Started By
Message
re: Is Texas A&M that good?
Posted on 10/17/12 at 8:21 pm to townestoldme2
Posted on 10/17/12 at 8:21 pm to townestoldme2
quote:
You lost to Vanderbilt at home
fin.
0
Posted on 10/17/12 at 8:41 pm to VC
Kinda weird responding to a person who is now banned. What did he or she do to get banned? anybody know? If not, make up something good, real good.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 8:53 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
You lost to Vanderbilt at home 19-15. Let that sit for a second. You lost to VANDERBILT...AT HOME.
If Missouri had played our schedule:
Florida - LOSS
SMU - WIN
SCSU - WIN
Arkansas - LOSS
Ole Miss - LOSS
Louisiana Tech - LOSS
You'd be 2-4.
Vandy isn't as bad as you think. We also out-gained Vandy. We had a lot go wrong in that game, including losing our QB early.
You gave up almost 60 points to Louisiana Tech, and our defense is better than yours. We also would beat Louisiana Tech. The fact that we beat a top 25 ASU with our backup should mean we get a win over LTech hypothetically.
At worst we are 4-2, but probably have the same record as you, especially with continuity at QB, which we haven't had.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 8:56 pm to mograyback
quote:
We had a lot go wrong in that game
quote:
should mean we get a win over LTech hypothetically
quote:
especially with continuity at QB, which we haven't had.
So basically in the land of if things hypothetically went better for you, you'd be 5-1.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:01 pm to Projectpat
Yes we are but we will lose to Alabama.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:04 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Projectpat
Dude you're trash.. seriously.
If you can't understand that, sorry. Nice sloppy mess 3rd grade response.
Mizzou beat ASU with their backup, its safe to assume they would have beaten Lousiana Tech.
At the time you played Arkansas, Mizzou would have beat them too.
At worst Mizzou would be 4-2 if they played tamus schedule.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:10 pm to mograyback
La Tech would kick the shite out of mizzou.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:10 pm to mograyback
You're trying to give yourself hypothetical wins based on "if things had gone better" in the games you actually lost. If we're playing that game, every single D1 team is winning the NC this year.
You're 3-4 going on 4-8. Deal with it.
You're 3-4 going on 4-8. Deal with it.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:12 pm to mograyback
Mograyback....you keep proving you are more of an idiot every time you open your mouth on here. It's really pathetic...I'm just surprised you haven't brought up t.u. yet.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:13 pm to mograyback
quote:
At worst Mizzou would be 4-2 if they played tamus schedule.
That's nice. Here's a cookie for road food when you travel back from fantasyland.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:19 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
La Tech would kick the shite out of mizzou.
This.
See ya soon
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:19 pm to Projectpat
quote:
You're trying to give yourself hypothetical wins based on "if things had gone better" in the games you actually lost. If we're playing that game, every single D1 team is winning the NC this year.
Nope. The one thing I said about things going better was vs Vandy. A team we out-gained but lost. Game going screwy had a lot to do with losing our QB early. That difficult to understand?
Things as they are, Mizzou would at worst be 4-2 with your schedule. "If things had gone better" with injuries, then we're likely 5-1 with your schedule.
This post was edited on 10/17/12 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:21 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
La Tech would kick the shite out of mizzou.
Really, because Mizzou beat ASU.
If you're playing the comparison game fairly, you have to give Mizzou a win over La Tech.
I get dumber and dumber with what comes out of my mouth? Seems that Beer Bryant has helped some with this argument... but yeah I'm just spewing garbage.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:24 pm to mograyback
quote:
Game going screwy had a lot to do with losing our QB early. That difficult to understand?
No, no, I got you. We beat La Tech with starters suspended on the road on what should have been a bye week. So hypothetically with your schedule we beat Alabama 85-9 and are 8-0 right now.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:26 pm to Projectpat
quote:
No, no, I got you. We beat La Tech with starters suspended on the road on what should have been a bye week. So hypothetically with your schedule we beat Alabama 85-9 and are 8-0 right now.
Congratulations for making no sense.
Its basically impossible to dispute Mizzou would at least be 4-2 with Tamus schedule if you're being a fair fan, not a troll douche. You're a waste of time, I'll take the fact that a solid poster like Beer Bryant agrees on this that I'm right.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:27 pm to mograyback
Shouldn't Mizzou win a conference game before they start the "We would be X and Y with your schedule" where X is anything = or > Y?
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:27 pm to mograyback
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:27 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Really, because Mizzou beat ASU.
Just stop dude. You lost to Vandy. Come back when you have something to peacock about.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:28 pm to mograyback
quote:
Really, because Mizzou beat ASU.
If you're playing the comparison game fairly, you have to give Mizzou a win over La Tech.
I get dumber and dumber with what comes out of my mouth? Seems that Beer Bryant has helped some with this argument... but yeah I'm just spewing garbage.
As a guy who's not a fan of either team, Mizzou would be lucky to beat La Tech at home. They're certainly not Bama, South Carolina or Georgia, but I'd take them over Vandy any day. You can talk about "we outgained them" and "our QB got hurt" but at the end of the day, the scoreboard is all that matters. Be thankful you never had to play Nick Fairley.
Posted on 10/17/12 at 9:30 pm to mograyback
quote:
Congratulations for making no sense.
You're either an awesome troll or a functioning retard. No wonder B1G didn't let you in. I'm mocking you. There. Spelled it right out for you little buddy.
Are you going to explain how a 4 point home win against Arizona State relates to our schedule at all or are you just going to keep spitting out homerisms?
Page 22 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News