Started By
Message
re: It is funny how the fans of SEC teams that do nothing but ride the coatails of two teams
Posted on 6/22/23 at 2:16 am to djsdawg
Posted on 6/22/23 at 2:16 am to djsdawg
quote:
You know your argument for 2021 sucks arse when you have to try to include 2020 players in it.
Not as much as trying to use a player who isn't a part of the team and isn't even allowed on campus. The players on both sides could have been on the team but weren't due to decisions.
1
Posted on 6/22/23 at 4:08 am to mbogo
quote:
Not as much as trying to use a player who isn't a part of the team and isn't even allowed on campus.
You love to say he was kicked off the 2021 team, which cant happen unless he was on the 2021 team to begin with.
Turns out he played in 8 games in 2021.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 5:11 am to djsdawg
quote:
You love to say he was kicked off the 2021 team, which cant happen unless he was on the 2021 team to begin with.
Which means they are not a Georgia player. I've never, nor will ever, use a player that isn't on the Bama team. If a player quit, transferred, was dismissed at any time they are not a part of the team and wouldn't be counted like a member of the team. It would reek of desperation.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 6:55 am to mbogo
quote:
Which means they are not a Georgia player.
But what matters is that he was on the 2021 team to begin with, unlike nfl players from the 2020 team, and uga felt his sudden absence, which greatly benefited Alabama.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 8:40 am to mbogo
The great misfortune for you in your entire line of reasoning which is predestined to doom is its built entirely on speculation and conjecture.
You want to travel to hypothetical land, grab a shred of data, ignore the mountain of contrary data, pretend the shred is somehow more relevant than the mountain, and then use your hypothetical subjective shred of data to make an objective statement to refute an actual objective result. Bravo! I do admire your commitment.
You want to travel to hypothetical land, grab a shred of data, ignore the mountain of contrary data, pretend the shred is somehow more relevant than the mountain, and then use your hypothetical subjective shred of data to make an objective statement to refute an actual objective result. Bravo! I do admire your commitment.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 11:33 am to roadGator
quote:
You edited a post to lie intentionally?
Provide proof.
quote:That has nothing to do with any of this.
Biden voter too?
Posted on 6/22/23 at 11:35 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:That made no sense. He has backed everything he has said with facts while you guys make shite up to fit your narrative.
The great misfortune for you in your entire line of reasoning which is predestined to doom is its built entirely on speculation and conjecture.
You want to travel to hypothetical land, grab a shred of data, ignore the mountain of contrary data, pretend the shred is somehow more relevant than the mountain, and then use your hypothetical subjective shred of data to make an objective statement to refute an actual objective result. Bravo! I do admire your commitment.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 12:20 pm to BuckI
Here's reality.
1 - UGA won the last two national championships on the field. There's no hypothetical involved with that. It's what happened.
2 - UGA had injuries and suspensions that happened while winning those titles. Some of the injuries were season ending. Some caused missed games. Some caused players to not be able to play a full number of snaps.
3 - UGA had the depth to suffer those injuries/suspensions and still win those titles.
4 - Other teams didn't. So instead they use their injuries as excuses, saying they "would have" or "could have" won without their injuries.
UGA isn't making an excuse when we say we won DESPITE injuries... because we won. It's simply noting what happened on our way to victory.
The fact that backs this is very obvious. UGA won the titles. That key fact takes all supposition out of it. There's no speculation. UGA won.
1 - UGA won the last two national championships on the field. There's no hypothetical involved with that. It's what happened.
2 - UGA had injuries and suspensions that happened while winning those titles. Some of the injuries were season ending. Some caused missed games. Some caused players to not be able to play a full number of snaps.
3 - UGA had the depth to suffer those injuries/suspensions and still win those titles.
4 - Other teams didn't. So instead they use their injuries as excuses, saying they "would have" or "could have" won without their injuries.
UGA isn't making an excuse when we say we won DESPITE injuries... because we won. It's simply noting what happened on our way to victory.
The fact that backs this is very obvious. UGA won the titles. That key fact takes all supposition out of it. There's no speculation. UGA won.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 12:57 pm to DawginSC
quote:That's correct captain obvious.
1 - UGA won the last two national championships on the field. There's no hypothetical involved with that. It's what happened.
quote:Everyone has injuries.
2 - UGA had injuries and suspensions that happened while winning those titles. Some of the injuries were season ending. Some caused missed games. Some caused players to not be able to play a full number of snaps.
quote:Then why are you still whining about injuries?
3 - UGA had the depth to suffer those injuries/suspensions and still win those titles.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 12:58 pm to BuckI
Y'all choked in the Peach Bowl. Stop your whining. 
Posted on 6/22/23 at 1:26 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
I’ve got an idea. Since the Bama and LSU crowd - and this moron from Ohio State love nothing more than whining and bitching about games they lost long ago, maybe they need their own separate site on this board. Give it a name like “Bitchers are Us”, “But we wuz hurt” or “WhineGate” and let these pathetic losers go at it. GrandPaw Saban’s gripe videos could play non stop. I’m sure they would love it and us winners would really appreciate not having to hear the same old lame excuses again and again.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 1:34 pm to djsdawg
quote:
But what matters is that he was on the 2021 team to begin with, unlike nfl players from the 2020 team, and uga felt his sudden absence, which greatly benefited Alabama.
What matters is he wasn't on the team like all former players.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 1:43 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
The great misfortune for you in your entire line of reasoning which is predestined to doom is its built entirely on speculation and conjecture.
You want to travel to hypothetical land, grab a shred of data, ignore the mountain of contrary data, pretend the shred is somehow more relevant than the mountain, and then use your hypothetical subjective shred of data to make an objective statement to refute an actual objective result. Bravo! I do admire your commitment.
Sounds like speculation. If you'd like to provide something substantive to which I can respond I will gladly do so.
This post was edited on 6/22/23 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 6/22/23 at 1:45 pm to BuckI
quote:
Then why are you still whining about injuries?
We're not.
We simply point out the players UGA was missing when others make excuses about THEIR injuries. We're pointing out that we had the depth to deal with the injuries we suffered while your teams did not.
And that's why we have back to back titles and you don't.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 1:54 pm to DawginSC
quote:
1 - UGA won the last two national championships on the field. There's no hypothetical involved with that. It's what happened.
Agreed.
quote:
2 - UGA had injuries and suspensions that happened while winning those titles. Some of the injuries were season ending. Some caused missed games. Some caused players to not be able to play a full number of snaps.
quote:
3 - UGA had the depth to suffer those injuries/suspensions and still win those titles.
See above.
quote:
4 - Other teams didn't. So instead they use their injuries as excuses, saying they "would have" or "could have" won without their injuries.
It isn't just us saying it. It was the main topic the next day.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 2:14 pm to mbogo
Once again you backed up your claims with the facts. It seems they never learn no matter how many times you school them. They just ignore the facts and continue name-calling and deflecting.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 2:22 pm to SaturdayNAthens
quote:Your own conference mates who are unbiased know you're wrong.
I’ve got an idea. Since the Bama and LSU crowd
quote:You know you lost a debate when you resort to name calling.
- and this moron from Ohio State love nothing more than whining and bitching about games they lost long ago,
Posted on 6/22/23 at 2:30 pm to BuckI
quote:
Once again you backed up your claims with the facts.
For whatever reason some Georgia fans have issues with winning due to Bama losing so many starters vs just being happy they won regardless of how it happened.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 3:35 pm to mbogo
quote:They have penis envy. It is the only thing I can think of.
For whatever reason some Georgia fans have issues with winning due to Bama losing so many starters vs just being happy they won regardless of how it happened.
Posted on 6/22/23 at 3:59 pm to mbogo
quote:
What matters is he wasn't on the team like all former players.
How did he play in 8 games and lead the team in sacks if he wasn’t on the 2021 team?
Page 32 of 41
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News