Wade directly on the stand if he personally made an offer to a player.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:50 am to RT1941
both of those questions would likely elicit objections from his attorney lol
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:02 am to dagrippa
Self incrimination?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:13 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
I swear the level of trolling and shite talk on this board reminds me of middle school. At least get your facts halfway straight.
Who's trolling? It's all on Super-8 film. Here's another view of him counting the money out.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:14 am to Ted2010
If so you wouldn't have to ask
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:23 am to SSpaniel
quote:
Who's trolling?
Well I would hope you are otherwise that means you think Wade is on video paying a player.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:27 am to TigerLunatik
Will Wade will, most likely, be reinstated after his April testimony although I think that trial is not going to happen. (Plea bargain)
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:28 am to SSpaniel
What are they waiting for to fire him? They might miss out on scooping up Johnny Jones for a 2nd run.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:40 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
Will Wade will, most likely, be reinstated after his April testimony although I think that trial is not going to happen. (Plea bargain)
I would love for that to happen, but I'm not expecting him to be back. If that happens, great. But, I'm just not gonna set myself up for disappointment with this. I think there's a low percent chance that he could be back, just not expecting it to happen.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:06 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:I don't think Wade will ever have to get on the stand and answer anything. Has he even been subpoenaed yet? And even "if" is subpoenaed, the defense would be foolish to bring him in for testimony (IMO.)
Exactly. If they ask him like that, he will have to say yes. For the record I never expected a lawyer to ask Wade directly on the stand if he personally made an offer to a player.
Wade used poor judgement in venting his frustrations to Dawkins over the phone. But I don't think he made a direct offer to a recruit, he didn't have to do that when a middleman was there to provide insulation for him.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:11 pm to RT1941
But was it damn strong insulation?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:14 pm to Ted2010
quote:Yet to be determined.
But was it damn strong insulation?
Can any coach truly trust what are basically street agents pimping kids to the highest bidder? The 100% knowledge and full participation of the kids parents?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 12:20 pm to RT1941
quote:
Has he even been subpoenaed yet?
I don't believe so.
quote:
And even "if" is subpoenaed, the defense would be foolish to bring him in for testimony (IMO.)
Several LSU fans have had the same opinion because they're saying that a pissed off Wade makes a bad witness for the defense. The wire tap conversations weren't allowed by the judge in the first trial. I'm not educated enough in how all of that works to speak on why it would be admissible evidence in this case or not with this judge.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News